RE: Breaking News: Tesla in Financial Difficulties?

RE: Breaking News: Tesla in Financial Difficulties?

Author
Discussion

shoestring7

6,138 posts

247 months

Thursday 16th October 2008
quotequote all
den said:
From my limited point of view, I think their eco credentials, which they were relying on hugely, are blown away by the need for 900Kg of batteries !!! which will be dead cells over time.. which will need replacing at huge cost financially and in energy terms.. and burying in the earth..
What makes you think the batteries will be buried?

They can all be successfully re-cycled.

SS7

shoestring7

6,138 posts

247 months

Thursday 16th October 2008
quotequote all
odyssey2200 said:
Seriously though guys

How many of us would have bought a car that costs £60,000 and had a limeted fuel range, could not be topped up in a filling station to continue your journey and had to be connected over night before it could be used again?

For just over half that you could but an Elise and drive around the world, as long as you couyld fund one of the Millions of petrol stations out there.
Seriously though...the very first motor cars cost as much as a decent house, were only owned by the very very rich and had a very limited range, and look how much they cost now.

That pattern is typical of new technologies and Tesla are brave to launch to early adopters. In due course fully electric cars and PIH's will become more affordable and at £15k I imagine will dominate the market. Why buy a 50mpg family hatchback when you can get a 150mpg equivalent for the same money?

SS7

odyssey2200

18,650 posts

210 months

Thursday 16th October 2008
quotequote all
shoestring7 said:
odyssey2200 said:
Seriously though guys

How many of us would have bought a car that costs £60,000 and had a limited fuel range, could not be topped up in a filling station to continue your journey and had to be connected over night before it could be used again?

For just over half that you could but an Elise and drive around the world, as long as you could fund one of the Millions of petrol stations out there.
Seriously though...the very first motor cars cost as much as a decent house, were only owned by the very very rich and had a very limited range, and look how much they cost now.

That pattern is typical of new technologies and Tesla are brave to launch to early adopters. In due course fully electric cars and PIH's will become more affordable and at £15k I imagine will dominate the market. Why buy a 50mpg family hatchback when you can get a 150mpg equivalent for the same money?

SS7
i agree.

My point was that as a commercial proposition aiming at a minority segment (sports cars)was never going to yield as much success as making a car with broader appeal.

eg SWMBO commutes about 15 miles each way to work in Bath.
IF there had been an equally good looking electric hatch on the market we could have been tempted.

As it is we have 3 kids so a 2 seater is never going to make it on to our real world shopping list.

By the same token how many sports car owners taker their car to Le Mans each year?

The only Tesla owners at Le Mans would be those that live withing half the cars battery range.

How many Elise owners do spontaneous things like tour Scotland, Evo triangle, the "ring", Euro hoon etc.

There will be zero Tesla owners.

IMHO the characteristics and limitations of Battery power are at odds with a sports car.

I completely understand that from a marketing POV there is a lot of interest in an Electric sports car, which would have an "Halo effect" on the companies other products, but the company doesn't have any other products so they seen to have put the cars before the horse.







Edited by odyssey2200 on Thursday 16th October 14:28

krisles

81 posts

196 months

Thursday 16th October 2008
quotequote all
shoestring7 said:
odyssey2200 said:
Seriously though guys

How many of us would have bought a car that costs £60,000 and had a limeted fuel range, could not be topped up in a filling station to continue your journey and had to be connected over night before it could be used again?

For just over half that you could but an Elise and drive around the world, as long as you couyld fund one of the Millions of petrol stations out there.
Seriously though...the very first motor cars cost as much as a decent house, were only owned by the very very rich and had a very limited range, and look how much they cost now.

That pattern is typical of new technologies and Tesla are brave to launch to early adopters. In due course fully electric cars and PIH's will become more affordable and at £15k I imagine will dominate the market. Why buy a 50mpg family hatchback when you can get a 150mpg equivalent for the same money?

SS7
And don't forget. There were no petrol stations at that time. You had to buy the petrol at the pharmacy. And the engine needed a rebuild every 1000 miles or so (almost like my TVR redface).

Now the Tesla batteries are good for more then 1000 full charges with the 200 mile range per charge that means 200.000 miles. And at that point they still have about 60-70% of the original capacity. They are not dead and you can still do about 140 miles per charge.

I own a Tuscan and love the noise of my car but the funny thing is that I also love the silence of the Tesla. The price IMHO is not only acceptable but really good, for this early stage.

On the question how they get the 135mpg with no gallons to count. Energy is measured in J (Joule) and it is exactly known what is the energy value of 1 gallon of petrol as it ist for the 1Wh of electricity. So thats how they can compare.



odyssey2200

18,650 posts

210 months

Thursday 16th October 2008
quotequote all
krisles said:
shoestring7 said:
odyssey2200 said:
Seriously though guys

How many of us would have bought a car that costs £60,000 and had a limeted fuel range, could not be topped up in a filling station to continue your journey and had to be connected over night before it could be used again?

For just over half that you could but an Elise and drive around the world, as long as you couyld fund one of the Millions of petrol stations out there.
Seriously though...the very first motor cars cost as much as a decent house, were only owned by the very very rich and had a very limited range, and look how much they cost now.

That pattern is typical of new technologies and Tesla are brave to launch to early adopters. In due course fully electric cars and PIH's will become more affordable and at £15k I imagine will dominate the market. Why buy a 50mpg family hatchback when you can get a 150mpg equivalent for the same money?

SS7
And don't forget. There were no petrol stations at that time. You had to buy the petrol at the pharmacy. And the engine needed a rebuild every 1000 miles or so (almost like my TVR redface).

Now the Tesla batteries are good for more then 1000 full charges with the 200 mile range per charge that means 200.000 miles. And at that point they still have about 60-70% of the original capacity. They are not dead and you can still do about 140 miles per charge.

I own a Tuscan and love the noise of my car but the funny thing is that I also love the silence of the Tesla. The price IMHO is not only acceptable but really good, for this early stage.

On the question how they get the 135mpg with no gallons to count. Energy is measured in J (Joule) and it is exactly known what is the energy value of 1 gallon of petrol as it ist for the 1Wh of electricity. So thats how they can compare.
There were no petrol stations back then, that is true, but people and society were not dependant on their cars like we are today.
No one commuted from the M4 corridor into London daily or took driving holidays to the south of France etc.

And if the range is 200 miles the you had better not plan any journey of more that 100 miles if you intend comming home after dark!

Imagine if every time you took you Tuscan out you had to head for home after 100 miles or sooner if it was getting a bit late and then you could not use it for a few hours.




Edited by odyssey2200 on Thursday 16th October 18:40


Edited by odyssey2200 on Thursday 16th October 18:40

Sundeep

537 posts

239 months

Thursday 16th October 2008
quotequote all
sounds like Tesla has gone flat


whistle

Dubmaster77

172 posts

194 months

Friday 17th October 2008
quotequote all
odyssey2200 said:
krisles said:
shoestring7 said:
odyssey2200 said:
Seriously though guys

How many of us would have bought a car that costs £60,000 and had a limeted fuel range, could not be topped up in a filling station to continue your journey and had to be connected over night before it could be used again?

For just over half that you could but an Elise and drive around the world, as long as you couyld fund one of the Millions of petrol stations out there.
Seriously though...the very first motor cars cost as much as a decent house, were only owned by the very very rich and had a very limited range, and look how much they cost now.

That pattern is typical of new technologies and Tesla are brave to launch to early adopters. In due course fully electric cars and PIH's will become more affordable and at £15k I imagine will dominate the market. Why buy a 50mpg family hatchback when you can get a 150mpg equivalent for the same money?

SS7
And don't forget. There were no petrol stations at that time. You had to buy the petrol at the pharmacy. And the engine needed a rebuild every 1000 miles or so (almost like my TVR redface).

Now the Tesla batteries are good for more then 1000 full charges with the 200 mile range per charge that means 200.000 miles. And at that point they still have about 60-70% of the original capacity. They are not dead and you can still do about 140 miles per charge.

I own a Tuscan and love the noise of my car but the funny thing is that I also love the silence of the Tesla. The price IMHO is not only acceptable but really good, for this early stage.

On the question how they get the 135mpg with no gallons to count. Energy is measured in J (Joule) and it is exactly known what is the energy value of 1 gallon of petrol as it ist for the 1Wh of electricity. So thats how they can compare.
There were no petrol stations back then, that is true, but people and society were not dependant on their cars like we are today.
No one commuted from the M4 corridor into London daily or took driving holidays to the south of France etc.

And if the range is 200 miles the you had better not plan any journey of more that 100 miles if you intend comming home after dark!

Imagine if every time you took you Tuscan out you had to head for home after 100 miles or sooner if it was getting a bit late and then you could not use it for a few hours.




Edited by odyssey2200 on Thursday 16th October 18:40


Edited by odyssey2200 on Thursday 16th October 18:40
I imagine most Tuscan owners know that feeling anyway!! Joke!!

shoestring7

6,138 posts

247 months

Friday 17th October 2008
quotequote all
odyssey2200 said:
krisles said:
shoestring7 said:
odyssey2200 said:
Seriously though guys

How many of us would have bought a car that costs £60,000 and had a limeted fuel range, could not be topped up in a filling station to continue your journey and had to be connected over night before it could be used again?

For just over half that you could but an Elise and drive around the world, as long as you couyld fund one of the Millions of petrol stations out there.
Seriously though...the very first motor cars cost as much as a decent house, were only owned by the very very rich and had a very limited range, and look how much they cost now.

That pattern is typical of new technologies and Tesla are brave to launch to early adopters. In due course fully electric cars and PIH's will become more affordable and at £15k I imagine will dominate the market. Why buy a 50mpg family hatchback when you can get a 150mpg equivalent for the same money?

SS7
And don't forget. There were no petrol stations at that time. You had to buy the petrol at the pharmacy. And the engine needed a rebuild every 1000 miles or so (almost like my TVR redface).

Now the Tesla batteries are good for more then 1000 full charges with the 200 mile range per charge that means 200.000 miles. And at that point they still have about 60-70% of the original capacity. They are not dead and you can still do about 140 miles per charge.

I own a Tuscan and love the noise of my car but the funny thing is that I also love the silence of the Tesla. The price IMHO is not only acceptable but really good, for this early stage.

On the question how they get the 135mpg with no gallons to count. Energy is measured in J (Joule) and it is exactly known what is the energy value of 1 gallon of petrol as it ist for the 1Wh of electricity. So thats how they can compare.
There were no petrol stations back then, that is true, but people and society were not dependant on their cars like we are today.
No one commuted from the M4 corridor into London daily or took driving holidays to the south of France etc.

And if the range is 200 miles the you had better not plan any journey of more that 100 miles if you intend comming home after dark!

Imagine if every time you took you Tuscan out you had to head for home after 100 miles or sooner if it was getting a bit late and then you could not use it for a few hours.




Edited by odyssey2200 on Thursday 16th October 18:40


Edited by odyssey2200 on Thursday 16th October 18:40
ISTR that the official figures are that in the UK ~90% of journeys are less than 30 miles, and a significant proportion less that 5 miles. An electric car with a 200mile range is perfectly practical for the majority of current car trips.

SS7

Frik

13,542 posts

244 months

Friday 17th October 2008
quotequote all
Agreed. Akin to a good bike range really. A bit like riding a two stroke.

I'd be more concerned about the silent running. Apparently it's quite disconcerting driving it in town - everyone just steps out in front of you.

odyssey2200

18,650 posts

210 months

Friday 17th October 2008
quotequote all
I'll see all you Tesla supporters at Le man next year thenthumbup


mike_1985

357 posts

192 months

Saturday 18th October 2008
quotequote all
Wilburo said:
This is a real shame - sure it didn't have Pistons, but showed that sexy cars had a future. A far more exciting green prospect than anything Lexus is going to make.
Which other petrol 4x4 can do 30 mpg+ in town ?

Gotta say I am quite dissapointed about the all so precious sound of cars . Let me tell you something, most cars sound like a bag of poo, thats if you ever heard one . There are a few exceptions but nothing that mere mortals can afford unless you happen to drive a silly saxo with a magnex exhaust and think thats exotic.

And no , you shouldn't be able to hear any 5+sec car from miles away



Edited by mike_1985 on Saturday 18th October 02:20

flat16

345 posts

235 months

Tuesday 17th March 2009
quotequote all
The plot thickens: Tesla Spies on its Employees

paulrockliffe

15,718 posts

228 months

Thursday 19th March 2009
quotequote all
Afternoon, no real opinion on electric technology or Tesla, but I was reading in new Scientist this week about new battery technology. The charging problem is that with a lithium-ion battery the charging process has to remove lithium from the cathode to the anode, which takes time.

A new technology involves coating lithium ions in carbon, presumably that stops binding to the cathode, they quoted typical charge times for a mobile phone of 10 seconds and about 10 mins for a car.

So perhaps there is a future in batteries.