Tuscan Vs Tuscan S Mk 1

Tuscan Vs Tuscan S Mk 1

Author
Discussion

rotor-g

Original Poster:

18 posts

99 months

Saturday 9th January 2016
quotequote all
I have seen that there were areo changes front and back between the standard and the S. Were there any other changes?

m4tti

5,427 posts

155 months

Saturday 9th January 2016
quotequote all

ripskin

66 posts

109 months

Saturday 9th January 2016
quotequote all
rotor-g said:
I have seen that there were areo changes front and back between the standard and the S. Were there any other changes?
Quite a few changes some are;

Indicator sense colour, orange to clear,
Air conditioning on the S,
S has bigger brakes on front 330 tuscan had 297 or there abouts,
S has a bigger exhaust bore as does the Red Rose edition,
Different fueling chip and other small engine upgrades to produce 370-400bhp standard tuscan 350-360 bhp.
Rear spoiler added and indicators moved to rear body from rear screen mount,
Apparently better suspension but not sure of the details,
S models came with gas discharge headlamps,
S model came with a close ratio gearbox but not sure if this was standard on all S's,
S had digital radio and 18 inch alloys as standard.

There is more but I think thats covered most of it.

swisstoni

16,957 posts

279 months

Saturday 9th January 2016
quotequote all
Added £10k to price when new.

lerd

227 posts

196 months

Sunday 10th January 2016
quotequote all
Didn't the s Come with a hydratrack diff (prob spelt it wrong)?

TOV!E

2,016 posts

234 months

Sunday 10th January 2016
quotequote all
lerd said:
Didn't the s Come with a hydratrack diff (prob spelt it wrong)?
Yes

Basil Brush

5,080 posts

263 months

Sunday 10th January 2016
quotequote all
ripskin said:
Quite a few changes some are;

Indicator sense colour, orange to clear,
Air conditioning on the S,
S has bigger brakes on front 330 tuscan had 297 or there abouts,
S has a bigger exhaust bore as does the Red Rose edition,
Different fueling chip and other small engine upgrades to produce 370-400bhp standard tuscan 350-360 bhp.
Rear spoiler added and indicators moved to rear body from rear screen mount,
Apparently better suspension but not sure of the details,
S models came with gas discharge headlamps,
S model came with a close ratio gearbox but not sure if this was standard on all S's,
S had digital radio and 18 inch alloys as standard.

There is more but I think thats covered most of it.
The S was basically a fully optioned Red Rose with added front and rear spoilers, along with 255 front tyres instead of the (at the time) 225 standards. Front discs (322 vs standard 304) were one piece on S instead of separate disc and bell set up on RR.

ripskin

66 posts

109 months

Sunday 10th January 2016
quotequote all
Indeed, Also Tuscan tyres were 235 front 245 rear, S sizes were 235 front 255 rear and limited slip diff was standard on S was it ever on MK1??

Milky400

1,960 posts

178 months

Tuesday 12th January 2016
quotequote all
I maybe wrong, but as far as i was aware all have LSD, the S has the optional extra Hydrathingy

mab1

390 posts

227 months

Tuesday 12th January 2016
quotequote all
Milky400 said:
I maybe wrong, but as far as i was aware all have LSD, the S has the optional extra Hydrathingy
Correct. BTR diff is standard, Hydratrak optional or standard on the S. My Red Rose has a Hydratrak fitted - I only realised recently when I was going through some of the original documentation for the car.

ripskin

66 posts

109 months

Wednesday 13th January 2016
quotequote all
Good to know, does the Hydratrak thing make a noticeable difference?? Be good to see some Rolling road figures of normal and S cars now to see how they are holding up power wise pre and post rebuilds.

Tuscanuwe

323 posts

195 months

Thursday 14th January 2016
quotequote all

does the Hydratrak thing make a noticeable difference?---------

Much safer to drive, not so much spinning wheels.

Kind regards
uwe