The £100K 458...

[sone]

whoami said:

erics said:

Alpinestars said:

V car?

Crashed

Ah, that's why it's so "cheap" then...

For a V car id say its quite expensive!

[whoami]

sone said:

whoami said:

erics said:

Alpinestars said:

V car?

Crashed

Ah, that's why it's so "cheap" then...

For a V car id say its quite expensive!

Quite.

[rosino]

Aha!! Had missed the v car on my generous iPhone screen.. Nicely put at the end of the ad almost hidden :-)

Still.. If it's only stolen and recovered I wouldn't see too many issues. If it's Cat D and needed chassis to be straightened maybe it's a touch on the expensive side :-)

[tjob]

That car is a V car. So stolen recovered/cat D etc

[sone]

rosino said:

Aha!! Had missed the v car on my generous iPhone screen.. Nicely put at the end of the ad almost hidden :-)

Still.. If it's only stolen and recovered I wouldn't see too many issues. If it's Cat D and needed chassis to be straightened maybe it's a touch on the expensive side :-)

This is a Ferrari were talking about,it matters if it hasn't been washed every fortnight never mind if a V car(-:

[andymc]

maybe its a cat C. V car just means its on the accident register

[ZOLLAR]

That 458 isn't on MIAFTR2, it has no recorded write off against it.

There is no "V" anymore either.

Which is confusing as it says V car on the ad?

[sone]

ZOLLAR said:

That 458 isn't on MIAFTR2, it has no recorded write off against it.

There is no "V" anymore either.

Which is confusing as it says V car on the ad?

Apparently V car can relate to outstanding finance or stolen recovered so might not have been danaged at all. Sad thing is this thread will have devalued this car as ridicolous as it might be.

[ZOLLAR]

sone said:

ZOLLAR said:

That 458 isn't on MIAFTR2, it has no recorded write off against it.

There is no "V" anymore either.

Which is confusing as it says V car on the ad?

Apparently V car can relate to outstanding finance or stolen recovered so might not have been danaged at all. Sad thing is this thread will have devalued this car as ridicolous as it might be.

Damaged recovered would show on MIAFTR too, there's no record for it.
Good point on outstanding finance that's likely to be the reason.

[PHOENIXUK]

ZOLLAR said:

sone said:

ZOLLAR said:

That 458 isn't on MIAFTR2, it has no recorded write off against it.

There is no "V" anymore either.

Which is confusing as it says V car on the ad?

Apparently V car can relate to outstanding finance or stolen recovered so might not have been danaged at all. Sad thing is this thread will have devalued this car as ridicolous as it might be.

Damaged recovered would show on MIAFTR too, there's no record for it.
Good point on outstanding finance that's likely to be the reason.

Cant quite see the rational of saying the car is on V car in your advert if that only relates to outstanding finance as that would have to be settled anyhow... Not to mention until sold I would suspect more than 50% of such cars would have some type of finance on them should we be saeeing this V car notation on more adverts..?? I would suspect since the price is unrealistically low for such a car that the V relates to something more than 'outstanding finance'... IMHO of course..

[ZOLLAR]

PHOENIXUK said:

Cant quite see the rational of saying the car is on V car in your advert if that only relates to outstanding finance as that would have to be settled anyhow... Not to mention until sold I would suspect more than 50% of such cars would have some type of finance on them should we be saeeing this V car notation on more adverts..?? I would suspect since the price is unrealistically low for such a car that the V relates to something more than 'outstanding finance'... IMHO of course..

Yeah agree, very strange.
But the vehicle definetly has no marker against it!

[sone]

ZOLLAR said:

PHOENIXUK said:

Cant quite see the rational of saying the car is on V car in your advert if that only relates to outstanding finance as that would have to be settled anyhow... Not to mention until sold I would suspect more than 50% of such cars would have some type of finance on them should we be saeeing this V car notation on more adverts..?? I would suspect since the price is unrealistically low for such a car that the V relates to something more than 'outstanding finance'... IMHO of course..

Yeah agree, very strange.
But the vehicle definetly has no marker against it!

It has now, this thread will see to that!

[Dave211]

Only if the thread includes the reg number ..... Pistonheads Ads disappear over time.

[Juber]

Extremely reasonable I would say even though its a left hooker.

[aspirated]

Juber said:

Extremely reasonable I would say even though its a left hooker.

http://www.pistonheads.com/GASSING/topic.asp?h=0&t=1365952&d=0&nmt=


I'd stay well away, it's at the bottom end of the market for a reason..

[sone]

Never noticed its LHD as well. If it is a V car then it's starting to look expensive.

[Juber]

Thanks for clarifying. Ok, 2nd thoughts, that's rather expensive. Il give him £49k for it LOL

[sone]

I'd rather spend 50k on a straight 360(-:

[Juber]

LHD but straight 458 - with a bit of haggling its getting closer to £100k
http://www.pistonheads.com/classifieds/used-cars/f...

[KFC]

Juber said:

LHD but straight 458 - with a bit of haggling its getting closer to £100k
http://www.pistonheads.com/classifieds/used-cars/f...

I think that might be a bit ambitious...