RE: 4 Stroke Redesigned

RE: 4 Stroke Redesigned

Author
Discussion

Feliks

739 posts

229 months

Sunday 30th May 2010
quotequote all
I present my visions to resolve this difficult problem of stopping the oil slick:

You must first prepare a specially made item to seal the leak. It must have a large size that is 60 feet tall and 60 feet in diameter at its widest point. at the bottom of this item, please place a special knife around the bottom edge. Knife must of course be made of very hard material, such that will be able to cut all the metal parts that will be on its way

In his way will certainly be a lot of old items damaged hole.
Of course, that this knife can cut through all the elements needed to operate a very large force.
And here once it wisely:
So, yes, prepared some of the new valves (of course, completely open for the moment) should leave the head in the fire, so was in the middle of that item, the item with the valves can say, weighing about 100 tons. This does not allow the weight placed on its bottom remains the old structure with a knife.
But this element has a conical tank shown in the figure, which is thrown from the vessel through a pipe can fill it with concrete or specific, or a ball of iron. Its dimensions are 60 feet in diameter and 30 height. The size of this "cone" will be about 3,000 cubic meters (m ^ 3).
If you will fill it, for example, iron is its weight increased to approximately 21,000 tonnes. feel that this burden is not cheap, it was a knife to cut all the metal parts that are on the road. Ellement pockets certainly say that the bottom about 20 feet. It will seal.
The next step will be to close the new valve at the top of the item. Later, these valves will work even with the new pipe attached.
I think that despite the high oil pressure is also created so much of the burden will be able to seal the damaged head.






I totally do not know to whom to send my solution. So please read his message, where there is a chance that will go into the right hands.
Maybe it will help you seal the leak.

Regards Andrew Feliks coffee

This is the first underwater press cutting iron rolleyes

Feliks

739 posts

229 months

Monday 31st May 2010
quotequote all
Further refinement:
Through small holes in the bottom of the cone, the possible leakage logic accumulate in the reservoir at the bottom, where an additional procedure of evacuated tube to the platform.




Regards Andrewcoffeecoffee

Feliks

739 posts

229 months

Tuesday 1st June 2010
quotequote all
And that little bit more help with entering into the seabed:
Dawson Double Acting Hydraulic Impact Hammers



Regards Andrew smashsmash

Feliks

739 posts

229 months

Sunday 6th June 2010
quotequote all
annodomini2 said:
Ok many Thanks annodomini2.
Already found this link and sent them.

Polisch text with more detail: http://www.new4stroke.com/Polskitext.htm

Regards Andrew

Edited by Feliks on Sunday 6th June 23:46

Feliks

739 posts

229 months

Thursday 15th July 2010
quotequote all
Drive for pump or oscillating dynamo:



Will it be possible the new World Energy Policy in line
with this map ??

[URL="http://www.new4stroke.com/Heightwave.PDF"]http://www.new4stroke.com/Heightwave.PDF[/URL]

Regards Andrew wavey

Race Tech

19 posts

165 months

Wednesday 21st July 2010
quotequote all
I've come in a bit late to this discussion (5 years or so...) but why exactly do you want to get rid of the valvetrain in the original 4-stroke concept?

Surely a piston/crankshaft porting assembly will have more inertia and require more energy to drive than a conventional cam system. Likewise, although you do get valvetrain failures occasionally I'm not aware of it being enough of a weak point to require a redesign.

Feliks

739 posts

229 months

Friday 23rd July 2010
quotequote all
Race Tech said:
I've come in a bit late to this discussion (5 years or so...) but why exactly do you want to get rid of the valvetrain in the original 4-stroke concept?

Surely a piston/crankshaft porting assembly will have more inertia and require more energy to drive than a conventional cam system. Likewise, although you do get valvetrain failures occasionally I'm not aware of it being enough of a weak point to require a redesign.
At least 32 years of the late smile

Started with the first prototype in 1978 years, doing it on my thesis at the Technical University (my own money)
Because such a long period of time sometimes I know that design very much, and I have jurisdiction to its distance.

Knowing full well what makes the current timing problems, I need to inventing something, more simple and reliable.

The pictures and drawings on my page, well you can see that the first prototype, it is only another slide timing.
The second prototype, already, the new 4-stroke engine three-piston.

I worked on it three years, and I wanted to get the power of 100 hp, with such a structure designed.

But at the end, he was surprised, because this engine is how it turned out to have two and a half times more at 10 000 rpm.

Why, I, the designer of this engine, so I was very surprised (in a good way)??

Already have a precise answer, but to accurately explain to all, in order to then be able to construct prototypes of the best, you need to teach about half of the academic year.
There are so many different brand new and surprising relationships and advantages of this completely new design. Even as an experienced engineer in auto racing, I could not predict them. Surely someone else how to meet this design, it also will initially commit the same mistakes as I am, in assessing certain parameters and depending.
Example with this forces of inertia. They are smaller, because the turnover is two times smaller and four times less power.
And so now, I wanted only to do good timing, as it turned out that unintentionally improved physical efficiency four stroke engine.
In this problem help me Swiss phisic Mr Daniel Hubner , whose elegat describe it:


On this thread are my up almost all publications, courtesy Piston Heads.
but it still presents a few links, which may be something more.
http://www.f1technical.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=4...

Title "Mind" http://www.8thcivic.com/forums/garage/172500-mind....
http://www.smokstak.com/forum/showthread.php?t=592...
This construction requires only dissemination, so that it could have been slow to learn its strengths. And probably worth it, because the term can be realistically achieved with a power of 420 HP one liters of a traditional capacity at 10 000 revolutions, and can it be a diesel

Regards Andrew coffeecoffee

To relieve stress connected with the "Mind", a little live music with my friends amateur musicians of 1979
http://www.new4stroke.com/D1979.mp3music










Edited by Feliks on Friday 23 July 09:25

Feliks

739 posts

229 months

Tuesday 3rd August 2010
quotequote all
Well, who would have thought that Newcomen was so close to an adequate solution rolleyes






Regards Andrew coffeecoffee

Edited by Feliks on Tuesday 3rd August 12:43

Feliks

739 posts

229 months

Thursday 5th August 2010
quotequote all
Beautiful simple new 4 stroke kinematics animation made at the
King Soud University.





And a little faster



Regards Andrew coffeecoffee

Feliks

739 posts

229 months

Tuesday 10th August 2010
quotequote all
Feliks said:
Well, who would have thought that Newcomen was so close to an adequate solution rolleyes
I also very close to the Technology


Regards Andrew coffeecoffee

Feliks

739 posts

229 months

Thursday 12th August 2010
quotequote all
I think that this technology is very effective. Can you imagine that by doing the same movement up and down through the traditional piston-connecting rod-crankshaft to get the same ease the movement of this vehicle?
I think that it would then be much harder work. And these four , the looks on it, they not liked to work more than need.... rolleyes

Regards Andrew coffeecoffee

Edited by Feliks on Thursday 12th August 00:32

Feliks

739 posts

229 months

Saturday 14th August 2010
quotequote all
However and that will had such a good humor, just take a timber and a little grease lubricated.rolleyes

Do not need any oil !! biggrinbiggrin

Seal or Teflon or lubricated with diesel fuel.

OIl = diesel fuel in this picture





Regards Andrewcoffeecoffee

Feliks

739 posts

229 months

Thursday 19th August 2010
quotequote all
Some new4stroke history:

Print table of Fortran 1982 program.
I could choose from 100 of these tables, each for different angular positions of crakshafts.
Here is one of them:


Working drawing of the head:



Regards Andrew coffeecoffee

slartibartfast

4,014 posts

201 months

Thursday 19th August 2010
quotequote all
chuntington101 said:

PS. i have seen some HUGE opposing piston engines at the train musseum in York. they had mounted in a triangle formation from what i remember. it was a monter!
That's the Deltic engine used first in marine mine sweepers and Deltic loco's for british rail, awsome engine, awsome sound

Felks

13 posts

167 months

Tuesday 24th August 2010
quotequote all
Feliks said:
At least 32 years of the late smile

This construction requires only dissemination, so that it could have been slow to learn its strengths. And probably worth it, because the term can be realistically achieved with a power of 420 HP one liters of a traditional capacity at 10 000 revolutions, and can it be a diesel
However if you compare the structure of the F1 motor gasoline, which rotates 18,000 rpm, this would be my 3 x 1000 = 3000 ccm ccm traditionaly capacity.

At 18,000 rpm would be my engine 1 liter ~ ~ 800 HP
 3 x 800 HP = 2400 HP .....

Probably should seriously consider the provisions of F1.
1 liter capacity was enough ......

Regards Andrew coffeecoffee

1 liter ,6 cylinder = 150 ccm any (right now 300 ccm)
max rpm , I think 25000 rpm.... ~~ 1000 HP idea

I do not know why my person name changed to Felks ??

Regards Andrew Feliks

Edited by Felks on Tuesday 24th August 02:36


Edited by Felks on Sunday 26th September 15:25

Felks

13 posts

167 months

Wednesday 8th September 2010
quotequote all
The first windmills pumped water in America. To sustain this good tradition, I developed a little more modern sytem for the production of electric current in a similar way of pumping water.Whether American landscape views, are water sphere.I decided to add this view to the next shot where the water will be collected water so that it could give electrical energy when draining it back into the lower reservoir.




This water will be pumped sphery as in the first versions of windmills, wind.
The wind turbine will move a small diameter, but it is a multi-blade, placed together with the hydraulic pump in the middle of a specially constructed balloon. Balloon will be tethered, as previously barrage balloons.
Only that will go along the line, hydraulic pipes, the hydraulic motor, which will be driven water pump located in the lower reservoir.The water pump will continuously pump water to sphery. Now the water falling from the lower reservoir back to the shery, will do an electric current through hydrogenerator.






Every so water sphere about the capacity of 2000 m 3, and the height 100 m can give power 10 MW for 3 minutes. If filling pumps water with the one I believe loss is managing to fill waters up, we will have it 10 MW driven with wind turbine in balloons.
Of course, the balloons could be filled up by hydrogen, because today we have very good material on the shell.
This system could be installed in any place where electricity is needed, and thus would have limited losses on the transfer.
Also low noise, and the invisibility of the rotating blades, not to interfere in coexistence with the environment.Balloons can be affixed to a height of 150 to 200 meters, where the wind is always blowing on the ground even when there is absolute silence.

some links:
http://media.primezone.com/cache/189/int/8385.jpg

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mu2glpmRXIs&fea...

http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/21/northrop-grumma...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W3n5cUaG5fg&fea...

Regards Andrew coffeecoffee

On Saturday is the anniversary of 9 / 11, and make this possible, I decided to share with my good deed ,publication of this study.

http://www.911dayofservice.org/

Edited by Felks on Wednesday 8th September 11:50

annodomini2

6,861 posts

251 months

Wednesday 8th September 2010
quotequote all
Felks said:
The first windmills pumped water in America. To sustain this good tradition, I developed a little more modern sytem for the production of electric current in a similar way of pumping water.Whether American landscape views, are water sphere.I decided to add this view to the next shot where the water will be collected water so that it could give electrical energy when draining it back into the lower reservoir.




This water will be pumped sphery as in the first versions of windmills, wind.
The wind turbine will move a small diameter, but it is a multi-blade, placed together with the hydraulic pump in the middle of a specially constructed balloon. Balloon will be tethered, as previously barrage balloons.
Only that will go along the line, hydraulic pipes, the hydraulic motor, which will be driven water pump located in the lower reservoir.The water pump will continuously pump water to sphery. Now the water falling from the lower reservoir back to the shery, will do an electric current through hydrogenerator.






Every so water sphere about the capacity of 2000 m 3, and the height 100 m can give power 10 MW for 3 minutes. If filling pumps water with the one I believe loss is managing to fill waters up, we will have it 10 MW driven with wind turbine in balloons.
Of course, the balloons could be filled up by hydrogen, because today we have very good material on the shell.
This system could be installed in any place where electricity is needed, and thus would have limited losses on the transfer.
Also low noise, and the invisibility of the rotating blades, not to interfere in coexistence with the environment.Balloons can be affixed to a height of 150 to 200 meters, where the wind is always blowing on the ground even when there is absolute silence.

some links:
http://media.primezone.com/cache/189/int/8385.jpg

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mu2glpmRXIs&fea...

http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/21/northrop-grumma...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W3n5cUaG5fg&fea...

Regards Andrew coffeecoffee

On Saturday is the anniversary of 9 / 11, and make this possible, I decided to share with my good deed ,publication of this study.

http://www.911dayofservice.org/

Edited by Felks on Wednesday 8th September 11:50
Two major issues with that:

1. You'd need 2 turbines to counteract the torque from the pump, otherwise it'll behave like a helicopter with no tail rotor and spin round. This will also negate the benefit of the generation

2. Water is heavy, when you are attempting to lift something in this manner weight is critical, the size of the generator is determined by the size of the balloon an electric setup in these circumstances would be much lighter.

Logistically it would be an nightmare, health and safety would have a field day with it.

Felks

13 posts

167 months

Friday 10th September 2010
quotequote all
annodomini2 said:
Two major issues with that:

1. You'd need 2 turbines to counteract the torque from the pump, otherwise it'll behave like a helicopter with no tail rotor and spin round. This will also negate the benefit of the generation

2. Water is heavy, when you are attempting to lift something in this manner weight is critical, the size of the generator is determined by the size of the balloon an electric setup in these circumstances would be much lighter.

Logistically it would be an nightmare, health and safety would have a field day with it.
Welcome annodomini2.
Very good with you give your critical comments. This helps to develop my ideas just like this.

Ad 1 :


Of course, two rotate in one direction and two in the opposite direction.

Ad 2. Water is heavy - need using
You must use a very light hydraulic oil. If it were not frozen in winter.
Hydraulic pump in the balloon has the best power to weight ratio. All the airlines are working on the hydraulic actuators.

My be used my dynastarter invention , to this balloon ,
only in dynamo wersion . I'ts too not heavy.

And nightmare because of the danger, will only whales. because these balloons can be placed on the sea.
Of course, all of the balloon must be tested in the wind tunnel aerodynamic, in order to fully match the efficiency of the 21st century

Regards Andrewcoffeecoffee




Edited by Felks on Saturday 11th September 22:57

annodomini2

6,861 posts

251 months

Friday 10th September 2010
quotequote all
1. An individual hydraulic pump does have a better power to weight ratio than an electric generator, however when you add 400m -600m(in and out) of hoses plus the oil in the hoses, it wouldn't be.

In theory you could run higher pressure, however above 300-350bar the weight of the hoses and components outweighs the loss in oil weight.

Older aeroplane designs use servo hydraulics, but the majority of new designs are ditching the hydraulics in favor of electric actuators, due weight, cost and simplicity of installation.

2. Yes you can put them at sea, but;

1. They are also floating device, how would they be secured such that they stay where they are?

2. If this breaks free, what's to stop it floating over a populated area and crashing?

3. There are boats aswell as whales in the sea!

I get the idea of having a storage facility, but this would probably have to be on land, there are currently many countries which operate reservoir based hydroelectric systems, that can reverse their generators to store energy during off peak hours and supply energy very quickly during peak hours.

Generating electricity directly and then using these land based systems, may allow for more remote installations.