Trying to trace david of pumaracing

Trying to trace david of pumaracing

Author
Discussion

Mojocvh

Original Poster:

16,837 posts

262 months

Saturday 29th August 2015
quotequote all
Title says it all, hope he's still about.

MoJocvh [now there's a hint]....

stevieturbo

17,258 posts

247 months

Saturday 29th August 2015
quotequote all
Mojocvh said:
Title says it all, hope he's still about.

MoJocvh [now there's a hint]....
If you post a really silly engine related question, he usually jumps right on it LOL.

But he is fairly regular here.

anonymous-user

54 months

Saturday 29th August 2015
quotequote all
Since he escaped to the Los Angeles Someplacegrimupnorth Underground, he's been acting as a solder of fortune. If you need help and no one else can help, then maybe, just maybe you can hire the A B team.......


Alternatively, start a thread with a title like "I replaced my engine oil with chicken soup, will it be ok to drive?" and i'm sure Pumy will be along immediately with some scathing criticism.... ;-)




Pumaracing

2,089 posts

207 months

Sunday 30th August 2015
quotequote all
I'm sure I can leave any chicken soup type questions to my protégés on here. Some of them are coming along quite nicely now smile

Anyhoo, what can I help with?

Pumaracing

2,089 posts

207 months

Sunday 30th August 2015
quotequote all
Max_Torque said:
... he's been acting as a solder of fortune.
Lead free solder?

TheEnd

15,370 posts

188 months

Sunday 30th August 2015
quotequote all
Maybe you can hire the ROHS team.

anonymous-user

54 months

Sunday 30th August 2015
quotequote all
I love it when a Thread comes together........ Derr De Derr, De De Derr..........

AER

1,142 posts

270 months

Monday 31st August 2015
quotequote all
Pumaracing said:
Max_Torque said:
... he's been acting as a solder of fortune.
Lead free solder?
Tin solders, of course!

Mojocvh

Original Poster:

16,837 posts

262 months

Monday 31st August 2015
quotequote all
Pumaracing said:
I'm sure I can leave any chicken soup type questions to my protégés on here. Some of them are coming along quite nicely now smile

Anyhoo, what can I help with?
..nothing too exciting, CVH questions, pity your site is down as that was a good read..

OK car has been laid up, I'm wanting to ensure good start up lubrication from the off, what would you recommend for the cam lobes themselves to ensure they stay in the shape that was intended prior to oil getting up there?

Do you [or anyone] know if there are any haynes manuals still going for these engines, mine came from a cvh 1598 wink carb XR2 C reg...

On the performance front, I don't think there's much more to be done, the head [the "proper semi hemi type] has been quite heavily worked, valve guides, ported etc, oh and it has also been skimmed itruns a kent cvh22 cam, moderately high lift, with about 4 deg of overlap, [cam timing is really important here it should still be set up right but who knows what the grease monkies have been up to, the vernier shouldn't have been touched since it was set up] I just want to get it running and check oil pressure, flow, get it warmed up properly and see where we are etc, etc..

cheers

Mo.



Pumaracing

2,089 posts

207 months

Monday 31st August 2015
quotequote all
My site is all archived here.

https://web.archive.org/web/20110902010921/http://...

If the cam is already run in and the car has just been off the road for a while then the oil will find its own way up there pretty damn quick.

Turn7

23,594 posts

221 months

Monday 31st August 2015
quotequote all
Could you not spin it over with the plugs out to get the oil up top ?

My old racebike I used to have the ignition wired so I could sping the motor to prelub the top before hitting the Ign on.

Mojocvh

Original Poster:

16,837 posts

262 months

Thursday 3rd September 2015
quotequote all
Thanks David.

Turn 7, yes thats what I intend to do thanks guys.

PS it's a cvhk 23 cam that fitted pretty wild for a hyd lifter-> 2.5k to 6.8k....290 duration..


Ref:
http://www.kentcams.com/product-details/112/Camsha...

Edited by Mojocvh on Thursday 3rd September 12:42

Pumaracing

2,089 posts

207 months

Thursday 3rd September 2015
quotequote all
The CVH23 is clearly very new. I've never heard of it and it's not even in their 2012 catalogue. The online data is also deeply suspicious. Inlet timing of 30/65 degrees indicates 275 degree duration not 290 so who knows what it really is. It has less lift than the CVH33 which is a genuine 290 degree cam so presumably it has less duration too. Best guess is it's somewhere between the CVH22 (genuine 7% power increase) and the CVH33 (genuine 11 or 12% increase). The Kent power claims for their cams have always been quite outrageous and the catalogues full of errors.

Of course those of us who practice the "real world hands on tuning" don't tend to rely on cam catalogues for accurate data. It tends to leave one with egg on ones face.

Andy 308GTB

2,923 posts

221 months

Thursday 3rd September 2015
quotequote all
Pumaracing said:
That site is a bit of a goldmine!
The TOOL USE TECHNIQUES section which covers the freeing up stuck fasteners should be made a sticky in the Technical section.

Rally Ax

43 posts

201 months

Thursday 3rd September 2015
quotequote all
The cvh23 has been out for a long time but it never really worked as well as the cvh22. The cvh33 was quite a good cam to that really suited twin webers. My all time favourite cam in the cvh was the 22, really nice all round cam with nice road manners. A friend had one of your heads Dave, it was the semi big valve one, I'm sure it had a cvh33 and a dgav on it,,, flying machine around Knockhill!

Pumaracing

2,089 posts

207 months

Friday 4th September 2015
quotequote all
If I could obtain good enough blanks to regrind on I always used to use my own profiles in CVHs so maybe it's not that surprising I didn't come across the Kent 23 if it wasn't even in their catalogue. Maurice who used to grind them for me is long since retired though. The 001 profile did everything road based and drove like a stock cam but with 7 or 8 more bhp at the top end and the 002 profile was for twin carbs, track use and full monty road engines. I guess the CVH22 and 33 were the closest comparisons and you didn't really need much more than two choices for the CVH.

Rally Ax

43 posts

201 months

Friday 4th September 2015
quotequote all
I remember that Fast Car did a feature with DV, he did some sort of back to back with the cvh22. I can't remember if it was the same feature or another where they compared the cvh22 and cvh23, from memory the 23 never bettered the 22 across the whole power band.

Pumaracing

2,089 posts

207 months

Friday 4th September 2015
quotequote all
DV did a feature on the CVH engine? That isn't an engine I ever associated with him. I'll have to ask him if he remembers next time we speak.

PeterBurgess

775 posts

146 months

Wednesday 9th September 2015
quotequote all
Rally Ax...almost right but a letter out, it was DM (Danny Morris) who did the article on CVH cams not DV. We dug out a copy of the mag, November 1992!

Peter




Pumaracing

2,089 posts

207 months

Wednesday 9th September 2015
quotequote all
I actually remember that test now. I may even have the magazine lurking somewhere. It was an appallingly conducted affair. The stock springs and lifters easily rev to 6500 which is where the std cam would be dropping off big time but the performance ones would be going strong and showing the largest gains but they never bothered revving it that high. Even the RS1600i cam on solid lifters was bottled at 6000.

However the big trick they missed was just to drop the 1600i solid lifter cam in on the stock hydraulic lifters which is what I did on many engines. The 1600i has more lift than the Piper 270 or 285 or the Kent CVH22 and the same duration as the hottest of those. It therefore beat all of them for power so I have no idea why it supposedly fared so badly in this test.