Rust

Author
Discussion

mfp4073

Original Poster:

1,946 posts

174 months

Sunday 19th February 2017
quotequote all
I have just been reading about some horror stories on the Dodge Challenger forums.
It appears that Dodge Challengers and Chargers have foam injected into their rocker panels(Sill's) at the factory. Guess what, this traps moisture, mud and salt. They are now rusting out quite badly after 5yrs or so.
There is also a suggestion that the new Camero also has foam injected into this area?
I'm not brand loyal, as I really like all muscle cars, but to think cars are being built with these problems in this day and age is unforgivable.
I take it that Monaro's and VXR8's do not have this problem?

Edited by mfp4073 on Sunday 19th February 19:42


Edited by mfp4073 on Sunday 19th February 19:43

TonyTwoTribes

356 posts

116 months

Sunday 19th February 2017
quotequote all
Nope mines fine




mfp4073

Original Poster:

1,946 posts

174 months

Sunday 19th February 2017
quotequote all
Yikes...

throwyourbike

704 posts

151 months

Monday 20th February 2017
quotequote all
I think any car can suffer from rust, some more than others obviously.

Monaro's and VXR8's have their weak points but the sills definitely aren't full of foam.

I did my sills wth Dinitrol RC900 and 3125 last summer. It's quite an easy job.

They were actually in really good shape for a 12 year old car though to be fair.

mfp4073

Original Poster:

1,946 posts

174 months

Monday 20th February 2017
quotequote all
Well no foam filled cavities is good to know.
I will be using some Dynax cavity spray on my car this year anyway, So if I find anything nasty I will update the forum.
Mind you, I cant help but feel sorry for the Challenger/Charger owners who have found major rust in their pride and joy already! what a bummer!

vxr2010

2,565 posts

159 months

Monday 20th February 2017
quotequote all
the monaro bonnet inside front lip can rust , i yearly check the cars over plus brake lines for rust and underseal again if it's needed

stevieturbo

17,263 posts

247 months

Monday 20th February 2017
quotequote all
mfp4073 said:
Well no foam filled cavities is good to know.
I will be using some Dynax cavity spray on my car this year anyway, So if I find anything nasty I will update the forum.
Mind you, I cant help but feel sorry for the Challenger/Charger owners who have found major rust in their pride and joy already! what a bummer!
You'd think that in this day and age, with all the fancy metal coatings etc...rust really should be a thing of the past unless a vehicle actually gets damaged.

Unless GM really did cheap out on the aforementioned cars and just paint them with no real protection ?

THUNDER STORM

1,251 posts

169 months

Tuesday 21st February 2017
quotequote all
Talking about rust, yesterday I had all brake pipes on my Monaro VXR 2005 changed. Reason the pipes looked ok, but when checking under all the rubber mountings which there are quite a few,some under panels along underside of car,what a shockyikes really bad rust.

One part of pipe when bent slightly just split in two really easy where rust was.

So to play safe I would suggest you all check yours out ASAP.

I had all mine replaced with pipes made with a copper/nickel content to stop further rusting.

I keep thinking how many hard driving miles would it have done before disaster.weeping

Stay safe guys and gals.

Adebyebye

mfp4073

Original Poster:

1,946 posts

174 months

Tuesday 21st February 2017
quotequote all
I had my brake pipes checked by MF just before Christmas and they seemed to be OK. However, I am tempted to have them replaced with copper items just to be on the safe side. My car was built in December 04, that was a long time ago.....still the rest of the underside looked to be in good condition.
Any idea of the cost and amount of time it would take to replace the brake pipes?

vxr2010

2,565 posts

159 months

Wednesday 22nd February 2017
quotequote all
not cheap as to do it with solid lines the rear subframe needs to come off , i maybe wrong i think i read somewhere on here that some one used flexible lines so subframe could be left on , i've also considered it on my 04 monaro , the place that gives you the best idea of how good or bad the lines are is in the ducting on the underside of the car slightly behind the drivers seat area , it gets full of dirt and the rubber grommets used to seperate the pipes does not look like it helps

mfp4073

Original Poster:

1,946 posts

174 months

Wednesday 22nd February 2017
quotequote all
vxr2010 said:
not cheap as to do it with solid lines the rear subframe needs to come off , i maybe wrong i think i read somewhere on here that some one used flexible lines so subframe could be left on , i've also considered it on my 04 monaro , the place that gives you the best idea of how good or bad the lines are is in the ducting on the underside of the car slightly behind the drivers seat area , it gets full of dirt and the rubber grommets used to seperate the pipes does not look like it helps
I have looked at that area before, but I couldn't figure out how to remove the cover!
Once the spring is here I will have another go. I have a spare can of Dynax rust proofer for that job.

THUNDER STORM

1,251 posts

169 months

Wednesday 22nd February 2017
quotequote all
As I reported all my pipes were replaced and the garage did not remove any main frame parts but he did say it was a pig to do the job. Even if the pipes are OK Just check under the rubber mounting points as I said earlier.

Adebyebye

MedwayMonaro

1,895 posts

138 months

Wednesday 22nd February 2017
quotequote all
mfp4073 said:
I have looked at that area before, but I couldn't figure out how to remove the cover!
Once the spring is here I will have another go. I have a spare can of Dynax rust proofer for that job.
Easy enough. Remove plastic securing nuts along each side. These will likely not be reusable. Undo bolts at front carefully as they are prone to snapping due to corrosion. Treat as a rusted bolt you wont go far wrong. There are 2 tabs that fold up into the other side of those rubber bungs. They are fiddly but can be pushed open to remove.

mfp4073

Original Poster:

1,946 posts

174 months

Thursday 23rd February 2017
quotequote all
MedwayMonaro said:
Easy enough. Remove plastic securing nuts along each side. These will likely not be reusable. Undo bolts at front carefully as they are prone to snapping due to corrosion. Treat as a rusted bolt you wont go far wrong. There are 2 tabs that fold up into the other side of those rubber bungs. They are fiddly but can be pushed open to remove.
OK, thanks for that I will have a look at that before my car goes back on the road. I have to admit I'm a little worried as to what I might Find.....actually, make that.....terrified as to what's hidden in there!!!!!!!

ringram

14,700 posts

248 months

Sunday 26th February 2017
quotequote all
mfp4073 said:
It appears that Dodge Challengers and Chargers have foam injected into their rocker panels(Sill's) at the factory. Guess what, this traps moisture, mud and salt. They are now rusting out quite badly after 5yrs or so.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planned_obsolescence

a policy of planning or designing a product with an artificially limited useful life, so it will become obsolete (that is, unfashionable or no longer functional) after a certain period of time.[1] The rationale behind the strategy is to generate long-term sales volume by reducing the time between repeat purchases

mfp4073

Original Poster:

1,946 posts

174 months

Sunday 26th February 2017
quotequote all
ringram said:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planned_obsolescence

a policy of planning or designing a product with an artificially limited useful life, so it will become obsolete (that is, unfashionable or no longer functional) after a certain period of time.[1] The rationale behind the strategy is to generate long-term sales volume by reducing the time between repeat purchases
That is rather depressing...and I think counter productive for car makers to do that.
You would think a manufacturer would want a solid build quality reputation.
But what do I know?

monkfish1

11,067 posts

224 months

Monday 27th February 2017
quotequote all
mfp4073 said:
That is rather depressing...and I think counter productive for car makers to do that.
You would think a manufacturer would want a solid build quality reputation.
But what do I know?
Sadly Ringram is correct. Cars that lasted would be counterproductive.


notransistors

278 posts

155 months

Sunday 5th March 2017
quotequote all
Chrysler used to be automotive royalty. Now it is nothing more than a division of Fiat. So how can it be high quality, when Fiat is known for making nothing more than motorized Tinker Toys?