RE: Coventry Company Buys Out Spyker

RE: Coventry Company Buys Out Spyker

Author
Discussion

TheOrangePeril

778 posts

181 months

Thursday 24th February 2011
quotequote all
So basically, all that hype about returning the quirk to Saab has now dissipated and Spyker (cars-wise) are now moving to be a British parts-bin vendor?

Not meaning to sound cynical but I'm not enthralled by the newly instated prospects for Saab (if Spyker wasn't profitable enough on its own to bother retaining the brand, what hope have they got switching to an entirely different market with an ailing company?), it seems that the only way that Spyker N.V. can capitalise on this is to push Saab further up the luxury (bespoke niche?) market to milk their previous expertise, but that's hardly going to happen considering the debt pressure to increase volume (as promised).

Very concerning for Saab but all the best for Spyker, I really do hope they manage to make the magic happen with their new owners.

(p.s. don't get me wrong, I'm excited about the GM lumps too but it's one step towards thrift and volume that may lead to others. Let's hope this is just paranoia on my part!)

B10

1,244 posts

268 months

Thursday 24th February 2011
quotequote all
The Spyker website press release says:
"CPP Global Holdings
Spyker Cars N.V.– the EURONEXT-listed holding company which operates the Spyker and Saab Automobile premium car brands – has signed a Memorandum of Understanding to sell the assets of its Spyker sportscar business (the “Spyker Business”) to a private UK holding company, CPP Global Holdings
Limited, which is owned by Vladimir Antonov."

I thought that Brendan O’Toole was one of the owners or is he an owner of a subsiduary of the holding company? It all seems like an accountancy trick.

TheOrangePeril

778 posts

181 months

Thursday 24th February 2011
quotequote all
(p.p.s. that was a reference to the GM lumps to be installed in the new Spykers, not those from the old Saabs...)

A Scotsman

1,000 posts

200 months

Thursday 24th February 2011
quotequote all
dandarez said:
Ha ha.
We may well be the sixth largest manufacturing country in the world (not long ago we were the fourth!), but you need to go out and check just how much of it is owned and run by 'us'?

Virtually bugger all now!

So, reality is that it is NOT our industries. It gives employment which is about the only good thing, BUT there is a massive downside - a foreign-owned British company can suddenly decide to 'up and go', as has happened.

Edited by dandarez on Thursday 24th February 15:08
Good.. Someone else had woken up to the point that it's the control you get with ownership that really matters.

A Scotsman

1,000 posts

200 months

Thursday 24th February 2011
quotequote all
Do CPP have a website? Darned if I can find it.

dinkel

26,966 posts

259 months

Thursday 24th February 2011
quotequote all
http://www.fd.nl/artikel/21501776/spyker-wil-sport...

Antonov wants to buy as Muller wants to sell and concentrate on the SAAB adventure:

http://www.spykercars.nl/?pag=50&jaar=&nid...

Edited by dinkel on Thursday 24th February 15:51

Dunclane

1,227 posts

170 months

Thursday 24th February 2011
quotequote all
A Scotsman said:
Do CPP have a website? Darned if I can find it.
http://www.cpp-uk.com/

HTH

M666 EVO

1,124 posts

163 months

Thursday 24th February 2011
quotequote all
The Hypno-Toad said:
It wasn't actually a Family Guy reference, its a Bill Hicks reference but same difference. wink
How's it looking over there Ollie?

I'M AT THE WRONG AIRPORT!!!

groomi

9,317 posts

244 months

Thursday 24th February 2011
quotequote all
So Coventry has a manufacturer again! bounce

B10

1,244 posts

268 months

Thursday 24th February 2011
quotequote all
A Scotsman said:
dandarez said:
Ha ha.
We may well be the sixth largest manufacturing country in the world (not long ago we were the fourth!), but you need to go out and check just how much of it is owned and run by 'us'?

Virtually bugger all now!

So, reality is that it is NOT our industries. It gives employment which is about the only good thing, BUT there is a massive downside - a foreign-owned British company can suddenly decide to 'up and go', as has happened.

Edited by dandarez on Thursday 24th February 15:08
Good.. Someone else had woken up to the point that it's the control you get with ownership that really matters.
I agree about ownership. I have ranted about this on PH for years! I work for a UK owned manufacturing company and we are expanding. Lets be positive. UK manufacturing is part of the future prosperity of this country so lets support it rather than continually running it down. Stop the city from making a quick quid on flogging a company, eg Cadbury. Start encouraging science and engineering. Rant over for now!

A Scotsman

1,000 posts

200 months

Thursday 24th February 2011
quotequote all
Dunclane said:
A Scotsman said:
Do CPP have a website? Darned if I can find it.
http://www.cpp-uk.com/

HTH
Ta nicely.

danger mouse

3,828 posts

262 months

Thursday 24th February 2011
quotequote all
B10 said:
The Spyker website press release says:
"CPP Global Holdings
Spyker Cars N.V.– the EURONEXT-listed holding company which operates the Spyker and Saab Automobile premium car brands – has signed a Memorandum of Understanding to sell the assets of its Spyker sportscar business (the “Spyker Business”) to a private UK holding company, CPP Global Holdings
Limited, which is owned by Vladimir Antonov."

I thought that Brendan O’Toole was one of the owners or is he an owner of a subsiduary of the holding company? It all seems like an accountancy trick.
:heartsinks:

Well at least CPP are big company, and employer (Yes Groomi, how're you doing BTW mate?) of West Mercian artisans, with their fingers in many corporate pies so hopefully they aren't just in this to gain a prestigious jewel in their crown so burdensome they get pulled headfirst into the ground by it.

Still keeping fingers crossed, but compelled to hear the naysayers song 'cause it sounds eerily familiar.

Is it too late to tie Brendan to his mast??

Edited by danger mouse on Thursday 24th February 16:36

amzamz

22 posts

167 months

Thursday 24th February 2011
quotequote all
... have a look at the SpykerOwner website for some more discussion. It is here
http://www.spykerowner.com/forum/spyker-discussion...

I am sure the move is not only a financial trick. Behind it you can find car enthusiasts, like Victor Muller and others, who care about the brand, and would like it to survive. Spyker could be long dead, or never born without them! biglaugh

Hellbound

2,500 posts

177 months

Thursday 24th February 2011
quotequote all
In other news, Spyker showcase electric and hybrid city car concepts at this years Paris Motor Show.

Just joshing.

It does sound like a money shuffle if it's true about who owns the majority of shares.

BUT does that mean SAAB have now lost their exotic association with Spyker?

Hellbound

2,500 posts

177 months

Thursday 24th February 2011
quotequote all
I don't care that much about the nationalities of who owns what and where.

Job creation and future proof inward investment matter far more than where the owners were born.

B10

1,244 posts

268 months

Thursday 24th February 2011
quotequote all
Hellbound said:
I don't care that much about the nationalities of who owns what and where.

Job creation and future proof inward investment matter far more than where the owners were born.
I wish people would talk about internal investment first, then inward investment. We should be supporting UK business FIRST then encouraging inward investment second.

timewatch

881 posts

195 months

Thursday 24th February 2011
quotequote all
B10 said:
Grow up or post on TG's website.
Really!

Don't think I'm alone on this forum thinking the same, unless you read it differently, Mr Censor??????

I'm entitled to my opinion that's what these forums are about!

TW>>>





B10

1,244 posts

268 months

Thursday 24th February 2011
quotequote all
timewatch said:
Really!

Don't think I'm alone on this forum thinking the same, unless you read it differently, Mr Censor??????

I'm entitled to my opinion that's what these forums are about!

TW>>>
Would you like mummy to kiss it better for you?
Swearing and making crass comments about British industry are a bit juvenile. Perhaps more considered comments would garner a better response.

Eviltad

1,320 posts

180 months

Thursday 24th February 2011
quotequote all
groomi said:
So Coventry has a manufacturer again! bounce
Besides Jag Land Rover?

I think its great news. Admittedly it does seem like a financial shuffle but its another feather in cap for the engineers of Whitley area.

groomi

9,317 posts

244 months

Thursday 24th February 2011
quotequote all
Eviltad said:
Besides Jag Land Rover?

I think its great news. Admittedly it does seem like a financial shuffle but its another feather in cap for the engineers of Whitley area.
I was referring to the fact that no cars are currently built in Coventry for a Coventry based company - once the epicentre of the British motor industry. Even Peugeot upped and left a few years ago.

Jaguar only have a design/engineering centre in Whitley (Coventry), Land Rover is further away at Gaydon.