Why belts...?

Author
Discussion

jayemm89

Original Poster:

4,025 posts

130 months

Thursday 18th December 2014
quotequote all
Watching a part of an old documentary on Youtube, regarding the Cosworth DFV. I noticed that it was entirely gear driven. This got me thinking, I know a few cars which are chain driven (i think all of my BMWs have been) but why is it that most engines use cambelts for timings, rather than gears? Is it a cost thing, or is there a benefit for a non-racing engine of having a belt?

Google didn't seem to turn up anything helpful with my searches. Pretty sure there will be a good reason, just curious what it is.

andyiley

9,199 posts

152 months

Thursday 18th December 2014
quotequote all
Quieter running & cheaper to manufacture

anonymous-user

54 months

Thursday 18th December 2014
quotequote all
Cost, alignment, noise. In that order

shoehorn

686 posts

143 months

Thursday 18th December 2014
quotequote all
jayemm89 said:
Watching a part of an old documentary on Youtube, regarding the Cosworth DFV. I noticed that it was entirely gear driven. This got me thinking, I know a few cars which are chain driven (i think all of my BMWs have been) but why is it that most engines use cambelts for timings, rather than gears? Is it a cost thing, or is there a benefit for a non-racing engine of having a belt?

Google didn't seem to turn up anything helpful with my searches. Pretty sure there will be a good reason, just curious what it is.
My Touareg had gear drive and was one of the only parts of the engine that didn`t suffer some sort of malfunction.
there are some engine with both belt and chain and I can think of at least one engine with chain,gears and belt,mental!

BigBo

212 posts

122 months

Thursday 18th December 2014
quotequote all
Quiet and can do the same job, Gear driven would be noisy, a Essex V6 with steel timing gear tends to sound supercharged, A lot of older especially German cars had chains with no issues apart from getting rattily when needing adjustment, would of always preferred chain but there's a lot of modern chin driven engines that seem to give trouble BMW/mini ect

Gear driven Looks pretty tho


Edited by BigBo on Thursday 18th December 20:38


Edited by BigBo on Thursday 18th December 20:40

S0 What

3,358 posts

172 months

Thursday 18th December 2014
quotequote all
Most modern cars with timing chains are not problem free, crank and cam sensor phase issues usually stem from a stretched chain, as for gears i've had both essex and cologne engines self destruct due to gear drives shattering at under 60K most timming belts will last 60K and are easyer and cheaperr to replace and they are quieter in general but that never stopped the pinto from sounding harsh at high revs (or even medium revs come to that) laugh

paintman

7,683 posts

190 months

Thursday 18th December 2014
quotequote all
Was that with the standard timing gears - fibre or nylon toothed - or the full steel ones?

Bennachie

1,090 posts

151 months

Friday 19th December 2014
quotequote all
Really modern kit uses the oil bath belt, where the belt is INSIDE the timing cover and runs in oil! Which used to be the death of belts............keeps the whole thing sealed and quiet.

Pothole

34,367 posts

282 months

Friday 19th December 2014
quotequote all
Honda made a feature of gear driven cams in a lot of their V4 bikes. Whiney though.

S0 What

3,358 posts

172 months

Friday 19th December 2014
quotequote all
paintman said:
Was that with the standard timing gears - fibre or nylon toothed - or the full steel ones?
The standard factory fibre ones, i tried the steel ones in an Essex but they whined more than the wife laugh
Belts are the best way to deal with infrquent oil changes IMHO as it has no impact on them unlike gears or chains, one less thing to be affected by an owners tightfistesdness, the downside is that same tightfistesdness can destroy an engine if a belt snaps but i find people are more inclined to take a hit in the wallet every few years for a belt shange rather than every year for a service! i see a lot of cam belt changes that really REALLY need an oil change but talking a customer into a belt change is easyer than an oil change rolleyes warnings of a destroyed engine works better than warnings of a worn engine in a few years (when somone else will cop the hit as they've sold it on by then).
I do work in a backstreet garage frequented in the main by numptys, tightwads and people who honestly think it's my fault their car needs 3 new tyres for the MOT cos they are bald as monks tonsure (and most of them drive thier children in them daily) so my veiw is tainted somewhat laugh

BigBo

212 posts

122 months

Saturday 20th December 2014
quotequote all
S0 What said:
The standard factory fibre ones, i tried the steel ones in an Essex but they whined more than the wife laugh
Belts are the best way to deal with infrquent oil changes IMHO as it has no impact on them unlike gears or chains, one less thing to be affected by an owners tightfistesdness, the downside is that same tightfistesdness can destroy an engine if a belt snaps but i find people are more inclined to take a hit in the wallet every few years for a belt shange rather than every year for a service! i see a lot of cam belt changes that really REALLY need an oil change but talking a customer into a belt change is easyer than an oil change rolleyes warnings of a destroyed engine works better than warnings of a worn engine in a few years (when somone else will cop the hit as they've sold it on by then).
I do work in a backstreet garage frequented in the main by numptys, tightwads and people who honestly think it's my fault their car needs 3 new tyres for the MOT cos they are bald as monks tonsure (and most of them drive thier children in them daily) so my veiw is tainted somewhat laugh
Isn't there afew different types of Fibre gears, then there is crap nylon ones and silly loud steel ones, have been researching this as I'm nearly done with the body of a 3.0s and timing gear is one of the last pieces for the engine build needed, steel seams best but some are v loud,

as for cars needing oil and tyres the customers always right eh?, we put a engine supplied by the owner in a b16 civic, told owner it needed a clutch and would be as well to change the belt for peace of mind, insisted he new the car it came from and as it ran well it'd be grand till the next payday, 2days later its stuck at the side of the road getting no-spark as the belt snapped, I don't think there is a completly flawless way of timing just well designed arrangements, its usually tensioners or guides that cause problems

also watching the recent Jay leno vid on the s600 they refer to the DFV as a benchmark for tappy engine because of the chain

Edited by BigBo on Saturday 20th December 00:23

garagewidow

1,502 posts

170 months

Saturday 20th December 2014
quotequote all
BigBo said:
Quiet and can do the same job, Gear driven would be noisy, a Essex V6 with steel timing gear tends to sound supercharged, A lot of older especially German cars had chains with no issues apart from getting rattily when needing adjustment, would of always preferred chain but there's a lot of modern chin driven engines that seem to give trouble BMW/mini ect

Gear driven Looks pretty tho


Edited by BigBo on Thursday 18th December 20:38


Edited by BigBo on Thursday 18th December 20:40
that's a jewel it should be in a carriage clock case.

I wonder how much parasitic loss it has compared to a belt drive though.

BigBo

212 posts

122 months

Saturday 20th December 2014
quotequote all
garagewidow said:
that's a jewel it should be in a carriage clock case.

I wonder how much parasitic loss it has compared to a belt drive though.
good question? that's a SR20, I believe they done it as its the best way they found to keep the timing accurate above 10.000rpm and its more accurate/precise also like engine-porn

konark

1,103 posts

119 months

Sunday 28th December 2014
quotequote all
Nothing wrong with using a rubber belt, what's the worst that can happen if it snaps.....unless you use it on an interference engine, but that would be crazy....wouldn't it? Oh, hang on....!

DukeDickson

4,721 posts

213 months

Sunday 28th December 2014
quotequote all
If you can get into six figures out of a belt without drama, is it really that much of an issue?
Std interval on a Mk2 Focus ST is 125k, so quarter of a mil on one belt change seems OK to me (even if some things could be better).

stevieturbo

17,258 posts

247 months

Sunday 28th December 2014
quotequote all
konark said:
Nothing wrong with using a rubber belt, what's the worst that can happen if it snaps.....unless you use it on an interference engine, but that would be crazy....wouldn't it? Oh, hang on....!
That's 1/8th of a mil lol

Dont think I'd trust a service interval of 125k, but even 60-80k for most is no big deal.

Unless it's a total nightmare to change.