Login | Register
SearchMy Stuff
My ProfileMy PreferencesMy Mates RSS Feed
1
3 4 ... 9 10
Reply to Topic
Author Discussion

LongLiveTazio

2,514 posts

66 months

[news] 
Wednesday 20th June 2012 quote quote all
Think this looks superb. Front splitter won't be controversial in the flesh because you won't be looking at it from these photo angles, you'll be standing up. Spoiler looks exquisite. Really really impressed, think it's really cohesive and the interior is sublime.

George H

10,206 posts

33 months

[news] 
Wednesday 20th June 2012 quote quote all
KarlFranz said:
I'll wait for the manual gearbox version with clear taillights to be available before I buy.
I have a feeling you will be waiting a very long time (for the manual box anyway, surely the clear rears are only a matter of time) smile

Agoogy

6,495 posts

117 months

[news] 
Wednesday 20th June 2012 quote quote all
LongLiveTazio said:
Think this looks superb. Front splitter won't be controversial in the flesh because you won't be looking at it from these photo angles, you'll be standing up. Spoiler looks exquisite. Really really impressed, think it's really cohesive and the interior is sublime.
Also the carbon bits and bobs (including the splitter) are available in body colour...

peterr96

1,695 posts

44 months

[news] 
Wednesday 20th June 2012 quote quote all
The more I look at it, the more of a brute it looks.
And I like that. The original V8 Vantage and the Vanquish both have those qualities IMO.
I too am unconvinced by the carbon splitter.
Maybe we could debate the effect of painting it body coloured! smile

RichB

24,231 posts

153 months

[news] 
Wednesday 20th June 2012 quote quote all
Agoogy said:
LongLiveTazio said:
Think this looks superb. Front splitter won't be controversial in the flesh because you won't be looking at it from these photo angles, you'll be standing up. Spoiler looks exquisite. Really really impressed, think it's really cohesive and the interior is sublime.
Also the carbon bits and bobs (including the splitter) are available in body colour...
I think in a more suitable colour and with a number plate on the front the spliter will be disguised.

Perhaps someone could photoshop a plate onto this?

pic stolen from another thread
Advertisement

peterr96

1,695 posts

44 months

[news] 
Wednesday 20th June 2012 quote quote all
RichB said:
Perhaps someone could photoshop a plate onto this?
Given the efforts with the custard tins I'm not sure we'll learn much hehe

LukeyLikey

431 posts

16 months

[news] 
Wednesday 20th June 2012 quote quote all
Read a general thread about this car on PH - mainly negative, 'boring' Aston, 'left behind' blah blah.

Mainly from people who will probably never buy one. I think the look of this car is just right and the price/power pitches it well.

Looks-wise it is as sporty as an F12, performance and price like a Bentley. No one else is doing that and mixed in with the 'tailor made suit' image which makes Astons a brilliant anachronism (I.e. big power, brutal performance, but somehow smart and socially acceptable) I think this is a good thing.

Also love the new interior. A very clever update that maintains all the expensive components (instrument binnacle for example) in a much newer and still classy environment.

Aston do need to do a more powerful version but that will no doubt come. Seems this car and the DBS are as different under the skin as a 964 and 993 - and no-one complained the 993 was too much of an evolution.

Why not the front and rear splitter/spoiler; it makes the whole thing appear harder edged than a Bentley, which no doubt it is?

Having said all that, I won't be swapping my DBS manual for one.

I went to Le Mans with a guy who had a 964. Having always loved 993s, that 964 seemed just as fabulous, in fact I think I actually preferred the appearance because it was somehow more closely linked to the original.

In the end, upgrading at a cost of £100k for a 10,000 mile newer car just doesn't seem sensible.


CatalystV12V

426 posts

50 months

[news] 
Wednesday 20th June 2012 quote quote all
Any hard facts about how they increased the the power output of the V12?.. I know there's been a lot of talk about VVT, has this been confirmed... Or did they steal Yeti's new exhaust biggrin

Rex Racer

340 posts

23 months

[news] 
Wednesday 20th June 2012 quote quote all
Speaking of power, I'm surprised there isn't more discussion here on the expected specs of this car. Personally, I'm disappointed that the car doesn't have more power -- it only has about 50 bhp more than its successor had nearly 10 years ago, and a lot has changed in the sports car world since then. I'm sure that Aston could have mustered at least 600 bhp. BR certainly could have. Yes, it's only a number and yes we're talking about a street car, but IMO Aston needed to provide more for its flagship car, especially when it's an "all new" Vanquish instead of just a refresh of the DBS (which I think it actually is).

:J:

2,538 posts

94 months

[news] 
Wednesday 20th June 2012 quote quote all
Rex Racer said:
Speaking of power, I'm surprised there isn't more discussion here on the expected specs of this car. Personally, I'm disappointed that the car doesn't have more power -- it only has about 50 bhp more than its successor had nearly 10 years ago, and a lot has changed in the sports car world since then. I'm sure that Aston could have mustered at least 600 bhp. BR certainly could have. Yes, it's only a number and yes we're talking about a street car, but IMO Aston needed to provide more for its flagship car, especially when it's an "all new" Vanquish instead of just a refresh of the DBS (which I think it actually is).
It's not about the headline figure, it's about how it uses it, and by all accounts, it uses it very well smile

Rex Racer

340 posts

23 months

[news] 
Wednesday 20th June 2012 quote quote all
Yeah, I think Aston still need an impressive number for attracting buyers if nothing else. 565 bhp (or whatever the actual number will be) just doesn't get it done when all of your competitors (and many of those below you) offer significantly more. It'd be another story if the car was super lightweight ala Lotus, but I don't believe that to be the case.

:J:

2,538 posts

94 months

[news] 
Wednesday 20th June 2012 quote quote all
Rex Racer said:
Yeah, I think Aston still need an impressive number for attracting buyers if nothing else. 565 bhp (or whatever the actual number will be) just doesn't get it done when all of your competitors (and many of those below you) offer significantly more. It'd be another story if the car was super lightweight ala Lotus, but I don't believe that to be the case.
You might be confusing Aston owners with Ferrari ones, Aston owners wear their badge on the inside and headline figures aren't normally their thing wink

Obviously there will be exceptions, especially on PH, but in the main and from experience, headline figures and getting one up on the Jones' are not what owners look for.

silverspeed

859 posts

99 months

[news] 
Wednesday 20th June 2012 quote quote all
Rex Racer said:
Speaking of power, I'm surprised there isn't more discussion here on the expected specs of this car. Personally, I'm disappointed that the car doesn't have more power -- it only has about 50 bhp more than its successor had nearly 10 years ago, and a lot has changed in the sports car world since then. I'm sure that Aston could have mustered at least 600 bhp. BR certainly could have. Yes, it's only a number and yes we're talking about a street car, but IMO Aston needed to provide more for its flagship car, especially when it's an "all new" Vanquish instead of just a refresh of the DBS (which I think it actually is).
Vanquish S = 600bhp IMO. Give it 2/3 years and it will arrive

t1blk

743 posts

49 months

[news] 
Wednesday 20th June 2012 quote quote all
KarlFranz said:
I'll wait for the manual gearbox version with clear taillights to be available before I buy.
Lucky you, I'll have to wait until my lottery ticket numbers come up.
Personally I love everything about the new Vanquish, it looks gorgeous and I WANT ONE

GerryS

80 posts

23 months

[news] 
Wednesday 20th June 2012 quote quote all
I do like the look of that cool

North West Tom

9,427 posts

46 months

[news] 
Wednesday 20th June 2012 quote quote all
Just me who thinks the boot panel gap is a bit on the larger side?

Adam2S

1,067 posts

46 months

[news] 
Wednesday 20th June 2012 quote quote all
As a V12V owner Im wondering if there will soon be a performance pack published to add in those additional 55 horses!

Rex Racer

340 posts

23 months

[news] 
Wednesday 20th June 2012 quote quote all
silverspeed said:
Vanquish S = 600bhp IMO. Give it 2/3 years and it will arrive
You may be right, but that's a little too little, a little too late IMO. I wish it would have been Vanquish = 600 bhp, and Vanquish S = 650 bhp in 2-3 years.

michael gould

3,217 posts

110 months

[news] 
Wednesday 20th June 2012 quote quote all
t1blk said:
KarlFranz said:
I'll wait for the manual gearbox version with clear taillights to be available before I buy.
Lucky you, I'll have to wait until my lottery ticket numbers come up.
Personally I love everything about the new Vanquish, it looks gorgeous and I WANT ONE
Im with you on this ......i love it......also agree about the headline figures....... the bloody thing gets to 62 MPH in 4.2 sec......who gives a toss about a Porsche 911 Turbo doing it in 3.6 sec .....its not an Aston

sadlerj

818 posts

153 months

[news] 
Wednesday 20th June 2012 quote quote all
Perfection...I love it...you can tell in the flesh she is going to look fantastic.
1
3 4 ... 9 10
Reply to Topic