HSV forum members -The performance chart...

HSV forum members -The performance chart...

Author
Discussion

toothrot

22,454 posts

210 months

Thursday 18th June 2009
quotequote all
me memory has gone all blank.... driving

Mystvxr

427 posts

198 months

Friday 19th June 2009
quotequote all
Then on the 4th, I shall refresh it for you! shoot

kiwifraser

Original Poster:

4,386 posts

194 months

Friday 19th June 2009
quotequote all
Thanks for the updates everyone. I have no idea who number 37 was either. Ive been away for a couple me days, but will update the chart when i get a few minutes.

kiwifraser

Original Poster:

4,386 posts

194 months

Friday 19th June 2009
quotequote all
toothrot said:
how come I'm not in the non=holden group?

Will be interesting to compare Sophies turbo setup to the NA of the s2000. Not sure how much power she is putting down now but my car is stock and manufacturer claims of 238/240bhp. I think my biggest concern is that to get things motoring really comes at 5500 rpm to the 9k shift, it fair old flies but will be interesting on the day as it will be down to my technique on the line. I also have had the notorious missed 3rd gear once or twice

Can't wait for the day

ETA bonnies isn't stock, its actually had a remap which was proven at the last dyno day. Always thought her car felt strong now we know why hehe

Edited by toothrot on Tuesday 16th June 00:58
You weren't on the list, because I had no data for your new car...
I'll add a line for you smile


ETA:
In the stock list I have included Mel's car.
I figured the class differentiation was mainly to show the cars which have had superchargers fitted or are NA with internal work done, versus those with stock engine internals. Therefore by description it that means Air filter, remap, minor exhaust changes cars can fit into the stock class. These are achievable for under £500, without ever opening the engine, which brings them well in reach of mass market. I would say a K&N filter is almost considered a standard replacement part in a service, so they shouldn't be classed against Ringram/ Madmunky/ etc.
Anyone object? or offer a better idea?


Edited by kiwifraser on Friday 19th June 10:08

kiwifraser

Original Poster:

4,386 posts

194 months

Friday 19th June 2009
quotequote all
First post now updated with everyone's offerings biggrin

MyM8V8

9,457 posts

195 months

Friday 19th June 2009
quotequote all
kiwifraser said:
First post now updated with everyone's offerings biggrin
Well done Fraser and thanks for this.

(Although I'm not sure whether this all means we are out and out enthusiasts or anoraks?)

toothrot

22,454 posts

210 months

Friday 19th June 2009
quotequote all
I disagree, a remap is a serious modification and clearly changes the car from stock. This will give Mel a very unfair advantage over those of us who are bone stock. She has, as a result, nearly 50hp more than a stock car. Of course as I have a ricer with a paltry 240bhp this is irrelevant to me but to others I feel it only fair to put mel right into the modified list.

this will make my victory even sweeter wink

Bonnie and Clyde

11,701 posts

192 months

Friday 19th June 2009
quotequote all
toothrot said:
I disagree, a remap is a serious modification and clearly changes the car from stock. This will give Mel a very unfair advantage over those of us who are bone stock. She has, as a result, nearly 50hp more than a stock car. Of course as I have a ricer with a paltry 240bhp this is irrelevant to me but to others I feel it only fair to put mel right into the modified list.

this will make my victory even sweeter
Dream on sh1t head hehe How on earth is my Monaro anything but stock? Frasers right, you cant put me in the same category as Madmunky. You'll do anything to come out on top. However your gonna need more than the tin can to beat me BTW love you Stig in my rear view mirrorxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx


Monkfish looking forward to speaking to you in a bit

Edited by Bonnie and Clyde on Friday 19th June 13:31

donk r8

2,755 posts

196 months

Friday 19th June 2009
quotequote all


Hi Fraser, mine is completly stock apart from intake and exhaust, don't want to be in the modified just yet.................

toothrot

22,454 posts

210 months

Friday 19th June 2009
quotequote all
as proved on the dyno mel you put out the same power with just a remap as cars with headers, exhausts, highflow cats = modified. Fraiser, son, you know what to do

Bonnie and Clyde

11,701 posts

192 months

Friday 19th June 2009
quotequote all
toothrot said:
as proved on the dyno mel you put out the same power with just a remap as cars with headers, exhausts, highflow cats = modified. Fraiser, son, you know what to do
You see you don't realise yet Stiggy baby, my cars a maverick. Its just one in a million. However Fraser you may need to change my stats as of the 2nd July

toothrot

22,454 posts

210 months

Friday 19th June 2009
quotequote all
aw scared of the nasty man in the uber cool uber stylish (its yellow) car beating you

bless

ringram

14,700 posts

248 months

Friday 19th June 2009
quotequote all
toothrot said:
aw scared of the nasty man in the uber cool uber stylish (its yellow) car beating you

bless
You go girl


Trailermasher

730 posts

222 months

Friday 19th June 2009
quotequote all
Hi Fraser,

great job with the list.

For my run at Shakey's the car was "stock", except for the WP zorst. Nothing to do with driver skill, couldn't see where I was going, got to give the credit to the auto box.

HH122 (but basic tune) added for PVS'09, best runs, 13.22@106 and 13.29@109... must check that.

The tune has had a tweak by WP in Oz, so will have to see how that works out for the 4th July!

Could list in both stock and modified for comparison?

Bonnie and Clyde said:
However Fraser you may need to change my stats as of the 2nd July smile
tell us more ! wink


toothrot

22,454 posts

210 months

Friday 19th June 2009
quotequote all
ringram said:
toothrot said:
aw scared of the nasty man in the uber cool uber stylish (its yellow) car beating you

bless
You go girl

lol

kiwifraser

Original Poster:

4,386 posts

194 months

Saturday 20th June 2009
quotequote all
Trailermasher said:
13.22@106 and 13.29@109
let me know which is right and I'll put it up.


Trailermasher said:
Could list in both stock and modified for comparison?
Will do!! smile


wolfracer

2,074 posts

206 months

Saturday 20th June 2009
quotequote all
Frazer, the time you have for me is incorrect, I only did the 2 runs and have both slips, first was against LSX11, and the second against 4P10, which was my fastest, 14.104 and 101.05.
05 CV8 with performance pack, (Full exhaust inc headers and remap) ta.

SimonV8ster

12,605 posts

228 months

Saturday 20th June 2009
quotequote all
Add me to the chart if you want.

333hp (at wheels) 416ftlb (at wheels)

SimonV8ster - Blue 04 CV8 - Headers/SportCats/Wortec/Remapped.

toothrot

22,454 posts

210 months

Saturday 20th June 2009
quotequote all
SimonV8ster said:
Add me to the chart if you want.

333hp (at wheels) 416ftlb (at wheels)

SimonV8ster - Blue 04 CV8 - Headers/SportCats/Wortec/Remapped.
figures do not compute for your mods, almost 100ft/lb extra at the wheels than hp and thats 416ft/lb at wheels from just exhaust and remap? Typo?

SimonV8ster

12,605 posts

228 months

Saturday 20th June 2009
quotequote all
Well thats what I thought to be honest !! I think there might be a mistake on the graph where they've laid the torque figure at engine over the bhp at the wheels. ermm.....