Death to FI. Phase 1
Discussion
stevieturbo said:
Brummie revved his pretty high didnt he ?
Was he hydraulic or solid ?
I agree it probably isnt fair test because the CR had a bigger profile. It would have been interesting to do a similar profile, just to see if the SR have better valvetrain stability which would have led to any gains, or if there really isnt any difference between the two
I have seen tests of HR to SR and guess what.. HR is virtually the same except perhaps 2 or 3 bhp which as a % was pretty much zero.Was he hydraulic or solid ?
I agree it probably isnt fair test because the CR had a bigger profile. It would have been interesting to do a similar profile, just to see if the SR have better valvetrain stability which would have led to any gains, or if there really isnt any difference between the two
Mainly due to HR vs HT and spring technologies and better lifters etc. Virtually no difference now for street use.
A better HR vs SR test http://www.dragzine.com/tech-stories/engine/dyno-s...
If they were same lift Id suggest there would be same power. So HR wins for maintenance reasons IMO.
Of course if you are running 1" of lift etc you dont have much choice and solid is the only option.
If they were same lift Id suggest there would be same power. So HR wins for maintenance reasons IMO.
Of course if you are running 1" of lift etc you dont have much choice and solid is the only option.
ringram said:
A better HR vs SR test http://www.dragzine.com/tech-stories/engine/dyno-s...
If they were same lift Id suggest there would be same power. So HR wins for maintenance reasons IMO.
Of course if you are running 1" of lift etc you dont have much choice and solid is the only option.
I seen that one, but it isnt an LS with it's little springs etcIf they were same lift Id suggest there would be same power. So HR wins for maintenance reasons IMO.
Of course if you are running 1" of lift etc you dont have much choice and solid is the only option.
That seems to be the LS's weak link, tiny valve springs. Although there are many great spring options these days.
jameshsv said:
Blue383 said:
Do you have a link for that?
That wont please stick if the fazt intake is better than the harrop intake.http://www.corvetteforum.com/forums/c6-z06-discuss...
TBH I told Stick he should have got a Fast way back when he was fighting with the Jenvey. But it does tame larger cams.
ringram said:
jameshsv said:
Blue383 said:
Do you have a link for that?
That wont please stick if the fazt intake is better than the harrop intake.http://www.corvetteforum.com/forums/c6-z06-discuss...
TBH I told Stick he should have got a Fast way back when he was fighting with the Jenvey. But it does tame larger cams.
ringram said:
jameshsv said:
Blue383 said:
Do you have a link for that?
That wont please stick if the fazt intake is better than the harrop intake.http://www.corvetteforum.com/forums/c6-z06-discuss...
TBH I told Stick he should have got a Fast way back when he was fighting with the Jenvey. But it does tame larger cams.
stick100 on facebook said:
The comment on ring rams post was the fast makes more powerbit might do but the throttle response of itbs is 20% better and you can run any cam you want
Gassing Station | HSV & Monaro | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff