Pics of clear side marker lights/rear reflectors installed

Pics of clear side marker lights/rear reflectors installed

Author
Discussion

mikey k

13,012 posts

217 months

Saturday 24th August 2013
quotequote all
Lunablack said:
$100 bucks for a piece of plastic that not only doesn't work, but is illegal..hehe

Bargain...
yes nice idea but at money
As they say I'm out!

Edited by mikey k on Sunday 25th August 11:32

Black9

585 posts

177 months

Sunday 25th August 2013
quotequote all
Lunablack said:
$100 bucks for a piece of plastic that not only doesn't work, but is illegal..hehe

Bargain...
Ahh the good old "Aston Tax"!

snuffy

9,864 posts

285 months

Sunday 25th August 2013
quotequote all
We have laws that govern things on cars like lights, number plates, reflectors and various other things. And 99.999% of car owners abide by those laws, so why is it that a tiny few think those regulations don't apply to them ?

Lunablack

3,494 posts

163 months

Sunday 25th August 2013
quotequote all
snuffy said:
We have laws that govern things on cars like lights, number plates, reflectors and various other things. And 99.999% of car owners abide by those laws, so why is it that a tiny few think those regulations don't apply to them ?
I take it you never go over the speed limit??

snuffy

9,864 posts

285 months

Sunday 25th August 2013
quotequote all
Lunablack said:
snuffy said:
We have laws that govern things on cars like lights, number plates, reflectors and various other things. And 99.999% of car owners abide by those laws, so why is it that a tiny few think those regulations don't apply to them ?
I take it you never go over the speed limit??
Since you said they were illegal then can I take it that you never exceed the speed limit either ?

Further, since almost everyone exceeds the speed limit at some time or other then it can be inferred that the majority of drivers don't always agree with the law (and laws are next to useless if the citizens of a country don't agree with them). But when it comes to the examples I gave (number plates, lights etc) then the vast majority of motorists do abide by them because a) they agree with them and b) there is nothing whatsoever to be gained by not doing so.

Edited by snuffy on Sunday 25th August 12:17

Neil1300R

5,487 posts

179 months

Sunday 25th August 2013
quotequote all
snuffy said:
Since you said they were illegal then can I take it that you never exceed the speed limit either ?

Further, since almost everyone exceeds the speed limit at some time or other then it can be inferred that the majority of drivers don't always agree with the law (and laws are next to useless if the citizens of a country don't agree with them). But when it comes to the examples I gave (number plates, lights etc) then the vast majority of motorists do abide by them because a) they agree with them and b) there is nothing whatsoever to be gained by not doing so.

Edited by snuffy on Sunday 25th August 12:17
Most motorbikes have illegal sized numberplates. Most have noisy (illegal?) exhausts. A lot have no rear refector as the rear lights are aftermarket.
Most bike owners don't agree with the laws so choose to ignore them. But, know they are illegal.

Not sure what your point is? Changing tiny red reflectors for tiny white reflectors does not make the cars invisible, its just stupid laws harking back to the days of cars having crap electrics and lights. You can buy stick on red reflectors costing ~ 3 quid for MoT time.

Lunablack

3,494 posts

163 months

Sunday 25th August 2013
quotequote all
snuffy said:
Since you said they were illegal then can I take it that you never exceed the speed limit either ?
I'm not the one questioning "why" some folk break the law.... I merely stated that they're illegal...

As for me.... I choose for myself which laws I abide by....... Or not, as the case may be.smile

KarlFranz

2,008 posts

271 months

Sunday 25th August 2013
quotequote all
European headlamps labeled as "E-Code" are illegal in the US and have to be sold here with a big warning saying they are for "off-road use only". The sad part is that these lamps are much better and brighter than the standard US DOT-approved lamps and provide much better visibility for the driver. The only reason they are considered illegal is because they don't include a couple of little nubs molded into the glass lens that are used to attach a piece of equipment to properly aim the beam so as to not blind oncoming traffic. Of course there are other ways to properly aim the beam and this is usually documented in the owner's manual of the car.

So this is one "law" that I chose to violate on my Esprit because I figure improved night visibility (for aging eyes) is more important than abiding by some ridiculous rule.

BTW I suspect the reason for the rule on having red reflectors on the back of the car is so you can see a car that is parked on the side if the road from a longer distance. I guess the red color is so you know that the car is facing the same direction of travel? If visibility is the main concern for the regulation, what difference does the color of the reflector make?