supercharger

Author
Discussion

anonymous-user

55 months

Sunday 13th July 2008
quotequote all
If you don't have a blower already get one of the new 6th gen TVS blowers (MP1900 or 2300) as they move more air than any other previous generation. However, as Richard says pressure is not the indication of power, it's the movement of gasses through the engine. Get some heads, cam, and headers and you will see the power. The blower just need to feed in enough air.

Don't bother with the 112 unless you are sure you don't want to upgrade as it's better to have a big blower with loads of spare capacity you can use later on.

Edited by anonymous-user on Sunday 13th July 18:47

Dragonball

117 posts

192 months

Sunday 13th July 2008
quotequote all
My requirement will be around town pottling and then something that will mash a porker alomg the dual / motorway

TBH - reliability is more important than raw power

(I say that now of course!) smile

Keep posting your thoughts - very interesting reading

Cheers for the input


ringram

14,700 posts

249 months

Sunday 13th July 2008
quotequote all
... its a sliding scale, nothing is more reliable than stock.

Mystvxr

427 posts

199 months

Sunday 13th July 2008
quotequote all
My gains from the 112 were 20% power (from 320 to 384hp) and 10% more torque (from 345 to 385lb) all figures at the wheels. Thing is, the extra power seems to be made right at the top of the rev range, not surprising with FI I guess, up to about 4200 rpm the power and torque is pretty much the same as before.

I'll move to the 122 if Walkinshaw can sort something out for me, probably want the biggest kit they do! I'd love to do cam and heads but should be pushing the limits on the gearbox with the 122 blower.

stevieturbo

17,271 posts

248 months

Sunday 13th July 2008
quotequote all
Low rpm torque from a Maggie or any Rootes style blower, should be the most noticeable improvements !!!!

Dragonball

117 posts

192 months

Sunday 13th July 2008
quotequote all
Mystvxr said:
My gains from the 112 were 20% power (from 320 to 384hp) and 10% more torque (from 345 to 385lb) all figures at the wheels. Thing is, the extra power seems to be made right at the top of the rev range, not surprising with FI I guess, up to about 4200 rpm the power and torque is pretty much the same as before.

I'll move to the 122 if Walkinshaw can sort something out for me, probably want the biggest kit they do! I'd love to do cam and heads but should be pushing the limits on the gearbox with the 122 blower.
Interesting...

Not as much as I would have thought TBH?

stevieturbo

17,271 posts

248 months

Sunday 13th July 2008
quotequote all
I guess unless the same tuner was mapping all these cars....there is no way to compare one with another.

Some tuners can get better results than others....

Are there any DynoDynamics graphs for Aussie built cars of similar spec ?? for comparison ?

Wheel figures of coursewink

Dragonball

117 posts

192 months

Sunday 13th July 2008
quotequote all
The Monkfish dyno chart shows the Harrup at 12psi on the CV8 2004

Gains

HP From 273 to 531
TQ From 270 to 509

I would be happy at 9psi and reduced gains

Anything over 450 TQ has got to be good smile

Mystvxr

427 posts

199 months

Sunday 13th July 2008
quotequote all
Dragonball said:

Not as much as I would have thought TBH?


Me neither.. and at a cost of £109 per rwhp it was an expensive lesson.

ringram

14,700 posts

249 months

Monday 14th July 2008
quotequote all
If people search they will find some dyno dynamic stuff from vixpy's dyno day. rwhp from a few supercharged harrops etc.
He has another on the way smile
Should be interesting.

ringram

14,700 posts

249 months

Monday 14th July 2008
quotequote all
Roger did my install last time. I just gave him the bits.

As for your trans, the more power you pump in, the more likely it is to bust frown No definately there. Guys have had bad boxes with stock setups.

Depends on your power requirements and budget. Like Gelf suggests an L92 setup and intake will bolt on. Throw in a mild cam and you should have a nice setup. Mind you most of the cost is in labour, so I always like to get the best parts within reason. Therefore you could look at some WCCH CNC L92 heads and ask them about intake porting too. Make sure you can get loads of airflow, because airflow = power.

Alternately, ETP, TFS, Dart, AFR heads are all good for the cathedral setup. If you are going blower with the L92's you will want a different model as it will need to mate up to the heads. BUT the nice thing is that its the same as the SS Commodore and now the new G8 Pontiac so there should be plenty of options, like the Maggie.

if you are going to supercharge and want to keep costs down the 225cc Dart heads will bolt to your current intake manifold. Pop a 224/228 or 220/224 cam in and things will get very interesting with the supercharger. Heads and cam should be 400rwhp by themselves! Then supercharge later and no loss of parts you have already bought.

TTLS1

140 posts

208 months

Monday 14th July 2008
quotequote all
you guys tend to bang on about the same stuff over and over.

Ringram you well know that an engine is a big air-pump...the more air and fuel you put in the more hp it will make. BUT you do not have to spend thousands on heads, big cams, after-market manifolds 90mm throttle bodies etc...etc. If your going to invest in an FI set-up let it make the HP, spend the money on the bottom end and pump up the PSI!

Listen to someone who has spent the money, made the mistakes and learnt from them. I've a modest set up as far as the engine spec goes; stock heads (just with a set of crane rollers & springs), stock manifold & throttle body, stock HSV GTS camshaft (GTS 300kw), stock crank, lunati rods, JE pistons. That's it! I'm making 588rwhp @ 10 psi with my pair of hair dryers. That's through the A4 and 4000 stall mind you.

As I said spend the money to make it last and let the blower make the HP for you.

Big NA horsies are a different kettle of fish.

ringram

14,700 posts

249 months

Monday 14th July 2008
quotequote all
For optimal power you still need to look at heads and cam. You are right though the more PSI you push the more air will get in there. But also the more heat and energy losses will occur.

I know we harp on about the same stuff over again, the same things are still important. I think if you look at any stout installs elsewhere in the world virtually nobody will be running a stock top end and cam!

ukvoyager.info

2,780 posts

223 months

Monday 14th July 2008
quotequote all
TTLS1 said:
you guys tend to bang on about the same stuff over and over.
Is that not because the same questions get asked?

Q1. What MPG do you get?

Q2. How can I get more power?

Q3. Is flaking door handles / wet carpets / broken f'ing gearboxes / [insert one of many common faults here] normal?

Dragonball

117 posts

192 months

Monday 14th July 2008
quotequote all
Before this turns into another measuring contest smile

I am just trying to find out the best supercharger for my CV8

No change from Stock internals...

Which supercharger will give me the best bang per buck (not literally! smile)...

How much should I expect to achieve (HP and TQ)...

What difference will this make to the drivability...

How much will it cost...

Who from...

Not interested in 600+ HP - never will be - too specialised



Edited by Dragonball on Monday 14th July 12:46

TTLS1

140 posts

208 months

Monday 14th July 2008
quotequote all
Sorry Dragonball, just wanted to throw a little something different into the ring and watch it get punched around by the same-old same-olds.

If you require info on Super-Charging your on the right forum, every second car has got one.



Edited by TTLS1 on Monday 14th July 12:57

TTLS1

140 posts

208 months

Monday 14th July 2008
quotequote all
ukvoyager.info said:
TTLS1 said:
you guys tend to bang on about the same stuff over and over.
Is that not because the same questions get asked?

Q1. What MPG do you get?

Q2. How can I get more power?

Q3. Is flaking door handles / wet carpets / broken f'ing gearboxes / [insert one of many common faults here] normal?


I have the answers for you:

1: not alot
2: supercharger
3: yes

P15TON

476 posts

237 months

Monday 14th July 2008
quotequote all
I'm outer here
...This one's gonna BLOW!!!!

TTLS1

140 posts

208 months

Monday 14th July 2008
quotequote all
don't worry, it's all good P15TON. Just some friendly banter...without it it'd be a rather dull old forum.

I do have some real advice though without the pi55-taking.

drive some demo cars, get a feel for the product you fancy, then make the decision yourself.

monkfish1

11,112 posts

225 months

Monday 14th July 2008
quotequote all
TTLS1 said:

drive some demo cars, get a feel for the product you fancy, then make the decision yourself.


Good advice.