Thunder Road

Author
Discussion

granjuiceymoose

309 posts

161 months

Sunday 8th March 2015
quotequote all
How much difference does a 3.9 diff actually make to acceleration?

jameshsv

5,844 posts

161 months

Sunday 8th March 2015
quotequote all
granjuiceymoose said:
How much difference does a 3.9 diff actually make to acceleration?
Acceloration is good depending on what power you have.Top speed you lose a bit

stevieturbo

17,271 posts

248 months

Sunday 8th March 2015
quotequote all
granjuiceymoose said:
How much difference does a 3.9 diff actually make to acceleration?
Depends on power and traction available.

Lower powered cars will benefit more than higher powered cars.

Largely because higher powered sill suffer more traction loss with shorter gearing

anonymous-user

55 months

Sunday 8th March 2015
quotequote all
I wonder if the T56 from another car would work better, either with a longer 5th or shorter 6th? I think the longer 5th would work better, wonder which one of these has the same input shaft length as the Monaro? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Borg-Warner_T-56_tran...

1386-000-013 looks interesting...

Edited by anonymous-user on Sunday 8th March 18:58

M11 MFP

687 posts

194 months

Sunday 8th March 2015
quotequote all
Now that's a nice intake for TR. The NACA ducts squash up to the airboxes and everything. Ideas for Stick.

Don't remember the hrt427 being fitted with that from HSV, so must be a recent addition?


ARAF

20,759 posts

224 months

Sunday 8th March 2015
quotequote all
yes Looks ideal for Stick. cool

R8VXF

Original Poster:

6,788 posts

116 months

Sunday 8th March 2015
quotequote all
Looks very similar to the HRT setup from a few years ago. IIRC they had dual carbon airboxes fitted in a similar manner.

stevieturbo

17,271 posts

248 months

Sunday 8th March 2015
quotequote all
wormus said:
I wonder if the T56 from another car would work better, either with a longer 5th or shorter 6th? I think the longer 5th would work better, wonder which one of these has the same input shaft length as the Monaro? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Borg-Warner_T-56_tran...

1386-000-013 looks interesting...

Edited by wormus on Sunday 8th March 18:58
That's just bog standard CV8 tall ratios anyway ? Same as F-Body camaro, same ratios I've been using for 12-13 years.

Gary H 2008

3,507 posts

190 months

Sunday 8th March 2015
quotequote all
wormus said:
I wonder if the T56 from another car would work better, either with a longer 5th or shorter 6th? I think the longer 5th would work better, wonder which one of these has the same input shaft length as the Monaro? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Borg-Warner_T-56_tran...

1386-000-013 looks interesting...

Edited by wormus on Sunday 8th March 18:58
Not really. A .709 5th is far more interesting.

stevieturbo

17,271 posts

248 months

Sunday 8th March 2015
quotequote all
Gary H 2008 said:
Not really. A .709 5th is far more interesting.
Not with a 1:1 4th

The 0.74/0.5 gears set is tall, the rpm drop with the 4-5 shift isnt great, but if you have enough and a good spread of power it isnt a big deal.

But a drop to 0.71 is pretty huge. You really will need a good powerband for that.

Of course you can try and counteract this with a very short diff..but then you lose the speed ability from 5th in the first place which makes it pointless.

May as well just choose one of the shorter 6th gears instead, 0.67 or 0.73 seem to be the shortest options in a T56 style trans

Gary H 2008

3,507 posts

190 months

Monday 9th March 2015
quotequote all
Nope.

My theory was proved correct. The car was still pulling with a over a 1000 usable revs left in 5th at TR

stevieturbo

17,271 posts

248 months

Monday 9th March 2015
quotequote all
Gary H 2008 said:
Nope.

My theory was proved correct. The car was still pulling with a over a 1000 usable revs left in 5th at TR
That just proves your gearing was far too tall...otherwise you'd have made use of those extra 1000rpms and went faster.

That's like saying my 6th gear that's capable of say 300mph is ideal because after 1 mile I was still accelerating and had more rpm's to go.

anonymous-user

55 months

Monday 9th March 2015
quotequote all
stevieturbo said:
Not with a 1:1 4th

The 0.74/0.5 gears set is tall, the rpm drop with the 4-5 shift isnt great, but if you have enough and a good spread of power it isnt a big deal.

But a drop to 0.71 is pretty huge. You really will need a good powerband for that.

Of course you can try and counteract this with a very short diff..but then you lose the speed ability from 5th in the first place which makes it pointless.

May as well just choose one of the shorter 6th gears instead, 0.67 or 0.73 seem to be the shortest options in a T56 style trans
I don't think the guys with shorter 6th (Harry and Emma?) have reported amazing results. Don't think anyone has tried a slightly taller 5th though. I'm sure the FI cars would have the power to pull it.

Gary H 2008

3,507 posts

190 months

Monday 9th March 2015
quotequote all
stevieturbo said:
Gary H 2008 said:
Nope.

My theory was proved correct. The car was still pulling with a over a 1000 usable revs left in 5th at TR
That just proves your gearing was far too tall...otherwise you'd have made use of those extra 1000rpms and went faster.

That's like saying my 6th gear that's capable of say 300mph is ideal because after 1 mile I was still accelerating and had more rpm's to go.
The issue with the standard 5th ratio is you run out of puff at 164ish. Change up and you're into the ridiculously tall 6th that you will bog down, hence bouncing off the limiter in 5th was the only way to get a decent trap speed.
The compromise is extending the 5th with a different gearset so the theoretical limit is 192 - meaning you get closer to the reline in 5th, maximising your potential of a decent 1 mile trap.

raving

1,183 posts

191 months

Monday 9th March 2015
quotequote all
I run a .74 5th with a 3.07 diff ratio

stevieturbo

17,271 posts

248 months

Monday 9th March 2015
quotequote all
wormus said:
I don't think the guys with shorter 6th (Harry and Emma?) have reported amazing results. Don't think anyone has tried a slightly taller 5th though. I'm sure the FI cars would have the power to pull it.
The Tranzilla 6th is basically same as my 5th. Emma's Magnum 6th is probably taller though, and 5th shorter.


Gary H 2008 said:
The issue with the standard 5th ratio is you run out of puff at 164ish. Change up and you're into the ridiculously tall 6th that you will bog down, hence bouncing off the limiter in 5th was the only way to get a decent trap speed.
The compromise is extending the 5th with a different gearset so the theoretical limit is 192 - meaning you get closer to the reline in 5th, maximising your potential of a decent 1 mile trap.
Depends which box you're using and referring to as standard. My bog standard Camaro 5th at 0.74, same as CV8 Monaro will let me see over 200mph at less than 7000rpm. 202mph was hit at around 67-6800rpm a few years ago.
3.27 rear diff and 255/40x17 tyres, or now using 235/45x17. Little odds between them

TOTB last year as an example, I shifted a little early from 4th at 6500rpm as had no grip anyway. This still dropped me to around 4300rpm in 5th, that's around 130-135mph.
That's a big drop, mine can cope with it ok though. If 5th was 0.71, it'd probably drop below 4000rpm, clearly that would be very bad unless you had say a PD blower, or an engine making lots of torque at 4000rpm

The Tranzilla Jez seems to be going for now would obviously drop him right onto good strong power almost anywhere he shifts from 4th, and likewise from 5-6.

I'm just not prepared to lose my tall 6th gear as it's great for cruising.

I could easily switch to the 0.84/0.63 5/6, but I really dont see it as gaining me anything. Hell..even with the tall 0.5 6th gear...I've went looking for a 7th the odd time when driving LOL

My current gearing combo will do anything I need it to do comfortably.

EmmaJ

4,525 posts

147 months

Monday 9th March 2015
quotequote all
I've got a low ratio 5th and 6th. 5th tops out just over 150ish I recall on a 6200 limit and 6th will run to just over 200 if things go to plan. I just need more power.......

stevieturbo

17,271 posts

248 months

Monday 9th March 2015
quotequote all
EmmaJ said:
I've got a low ratio 5th and 6th. 5th tops out just over 150ish I recall on a 6200 limit and 6th will run to just over 200 if things go to plan. I just need more power.......
You must be running a fairly short diff then ?

Ultimately when it comes to speed/distance, yes it is power you need. Gearing helps of course, but make enough power and gearing does become slightly less important as long as it still gives you enough for the speed/rpm you're trying to achieve.

If you arent making the power though, wont matter what gearing you have.

EmmaJ

4,525 posts

147 months

Monday 9th March 2015
quotequote all
stevieturbo said:
EmmaJ said:
I've got a low ratio 5th and 6th. 5th tops out just over 150ish I recall on a 6200 limit and 6th will run to just over 200 if things go to plan. I just need more power.......
You must be running a fairly short diff then ?

Ultimately when it comes to speed/distance, yes it is power you need. Gearing helps of course, but make enough power and gearing does become slightly less important as long as it still gives you enough for the speed/rpm you're trying to achieve.

If you arent making the power though, wont matter what gearing you have.
Not that short, I think from memory it is a 3.45 diff. 5th is definitely a lot lower than a stock VXR box put it that way! Though I have CV8 ratios on 1st - 4th which work really well with the extra power smile

stevieturbo

17,271 posts

248 months

Monday 9th March 2015
quotequote all
I cant think of any gear/tyre/diff combo that would yield speeds as low as 150mph at 6200rpm

Something musnt be right there

Shortest 5th I see for a Magnum is 0.8.

Even with a 25" tyre ( eg 255/35x18 ), 3.45 diff and at 6000rpm, that should yield approx 160mph