2020 Peugeot 208, 1.2 Petrol Misfire & Limp Mode

2020 Peugeot 208, 1.2 Petrol Misfire & Limp Mode

Author
Discussion

Patrick Bateman

Original Poster:

12,192 posts

175 months

Monday 5th February
quotequote all
Hoping someone can help here, this happened last July as a one off with no repairs done and has never re-appeared until now...

The other half's 208 broke down on the way to work this morning, I wasn't there and the RAC are still to appear but the symptoms were all the same- a big misfire, lots of juddering, engine warning on, limp mode. When she pulled over there was a fan of some sort screaming its head off for a while.

She tried restarting again after the fan had gone off as the last time this happened the problem had disappeared all on its own after waiting 1.5 hours for a recovery truck to appear. redface Unfortunately this time it clearly wasn't long enough as it started again and apparently 'steam' was coming out the bonnet so she turned it off again straight away.

Previously, the breakdown guy's code reader showed a misfire on cylinder 3 (P1339) but as I said, other than clearing the codes nothing was ever done and it's been fine ever since as a daily driver. I'm expecting to see the same code today.

Coming by any concrete information seems tricky online, I suppose it's not really a brand that has 'in-the-know' owners on forums.

Would anyone know of likely places to look? Camshaft sensor?

E-bmw

9,240 posts

153 months

Monday 5th February
quotequote all
Is that the hateful engine with a wet cam-belt?

Patrick Bateman

Original Poster:

12,192 posts

175 months

Monday 5th February
quotequote all
It is indeed a wet cambelt.

The guy last year mentioned the belts on them being a weak point but it was in good visual condition at the time and I had a look relatively recently and it still looked fine to me.

Patrick Bateman

Original Poster:

12,192 posts

175 months

Monday 5th February
quotequote all
Trying to get this home now, RAC are a fking shambles.

Seems a hitting a large pothole was the trigger which is very odd or one hell of a coincidence.

E-bmw

9,240 posts

153 months

Tuesday 6th February
quotequote all
Patrick Bateman said:
It is indeed a wet cambelt.

The guy last year mentioned the belts on them being a weak point but it was in good visual condition at the time and I had a look relatively recently and it still looked fine to me.
Going forward if you intend to keep the car do oil & filter changes at least every year/6000 miles and ONLY use manufacturers specified oil, on top of that change the belt at half the recommended interval and when this is done get the sump dropped & cleaned out for debris.

Unless you do all of this or are extremely lucky, expect a belt failure to junk the engine.

Patrick Bateman

Original Poster:

12,192 posts

175 months

Tuesday 6th February
quotequote all
That bad??

E-bmw

9,240 posts

153 months

Tuesday 6th February
quotequote all
Yes.

Patrick Bateman

Original Poster:

12,192 posts

175 months

Tuesday 6th February
quotequote all
Have you owned/worked on any of them?

TwinKam

2,993 posts

96 months

Tuesday 6th February
quotequote all
Applies to Ford's wet-belt engines also.
Jury is still out on Honda's version...

Patrick Bateman

Original Poster:

12,192 posts

175 months

Tuesday 6th February
quotequote all
Is this to do with the fact the belt is in the oil across a few manufacturers?

Patrick Bateman

Original Poster:

12,192 posts

175 months

Thursday 8th February
quotequote all
Booked into our nearest dealer over an hour away on 18th March. redface

Patrick Bateman

Original Poster:

12,192 posts

175 months

Monday 25th March
quotequote all
Of all things, only appears to be a fked spark plug after all this time of not driving it.