ebay fake whirlwind hoses, advice please

ebay fake whirlwind hoses, advice please

Author
Discussion

jev

384 posts

261 months

Friday 1st August 2014
quotequote all
greenracing said:
As I understand it, you can't apply design rights to the "must fit" parts of the pipes, in this case the two ends, however, the eBay seller in this instance didn't have to follow what looks to be the same design to connect the two ends so therefore as the part was specifically designed to improve performance and specifically designed in this shape that is significantly different to the "everyday" item, it is covered. Whether the part is seen or not seen externally makes no difference as far as I am aware......
The problem is that the term "design rights" is ambiguous. You are generally correct re UK Unregistered Design Right (which is what I was talking about in my first post)

However, the law of registered design (my second post) (and indeed Community Unregistered Design) is completely different and requires that a "component part of a complex product" only meets the requirements of novelty and individual character (ie. can only be valid) if visible in normal use.

greenracing

259 posts

172 months

Friday 1st August 2014
quotequote all
Understand now!

N7GTX

7,877 posts

144 months

Friday 1st August 2014
quotequote all
This is a complex subject but to give an example, my colleague made a camera track that he sold via eBay. A few weeks later and another seller was on there with an identical looking bit of kit.
We decided to take the other seller to the county court using Moneyclaim Online for a copyright infringement. We did not know much about this.
At the first hearing the judge advised the correct wording and that an expert's advice should be sought. This we did and after contacting an expert in this field, he drafted the claim.
Back to court and the judge awarded judgement against the other seller, to cease production, to pay an award (several thousand £s) and costs all round.
The seller paid up over some 6 months and then offered all his parts to us as he had no use for them.
If this is a direct copy of your original idea, that has been for sale (first eBay listing date for example) or in production for longer than the other seller (you will be able to show the dates), then you have 'rights' so I would advise you seek proper advice. It certainly worked for us.

Barkychoc

7,848 posts

205 months

Friday 1st August 2014
quotequote all
You could try reporting them to ebay as a trade seller using a private selling account - I wouldn't hold your breath but it might put a spanner in the works for a bit.

V41LEY

2,895 posts

239 months

Friday 1st August 2014
quotequote all
Can't you buy one but leave negative feedback about it being a fake ?

spitfire4v8

Original Poster:

3,992 posts

182 months

Friday 1st August 2014
quotequote all
Had a few informative messages today and the same name has cropped up in all of them so it now looks like I know who it is.

Gazzab

21,108 posts

283 months

Friday 1st August 2014
quotequote all
Good luck joolz

Gazzab

21,108 posts

283 months

Friday 1st August 2014
quotequote all
Sent the seller a message asking why he's ripping off others products...

Cerbieherts

1,651 posts

142 months

Friday 1st August 2014
quotequote all
Bloody terrible. I had something similar happen to me several years ago for a product I developed for the Ferrari 360. In my case, it was being copied abroad and there was little I could do. Good luck, hope you manage to put a spanner in the works for them!

QuiteQuietCerb

994 posts

224 months

Friday 1st August 2014
quotequote all
assume that someone bought those hoses (i wouldnt btw), would fitting them have any positive impact on the way their car drives? would it not need a remap anyway? if it does you could argue that remaping that car with those hoses would be a no go as they form an integral part of the the way the car performs plus reliability

jackwibble

664 posts

160 months

Friday 1st August 2014
quotequote all
Alternatively I could send the 'Boys' around Joolz if you wish?

Byker28i

60,142 posts

218 months

Saturday 2nd August 2014
quotequote all
The way I read those adverts is that someone has got themselves a trade account with a hose manufacturer?

spitfire4v8

Original Poster:

3,992 posts

182 months

Saturday 2nd August 2014
quotequote all
yep and you don't have to dig far to find they've bought from ebay seller auto performance, the ebay presence of ASH hoses. Whether that is significant right now though I don't know.
Thing is, to make hoses you need a mould, so someone has paid for a mould to be made to make the hoses. I have had 3 moulds, one is with the manufacturer I first used who were great but very slow getting things made. I stopped ordering from them but they still had my mould (i paid for it though so technically it's still mine)
I have had two more moulds made but one went missing which stopped production of my own hoses a while ago whilst another mould was made,or the original found, I don't know which.
These moulds are 250 pounds each, so no small money when the total sales of the product are so low. I've spent 750 pounds on moulds so far so you can understand why I'm a bit peeved when someone starts up with something that looks so similar ..
I'll come to the unusual ebay feedback later ..

mickk

28,903 posts

243 months

Saturday 2nd August 2014
quotequote all
Would they not have purchased the original Whirlwind hoses from yourself to make the moulds in the first place?

Surely they must have something to copy.

spitfire4v8

Original Poster:

3,992 posts

182 months

Sunday 3rd August 2014
quotequote all
I will know how much of a copy it is once i've taken a silicone mould of the internal shaping. There's plenty of my hoses about though, they haven't (to my knowledge) bought any hoses directly off me but they do turn up secondhand off salvage cars for example.

julian64

14,317 posts

255 months

Monday 4th August 2014
quotequote all
I can tell you know the pipe on the left hand end of that water kit wont fit. The one that goes up to the top of the radiator.

Its a complex double turn and their pipe is simply straight. The thermistat would be at all sorts of funny angles and the pipe would be twisted to buggery.

Doesn't help you I'm afraid.

I do have a question while your here though.

I have a your chip with a whirlwind and cat bypass.

For the MOT each year I have to put the cats back on. Would I be better off leaving your chip in or switching back to the original ecu chip for the MOT?

spitfire4v8

Original Poster:

3,992 posts

182 months

Monday 4th August 2014
quotequote all
If it's just a generic whirlwind chip then you can leave it in. All the part throttle stuff is as per original and still all under lambda control, so it should behave the same at MOT time whichever chip you have fitted.