RE: Lotus Terminates European Dealer Network

RE: Lotus Terminates European Dealer Network

Author
Discussion

odyssey2200

18,650 posts

209 months

Thursday 8th July 2010
quotequote all
noclue said:
In times when cash is tight overheads are the first thing a company looks at. Lotus probably believe that the people buying Lotuses have already made thier mind up this is the marque for them even before they hit a dealer and that they will retain 95% of the sales they get direct cutting out the middle man
are you assuming that Lotus will sell direct?

nono

IMHO this is a prelude to rebuildingthe network as an upmarket brand.

new dealer standards will demand that dealers have nicer showrooms with a new corporate identity etc.

If there is not enough volume or profit in the franchise dealers will tell them to go fk themselves.

rev-erend

21,415 posts

284 months

Thursday 8th July 2010
quotequote all
Nice to treat the loyalty shown by the dealers in the tough
times they had endured in the last 2 years.

I expect those that remain are actually relieved and can go
find new dealerships that are more profitable.

Looks like Lotus is heading for very tough times .. AGAIN.

ads_green

838 posts

232 months

Thursday 8th July 2010
quotequote all
Exactly.

I can't see any problems with established dealers - Ones I have used such as Christopher Neils, Bell and Colvill and Murray in Edinburgh would be fine.


bertie

8,550 posts

284 months

Thursday 8th July 2010
quotequote all
Frimley111R said:
People would absolutely pay £100k for a Lotus if it had flashy showrooms and great build along with all the main attributes of any Lotus. This is step 1...
Really? Honestly?

I can't.

It's like Tesco trying to compete with Dolce & Gabana, or Peugeot / Renault trying to compete with BMW / Mercedes, it's just never going to work.
Ford abandoned the mid size exec market as they realised it didn't matter how good a Scorpio was, it was never going to compete with a 5 series / E class. It might not be right but it is reality.

There isn't enough volume these days for Aston / Lambo / Ferrari / Bentley to maintain sales.
Aston are not back to running full time and the Aston brand is a whole lot stronger than Lotus.

I wish Lotus well, but this policy is madness.

Tuna

19,930 posts

284 months

Thursday 8th July 2010
quotequote all
bertie said:
Aston are not back to running full time and the Aston brand is a whole lot stronger than Lotus.
The brand may be good, but I'm not sure Aston have the right mix of cars in the current market. It seems to me that their attempt at a 'city car' is embarrassing and the rest of the range is too narrow.

Whether this is a good business decision, only time will tell. It's amazing though, the number of people on this site that appear to believe that the current changes are being made on a whim and without a whole load of analysis, not least from the majority owner. Lotus has to change - their European dealer network is a joke and their bread and butter model is selling into an increasingly saturated market.

Current public opinion doesn't have faith in even a slightly upmarket Lotus (the Evora) despite it being a great competitor in that segment - so the company is boxed in. They certainly can't go cheaper, and without repositioning the brand they can't broaden their range up market. Once again, it's make or break time, and they have to do more than just produce excellent cars - they have to change the way they engage with their customers at every level.

Puddenchucker

4,093 posts

218 months

Thursday 8th July 2010
quotequote all
Frimley111R said:
If you think they can't make it look at Alfa a few years ago, look at Skoda and Seat to see how far any manufacturer can come.
Yes, but they had the support/engineering (and corporate parts bins) of much larger and profitable parent companies.
For example, many Skodas & Seats are reworkings of VW/Audi models. Lotus doesn't have that luxury with its present owner.

Frimley111R said:
People would absolutely pay £100k for a Lotus if it had flashy showrooms and great build along with all the main attributes of any Lotus.
So Lotus is, effectively, going to dump its existing customer base and chase those in a much more rarefied area of the market?
I'm not saying it can't/won't happen, but it's a very big leap to go from flogging circa £30k cars that sell to enthusiasts to peddling £100+k cars that have to compete on all levels with Ferrari/Lamborghini/Porsche.

I wish them well, but fear they could be a small fish in a small pond already populated by sharks.

Agem

132 posts

165 months

Thursday 8th July 2010
quotequote all
Will effect the Dealerships in China?

Agem

132 posts

165 months

Thursday 8th July 2010
quotequote all
I belive that Lotus gets $50 for use of their name on every car sold............Making this Hethels most profitable car EVER!

MX7

7,902 posts

174 months

Thursday 8th July 2010
quotequote all
2 years? So, that's 2 years of zero enthusiasm that they will get from their European outlets. I'd have thought that a last minute "failed to live up to our expectations" letter would make more sense. Still, I'm sure she knows what she's doing.

Perra

779 posts

175 months

Thursday 8th July 2010
quotequote all
Puddenchucker said:
So Lotus is, effectively, going to dump its existing customer base and chase those in a much more rarefied area of the market?
I'm not saying it can't/won't happen, but it's a very big leap to go from flogging circa £30k cars that sell to enthusiasts to peddling £100+k cars that have to compete on all levels with Ferrari/Lamborghini/Porsche.

I wish them well, but fear they could be a small fish in a small pond already populated by sharks.
I think they will be fine to be honest. When i think of Lotus i think of small fast track cars as I'm sure most people do, they have being doing these types of cars for decades, so they have pedigree, much like Ferrari/Lamborghini/Porsche.

People buy Ferrari/Lamborghini/Porsche cars due to prestige/pedigree, statistics, looks and how lavish they are. I feel that Lotus have most of these categories except how lavish they are. If they made a bigger more lavish car, just increase the power and bump up the price. I honestly do think they could do well, if it's a nice car and it's fast you can't argue with it's price (as they do have pedigree).

Yea or nay?

tridave

249 posts

203 months

Thursday 8th July 2010
quotequote all
Frimley111R said:
Greg_D said:
cqueen said:
bertie said:
My main problem is if I was going to spend the thick end of 100 large on a car, would I be thinking Lotus.........err, no.
Maybe not in it's current format...

Edited by cqueen on Thursday 8th July 17:17
Exactly, who would have thought that people would fall over themselves to spend £50k+ on a Nissan

But i do agree though, the signs aren't good

Greg
How are signs not good? For the first time (almost ever) they have a decent management team, very high level consultants and realise that making excellent but niche cars which are falling too far behind on quality and development is only going to send them one way. If you think they can't make it look at Alfa a few years ago, look at Skoda and Seat to see how far any manufacturer can come. People would absolutely pay £100k for a Lotus if it had flashy showrooms and great build along with all the main attributes of any Lotus. This is step 1...
A decent management team :/ time will tell, proton need very deeeeeeeeeeeeep pockets, I just hope they are in it for the long term.

peter450

1,650 posts

233 months

Friday 9th July 2010
quotequote all
Bottom line is Proton are clearly investing some money to make this work, and Lotus's has not really been very profitable in the past 10 years despite the massive and unexpected success of the Elise

It's clear something needs to be done and for a low volume maker, there is no chance of being competive at the bottom end of the market, it took a ground breaking car like the elise to get lotus decent sales, and even here they still did not really make much money

Small volume car companies need to sell expensive cars, selling cheaper ones, the case just does not add up, i do however hope lotus keep a small lightweight sports car in the lineup, but for the company to ever have a chance of being profitable they need to look at porsche, as in having the majority of there profit comming from high margin, expensive cars

Edited by peter450 on Friday 9th July 01:28

RTH

1,057 posts

212 months

Friday 9th July 2010
quotequote all
They cannot rely on Proton for ever.
Proton themselves are in losses in recent years and are effectively kept afloat by the Malaysian government and oil revenues.

Dr Evil

54 posts

278 months

Friday 9th July 2010
quotequote all
Well I think we are just worried that these guys are going to ruin Lotus. Top of the market is extremely crowded, and Lotus can't really compete with that kind of fit and finish without spyker prices tags. But they practically own the small exotic sportscar segment where most of us enthusiasts have a chance of buying into. Shouldn't they be evolving the elise format to keep it current? Porsche did that with the 911 for what 40 years?

If they go into Porsche/Ferrari territory, they will be abandoning core customers as well as their USP. Good luck to them. I hope they know what they are doing.

In the meatime, I'm ordered a Caterham Roadsport. Back to basics!


ctallchris

1,266 posts

179 months

Friday 9th July 2010
quotequote all
bertie said:
My main problem is if I was going to spend the thick end of 100 large on a car, would I be thinking Lotus.........err, no.
I seriously think if they are doing this they are going to put themselves in the firing line of mclaren.

Lightwight highly strung brittish sportscars both are charging into the market and i think mclaren have the edge on the name. Lotus however could easilly compete with porsche and aston for building true drivers cars.


sprinter1050

11,550 posts

227 months

Friday 9th July 2010
quotequote all
Is this in any way linked to the return to F1 of the Lotus name?

Where exactly has the dosh come from to run that team- Proton? and "others".

Just wondering.

Agem

132 posts

165 months

Friday 9th July 2010
quotequote all

A Scotsman

1,000 posts

199 months

Friday 9th July 2010
quotequote all
Dany Bahar has an MBA. Lotus is doomed. It will become all process and no progress. Pity really but they'll no doubt learn from the experience and return to their roots in a few years time.

cathalm

606 posts

244 months

Friday 9th July 2010
quotequote all
Same responses as the last article on this subject. I despair of PH.

Alfa numeric

3,026 posts

179 months

Friday 9th July 2010
quotequote all
Morgan have branched upwards recently- the Aeromax model is over £100k and noone's batted an eyelid. They've not stopped building the cheaper models though- hopefully Lotus's model is somewhat similar.

I'd hate to see it go under.