What Engine for 500BHP

What Engine for 500BHP

Author
Discussion

anonymous-user

54 months

Thursday 29th May 2014
quotequote all
Pumaracing said:
turbonutter said:
I can see that being true for a 4pot or some v engines, but does it hold true for the alfa V6 with its offset journal crank?
Yes. Stop f**king about and don't argue with an engine building dog.
Indeed!



He's just checking the cam timing in that pic........ ;-)

Pumaracing

2,089 posts

207 months

Monday 2nd June 2014
quotequote all
Max_Torque said:
Looking at the head, the water way break through is very likely to give a poor clamp load, and hardly any "back up" capability. I'd say, looking at the those pics there is no sign of excessive det, and the gasket failure is simply a peak pressure overload one. (Pmax, not PKmax)


I think you're going to have to approach one of the custom gasket firms and get something specific designed to suit that situation. You may also wish to consider getting the heads welded to remove the "weak" spot too.......
Smirk smile

turbonutter

Original Poster:

496 posts

208 months

Wednesday 9th July 2014
quotequote all
Not Much Process with the engine build as I have been busy with other things.

I did get the pistons Matched to the old ones weight wise - It might not be necessary, but its not going to hurt,

Also got the liners back with the O-rings installed. SO I have more ore less everything now for the rebuild.

Also the Exhaust has some new Bosses Welded on for the Dual Lambda, Extra EGT sensors & Exhaust Pressure Take Off.

The New Gear Lever I havebeen Making is finally completed & works really well.







Also Have a new throttle pedal and Pot from a Vauxhall for the Drive by Wire Function..




ivanhoew

976 posts

241 months

Thursday 10th July 2014
quotequote all
nice bits!

turbonutter

Original Poster:

496 posts

208 months

Wednesday 23rd July 2014
quotequote all
Ok Finally finished playing with the car changes & had time to build the engine...

Heads skimmed (10 tho taken off)
New Pistons 8.4:1 - Weight matched to last set of pistons.
Liners with stainless o-ring in top face.
New Coils from Audi R8(among others) with my adaptors.

Full strip and rebuild - checked the bearings an no signs of any impending failiure there, so that is one thing that wont be a problem.

|http://thumbsnap.com/xSz2tU9n[/url]









Thats all for a while as its back to work for me untill october, then its dyno time for the engine.....

Liquid Knight

15,754 posts

183 months

Thursday 24th July 2014
quotequote all
I've gone a bought myself a metal one. wink

http://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?h=0&a...

Nowhere near as ambitious as your Stratos but...

turbonutter

Original Poster:

496 posts

208 months

Thursday 24th July 2014
quotequote all
Looks like a fun Project smile

and with a lot of shared parts with the stratos (well a few) Steering column door Handles to name a couple...

Liquid Knight

15,754 posts

183 months

Thursday 24th July 2014
quotequote all
turbonutter said:
Looks like a fun Project smile

and with a lot of shared parts with the stratos (well a few) Steering column door Handles to name a couple...
Ferrari 328 headlights etc...

My Punto Sporting has a genII 1598cc 128 engine and there have been a few genIII 16V 128 transplants over the years. While Punto HGT's are dirt cheap it makes sense to drop fifty or so extra bhp in there. wink

There's a wide arch shell tucked away in deepest darkest Essex that's tempting me to flog the Punto and MX5 so I can use my red X1/9 and have a project. wink

turbonutter

Original Poster:

496 posts

208 months

Thursday 24th July 2014
quotequote all
Liquid Knight said:
There's a wide arch shell tucked away in deepest darkest Essex that's tempting me to flog the Punto and MX5 so I can use my red X1/9 and have a project. wink
Go on you know you want to biggrin

Liquid Knight

15,754 posts

183 months

Tuesday 29th July 2014
quotequote all
http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Lancia-Stratos/281397328...

They won't take my X1/9 as a part exchange. rolleyes

Edited by Liquid Knight on Tuesday 29th July 16:16

turbonutter

Original Poster:

496 posts

208 months

Friday 31st October 2014
quotequote all
So Back home again & starting to get the car put back together readu for mapping - Engine is in and first job was to fill up the fuel system & check for leaks - easier to fix any issues now, before I add the rest of the parts...
Fuel system ran up to 3bar & no leaks, so all good - until I checked the fuel level in the tank - the new fuel resistant flexible filler hose wasnt resistant to Shell V-power.. Picture is after leaving the tank full overnight.



This was the thin wall (2mm) very flexible type - soon to be replaced with the thicker walled less flexible type. I have a sample of the thicker hose in V-power and so far so good.

I filled the tank to capacity & including the swirl pot it holds 60L wich is a good improvement over the 44L the last tank held, so well worth the effort.

SHould have the engine wiring loom next week, so nearly ready for mapping smile

Liquid Knight

15,754 posts

183 months

Friday 31st October 2014
quotequote all
Welcome back. wavey

That V-Power stuff is crap. £20 worth basically killed my Punto and I had to bin the lines, filer and injectors to get the old bus running well enough to sell on. Luckily the pump and tank were okay as that was more than the car was worth to put right.


turbonutter

Original Poster:

496 posts

208 months

Friday 31st October 2014
quotequote all
Cheers smile

The V power has definately got something potent in it! I Had no problems running it before - all the other fuel hose i have is ptfe and the filler hose i had before was fine with it. Looked into the tank and the foam is still good, so at least that is resistant!

stevieturbo

17,259 posts

247 months

Saturday 1st November 2014
quotequote all
turbonutter said:
So Back home again & starting to get the car put back together readu for mapping - Engine is in and first job was to fill up the fuel system & check for leaks - easier to fix any issues now, before I add the rest of the parts...
Fuel system ran up to 3bar & no leaks, so all good - until I checked the fuel level in the tank - the new fuel resistant flexible filler hose wasnt resistant to Shell V-power.. Picture is after leaving the tank full overnight.



This was the thin wall (2mm) very flexible type - soon to be replaced with the thicker walled less flexible type. I have a sample of the thicker hose in V-power and so far so good.

I filled the tank to capacity & including the swirl pot it holds 60L wich is a good improvement over the 44L the last tank held, so well worth the effort.

SHould have the engine wiring loom next week, so nearly ready for mapping smile
A friend had the same problem with some hose from Viper.

They did put it down to a supplier issue, they replaced the hose FOC and it has been good ever since

andygtt

8,344 posts

264 months

Monday 10th November 2014
quotequote all
I had a similar issue with my fuel tank a few years back... I used a rubber between a seal at the top of my tank that was supposed to be fuel proof.... it wasn't until a year later I found it was a molten mess at the bottom of the tank.

Some rubber is only fuel 'resistant' rather than fuel 'proof'... its a bit of a mine field as IMO a lot is miss-sold... I put an off cut of new stuff in a glass of petrol and have left it in there for 2 years now so that I can see if it starts to break down lol

turbonutter

Original Poster:

496 posts

208 months

Thursday 13th November 2014
quotequote all
Had my new fuel hose in V-power for 2 weeks now - looks the same as when it went in, so should be ok for a while!

Collected my Engine Harness last week part of it is shown here







it is now fitted to the engine and the plug to the chassis wired in with the ECU supply's and relays.

A few sensors to connect, but that will be done later. Checked most inputs & all are working ok, SO nearly ready for the mapping. I am away for a week now, so it will have to wait...

Also have made an elbow to replace the turbo, so we can do the first map N/A without having to worry about the turbo..




stevieturbo

17,259 posts

247 months

Thursday 13th November 2014
quotequote all
Why the two boxes with the ecu ?

Not sure I'd agree with removing the turbo. Cant see that being of any real benefit for mapping, when the turbine and compressor being there, even off boost will make a huge difference to any mapping.

I'd have sooner ran the turbo with an open wastegate or something...but really I'd see no reason why not to map with the turbo in place.

Loom looks excellent quality.

turbonutter

Original Poster:

496 posts

208 months

Thursday 13th November 2014
quotequote all
The second Box is a 4 channel EGT Amp. The AEM ECU does not have it onboard.

Loom is really good quality - pictured is the rear bank, the front bank is similar, but with a few less connectors.

There are pro's and cons with removing the turbo, but with the AEM tuning being based on VE, a good VE map is a must, hence a first map without the turbo. As I understand if the VE map on the N/A engine is good, then the ECU can do most of the correction for boost on its own, with just minor trims. We will see when we get to that point

anonymous-user

54 months

Thursday 13th November 2014
quotequote all
Er, you aren't going to get a "good" VE map with the turbo missing, even in the "off boost" region!

eliot

11,418 posts

254 months

Thursday 13th November 2014
quotequote all
Aye - I would of thought the presence of the turbo would have an impact on the VE tables.

Although having said that, I run megasquirt which is MAP(ve) based and was originally tuned before I fitted the turbo - in the main, I just mapped out the higher areas over 100kpa, but in gradual steps - i.e. 2 psi, 4 psi, 6psi etc
I don't recall having to massively change the areas below 100kpa, perhaps just some fettling.