New member, old cerb

New member, old cerb

Author
Discussion

gruffalo

7,521 posts

226 months

Sunday 26th October 2014
quotequote all
I believe RND looked at converting a Ford head or something like that, I don't believe they ever got it working.

VVT I don't think so.

jamieduff1981

8,025 posts

140 months

Monday 27th October 2014
quotequote all
Honestly - just get it working properly before thinking of new ways to make it not work properly.

It's your car and all that but I'd strongly recommend focusing your energy on resolving the existing issues correctly so that you are at least in the position to make educated choices about the car thereafter.

It doesn't need 4 valve heads nor VVT. With vanishingly few exceptions, everyone who reinvents the same old radical ideas which have never worked before just ends up with a ruined car and/or a pile of bits. If you don't have time to set up the throttles you don't have time to rebuild the engine let alone convert it to 4 valve heads. And you still have no idea what a working Cerbera is actually like so I'm struggling to understand the desire to mess with it rather than just fix it.

If it needs a rebuild, then for the car's sake give it to APM, Powers or Str8six to rebuild and set up properly.

Sorry to sound harsh, but as a reader this thread is screaming for a reality check.

Supateg

744 posts

142 months

Monday 27th October 2014
quotequote all
jamieduff1981 said:
Honestly - just get it working properly before thinking of new ways to make it not work properly.

It's your car and all that but I'd strongly recommend focusing your energy on resolving the existing issues correctly so that you are at least in the position to make educated choices about the car thereafter.

It doesn't need 4 valve heads nor VVT. With vanishingly few exceptions, everyone who reinvents the same old radical ideas which have never worked before just ends up with a ruined car and/or a pile of bits. If you don't have time to set up the throttles you don't have time to rebuild the engine let alone convert it to 4 valve heads. And you still have no idea what a working Cerbera is actually like so I'm struggling to understand the desire to mess with it rather than just fix it.

If it needs a rebuild, then for the car's sake give it to APM, Powers or Str8six to rebuild and set up properly.

Sorry to sound harsh, but as a reader this thread is screaming for a reality check.
Wise words there,
I would add jools to the list of places to take the car for setting up. Maybe at the same time have a leak down test.
Without more data on the health of the engine; tuning ideas are lost.
First rule of tuning is make sure the engine is healthy enough to take the extra stress.
But that's my opinion.

scerbera

Original Poster:

102 posts

114 months

Monday 27th October 2014
quotequote all
Don't worry chaps, I am actually an engine designer. I work on/design engines everyday!

I have no experience of the AJP unit which is the reason for many of my questions.

I would say the car is quicker just from taking the bad throttle pot out of the equation. I had a couple of brilliant blasts on the weekend and the engine was better, but it still drinks oil badly.

So a rebuild is definitely needed one way or the other unless i just live with the oil problem.


I am just starting to enjoy the car but there are plenty of things that could be improved in my opinion of course engine related.

I am insanely busy until feb march on an absolutely brilliant project but when the weather turns for the worse I will strip her and see whats what. It's on the original crank so that is on the list to be swapped regardless.

This is a fun car for me and so i'm open to anything. I'm just putting some ideas out there!

ukkid35

6,175 posts

173 months

Monday 27th October 2014
quotequote all
scerbera said:
Has anyone ever done anything crazy like make a 4 valve head, add in vvt or anything?
I think this is the thread you were looking for

http://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?t=120...

scerbera

Original Poster:

102 posts

114 months

Monday 27th October 2014
quotequote all
Thanks ukkid35, interesting read.

ukkid35

6,175 posts

173 months

Tuesday 28th October 2014
quotequote all
Took me a while to accept that AJP8s were not suitable candidates for hydraulic tappets, even though some suppliers, such as Crane, now rate their 'lifters' to 7,400 rpm. I hate the labour intensive maintenance needed to keep these engines working properly, but I've come to accept that the AJP8 is such a beautifully insane engine that most faults are forgiven.

Supateg

744 posts

142 months

Tuesday 28th October 2014
quotequote all
scerbera said:
Don't worry chaps, I am actually an engine designer. I work on/design engines everyday!

I have no experience of the AJP unit which is the reason for many of my questions.

I would say the car is quicker just from taking the bad throttle pot out of the equation. I had a couple of brilliant blasts on the weekend and the engine was better, but it still drinks oil badly.

So a rebuild is definitely needed one way or the other unless i just live with the oil problem.


I am just starting to enjoy the car but there are plenty of things that could be improved in my opinion of course engine related.

I am insanely busy until feb march on an absolutely brilliant project but when the weather turns for the worse I will strip her and see whats what. It's on the original crank so that is on the list to be swapped regardless.

This is a fun car for me and so i'm open to anything. I'm just putting some ideas out there!
That's reassuring

I thought you were just mad!

........
Like the rest of us!


Edited by Supateg on Tuesday 28th October 07:50