EGR Valve

Author
Discussion

supermono

Original Poster:

7,368 posts

249 months

Thursday 15th March 2007
quotequote all
Our family stinkwheel (1.9jtd doblo) is showing all the signs of a stuck EGR. After unsuccessfully getting the local fiat agent to fix it under warranty yesterday (another story!) I've decided to do the simple job myself.

I'm in two minds though. Should I buy another EGR valve (can't be arsed to clean the old one for 5 minutes more use) and then another one in a couple more years etc, etc, or just make up a little steel plate to fit between the flange on the connecting pipe and the inlet manifold to disable the function?

As far as I understand it, the EGR valve is entirely to do with emmissions so is of zero use and blocking it off has no ill effects. Am I right?

What to do?

SM

fwdracer

3,564 posts

225 months

Thursday 15th March 2007
quotequote all
EGR valves feeds the engine its own sh*t. Took the EGR off the O-series perkins diesel in our elderly Maestro yonks ago and it improved the engines response and helped fuel econmy too. Could still produce huge clouds of Black sh*t on demand when clogging it (those O-series could smoke some!) - great for upsetting tailgaters hehe

That was on a mechanical pump diesel and so had no impact on fuelling.

If your Diesel is common rail with management of fuelling (and probably a closed loop input from downstream in the exhaust (giving input into the EGR in the exhaust) it may cause problems. See if you have an electric EGR valve - should be simple to check for wiring loom too/from.

busa_rush

6,930 posts

252 months

Thursday 15th March 2007
quotequote all
My engine is a modern common rail diesel and the first thing I did was to remove the egr valve to clean it out then blocked off the vacuum pipe that opens it. Made a useful difference to both economy and performance. Just make sure it closes properly before you refit it.

supermono

Original Poster:

7,368 posts

249 months

Thursday 15th March 2007
quotequote all
I was thinking about blocking off the actual pipe between the manifolds by making a plate to fit between the flange/manifold one end or the other so it makes no difference if the EGR valve is open or closed...

What do you think?

SM

fwdracer

3,564 posts

225 months

Thursday 15th March 2007
quotequote all
On the scabby Maestro TD we took the valve out completely. 2 x blanking plates in made up in 4mm plate + 2 new gaskets. Job done.

If your EGR is Vacumm operated (per the MAestro) you'll have no bother. Just check it isn't an Electric EGR that has part open conditions at certain throttle/load conditions on your modern common rail unit.

ridds

8,228 posts

245 months

Friday 16th March 2007
quotequote all
Blank it off.

Illegal as you are interferring with the cars emission compliance system but it will be better without it.

That Daddy

18,962 posts

222 months

Friday 16th March 2007
quotequote all
Be careful blanking this off can trip a fault code error on some systems(dont know if your model is affected)the transit pushrod 2.5 diesels love it blanked,so do the earlier peugeot & citroen XUD engined models,if you can cap it off just do it,smoother running and cleaner intake manifold & unchoked inlet ports are just two of the benefits.EGRsmash

GavinPearson

5,715 posts

252 months

Saturday 17th March 2007
quotequote all
supermono said:
Our family stinkwheel (1.9jtd doblo) is showing all the signs of a stuck EGR. After unsuccessfully getting the local fiat agent to fix it under warranty yesterday (another story!) I've decided to do the simple job myself.

I'm in two minds though. Should I buy another EGR valve (can't be arsed to clean the old one for 5 minutes more use) and then another one in a couple more years etc, etc, or just make up a little steel plate to fit between the flange on the connecting pipe and the inlet manifold to disable the function?

As far as I understand it, the EGR valve is entirely to do with emmissions so is of zero use and blocking it off has no ill effects. Am I right?

What to do?

SM


Simple answer is to tell the dealer to put some effort into fixing the problem.

If the engine has a diagnostic function the use of a blanking plate could be detected and limit the engine performance. EGR should also improve part load fuel economy plus give emissions benefits, so it's probably best to have it working correctly.

victormeldrew

8,293 posts

278 months

Saturday 17th March 2007
quotequote all
If its on an Audi A2 nuke the fecker from orbit - they make a god awful racket.

That Daddy

18,962 posts

222 months

Saturday 17th March 2007
quotequote all
On diesels i can not see EGR improving power,they only improve emmissions at high engine speeds,ie motorway speeds,round town big no no,just contaminates the fresh inlet charge with crap.Just another manafacturers were doing how bit for emmissions gadget,they do have benefits but not in the world these cars live in,Audi/vw engines suffer bad inlet contamination because of the EGR system,to the point where the inlet manifold runners reduce to nothing,how can that improve running and emmissionseek

stylusboy

9 posts

235 months

Saturday 17th March 2007
quotequote all
This is a common rail Diesel and the engine management system expects the EGR to be there and working. There is no feedback to the engine management system with regard to the position of the EGR valve. Blanking off the EGR valve will help confirm if it is faulty but I would be wary of leaving it in this state for too long, personally.

When checking the EGR make sure that the valve spindle AND the solenoid spindle move freely. You will need to detach the solenoid to do this.

supermono

Original Poster:

7,368 posts

249 months

Monday 19th March 2007
quotequote all
GavinPearson said:
Simple answer is to tell the dealer to put some effort into fixing the problem.

If the engine has a diagnostic function the use of a blanking plate could be detected and limit the engine performance. EGR should also improve part load fuel economy plus give emissions benefits, so it's probably best to have it working correctly.


The dealer in question became rather unprofessional. Even though the car was exhibiting textbook EGR valve fault (as I've now confirmed -- I blanked it off and it's now spot on), he decided to waste two hours thrashing the car up and down the road ("it was smoking, it's never gone over 40mph" was his "expert" assessment) and cleaning the exhaust manifold. For some reason when I told him I wasn't paying for this lunacy he got all upset.

I may take it to another dealer, but since there were no faults recorded already (and it's been very wrong for a couple of hundred miles) I'm doubtful that EGR function is actually monitored. Plus I'm not comfortable with a)pumping exhaust gas through the engine and b)fixing something that'll only go wrong again in another couple of years' time for absolutely no good reason.

SM

supermono

Original Poster:

7,368 posts

249 months

Tuesday 3rd April 2007
quotequote all
A quick update for those interested. I put a plate on the inlet manifold side of the pipe blocking off the faulty EGR valve. Immediately the car worked the way it should, though for the test drive it belched plenty of black shite out of the exhaust on WOT. But soon settled down and has been fine since. About 500 miles on no engine light, no running problems whatsoever.

So far I'd recommend it as a free fix to the crappy EGR / Treehugger valve problem.

Cheers
SM

AntMat

94 posts

206 months

Wednesday 4th April 2007
quotequote all
No doubt I shall be shat upon from a great height for suggesting this but there is a thread on Parker's in the FAQ Forum. I make no apologies for the fact that I wrote it.

The EGR valve has a well defined function in modern common rail TDs. It's malfunction can, given time, cause a turbo to fail. TD engines, particularly TWAT (Thin Wall Alloy Technology) ones like Renault's 1.9dCi, rely on the introduction of NOx as a cooling gas to cut emissions. Failure to do so will increase both the temperature of the oil and the exhaust gasses. This, in turn, may well hasten the demise of the turbo.

supermono

Original Poster:

7,368 posts

249 months

Wednesday 4th April 2007
quotequote all
So where were you when I asked about possible side effects before? Thanks for the heads up, I'll book it in to my local main dealer (a different one!) for the work to be done under warranty...

SM

AntMat

94 posts

206 months

Wednesday 4th April 2007
quotequote all
When you asked the question before I do not believe that I was a member of this august forum. Unhappily for some, though I shall no doubt have to continue with verbal abuse and bullying, I shall remain a member and try to contribute something useful as I do on a number of other forums and elsewhere!

wildoliver

8,789 posts

217 months

Wednesday 4th April 2007
quotequote all
You may not believe this Anthony but this comment isn't designed to disagree with you.

I am dubious of the benefits of NO or N2 as a cooling means as they are coming from the exhaust side and being fed in to the inlet side, (also not heard of tt either but if it exists brilliant nickname!).

I would suggest the chap watches his water temp closely as his car won't have oil temp gauge, and if it does rise noticably then he replaces it (see I do agree with you at times) but really don't think he will have any major issues with turbo failure due to direct heat as they are fine on petrol engines which run hotter exhaust gasses.

AntMat

94 posts

206 months

Wednesday 4th April 2007
quotequote all
Why therefore I wonder is the % rate of turbo failures higher on diesels than on turbos? What do you think Oliver?

My reckoning is that the amount of condensate produced is higher in TDs than in PDs. UK traffic conditions are not condusive to well blown out engines and this is far more so with diesels - just watch your black cabs letting loose on the M4 after the flyoversmokin. Almost as bad as a WW1 destroyer on convoy duty! Whilst the heat generated in the combustion chamber of a petrol engine is higher, the heat loss is more rapid and I have noticed that coolant temperature on a diesel can run higher than on a similar model with a petrol engine.

Again this could be down to malfunctioning EGR valves which unfortunately have a tendency to stick closed rather than open.

Mechatronic EGR valves are linked into the EMS so that if the valve is disconnected, the EMS could think that there is a malfunction and possibly cause the car to go into "limp home" mode.

It is very easy for dealers to check EGR valves as Pierburg has produced a number of testing tools for different makes. These are available and should form part of a main dealer's armoury.



wildoliver

8,789 posts

217 months

Wednesday 4th April 2007
quotequote all
I don't know, I would guess it could have something to do with more low down work which results in the turbo frequently stalling and having to wind back up which must be the most stressful part of a turbo's life, plus dirtier exhaust gases clogging them up, and lack of care from owners (switching engine straight off after run, thrashing from cold) dirtier oil, there are loads of possibles, but I don't know.

AntMat

94 posts

206 months

Wednesday 4th April 2007
quotequote all
I don't think that letting the engine run on for a bit with a TD will help the turbo as there is less likelihood of "coking" due to lower bearing temperatures. I would still advocate a 100% synthetic oil though as it will further reduce the chance of turbo damage.

It is a well recorded fact that Renault, BMW and VAG have all had major problems with turbo failures in their TD lumps. It is rumoured that some ECUs have been remapped to account for UK road conditions. Who knows?

But my maxim is:

Clean Oil + Clean Air ~ Cooler Oil Less Aggrevation

equates to

Coca ~ Cola!




Edited by AntMat on Wednesday 4th April 20:45