DB4 GT Continuation

DB4 GT Continuation

Author
Discussion

stevewak

497 posts

130 months

Friday 9th December 2016
quotequote all
stevewak said:
Got there in the end.

ajr550

Original Poster:

489 posts

124 months

Friday 9th December 2016
quotequote all
ajr550 said:
Call me cynical but having just picked up the latest edition of Vantage,the "independent" AM magzine which is stuffed full of DB4GTs I am now convinced that the Continuation will happen.
Guess what ? Latest version of Vantage names DB4 GT greatest Aston Martin drivers car ever.What a coincidence !!

hornbaek

3,675 posts

235 months

Saturday 10th December 2016
quotequote all
ajr550 said:
Guess what ? Latest version of Vantage names DB4 GT greatest Aston Martin drivers car ever.What a coincidence !!
And it is and long may it continue. Building continuation models is a farce. Image you turn up at Goodwood Revival with your original GT and you have to drive against these continuation models. It clearly dilutes the experience and I hope Lord March is going to ban them from events such as the Revival.

They do it because they can and because some people will pay money for that - you just wonder why ?

LordBretSinclair

4,288 posts

177 months

Saturday 10th December 2016
quotequote all
hornbaek said:
And it is and long may it continue. Building continuation models is a farce. Image you turn up at Goodwood Revival with your original GT and you have to drive against these continuation models. It clearly dilutes the experience and I hope Lord March is going to ban them from events such as the Revival.
He banned the recreation Jags so I would imagine he would have the same (and IMHO correct) view about these continuation models.

Y100

2,036 posts

167 months

Saturday 10th December 2016
quotequote all
LordBretSinclair said:
He banned the recreation Jags so I would imagine he would have the same (and IMHO correct) view about these continuation models.
My own view is that going forward, perhaps there will be specific races for 'recreation' cars only. scratchchin

RichB

51,568 posts

284 months

Saturday 10th December 2016
quotequote all
Y100 said:
LordBretSinclair said:
He banned the recreation Jags so I would imagine he would have the same (and IMHO correct) view about these continuation models.
My own view is that going forward, perhaps there will be specific races for 'recreation' cars only. scratchchin
Personally I hope not, but I imagine you're right and in 10 years time we will be watching replicas/recreations and to me that's a shame.

Edited by RichB on Saturday 10th December 12:23

RobDown

3,803 posts

128 months

Saturday 10th December 2016
quotequote all
I'm just a little bemused by the whole thing

These are not going to be cheap. AM Works charges GBP400-500k) to do a full restoration of a car (by which they mean they essentially throw everything away and pretty much build a new one). So I'm guessing you won't get change from a GBP1m in buying one of these (and might conceivably be a fair bit more)

So a million to buy a car with no history, no heritage and you can't use it on the road? I'm really genuinely struggling to see how much demand there will be; if you had the sort of money to be able to blow a GBP1m on a non-road legal DB4GT recreation, I'm guessing you can afford to buy the original.

And if you want a "fake" DB4GT, why not buy a DB4 and get a conversion? That would be cheaper, frankly more genuine than a modern recreation AND most importantly road-legal!

The only positive in all this I can see is that it helps pay to keep the old skills alive at Works (which is to be applauded)


jonby

5,357 posts

157 months

Saturday 10th December 2016
quotequote all
RobDown said:
I'm just a little bemused by the whole thing

These are not going to be cheap. AM Works charges GBP400-500k) to do a full restoration of a car (by which they mean they essentially throw everything away and pretty much build a new one). So I'm guessing you won't get change from a GBP1m in buying one of these (and might conceivably be a fair bit more)

So a million to buy a car with no history, no heritage and you can't use it on the road? I'm really genuinely struggling to see how much demand there will be; if you had the sort of money to be able to blow a GBP1m on a non-road legal DB4GT recreation, I'm guessing you can afford to buy the original.

And if you want a "fake" DB4GT, why not buy a DB4 and get a conversion? That would be cheaper, frankly more genuine than a modern recreation AND most importantly road-legal!

The only positive in all this I can see is that it helps pay to keep the old skills alive at Works (which is to be applauded)

I think I read £1.5M

Suspect this is partly aimed at those who buy am RB001 for £2.5M, Vulcan for £1.8M, Vanquish Zag for £500k, a Taraf for similar money, etc - in that context, it's just another expensive toy as part of the collection. I heard a rumour that those ordering a Taraf (which surely hasn't sold many ?) would be 'looked on favourably' if wanting an RB001 - I wonder if that applies with this project too - buy a DB4GT if you want a track only RB001 ? (they are building 25 of each)


RobDown

3,803 posts

128 months

Saturday 10th December 2016
quotequote all
Could be, I think the rb-001 invitations for the Monaco yacht launch were for Vulcan etc buyers

But if you have rb-001 money to blow why not buy an original? They're rare but do come up periodically (acquaintance sold his a while back as he wasn't driving it)

RichB

51,568 posts

284 months

Saturday 10th December 2016
quotequote all
RobDown said:
These are not going to be cheap. AM Works charges GBP400-500k) to do a full restoration of a car (by which they mean they essentially throw everything away and pretty much build a new one). So I'm guessing you won't get change from a GBP1m in buying one of these (and might conceivably be a fair bit more)
In another article it quotes £1.5m - I'll see if I can find it and post a link.

http://www.autocar.co.uk/car-news/new-cars/aston-m...

Edited by RichB on Saturday 10th December 13:22

RobDown

3,803 posts

128 months

Saturday 10th December 2016
quotequote all
Thanks rich

Jon39

12,826 posts

143 months

Saturday 10th December 2016
quotequote all
LordBretSinclair said:
He [Lord March] banned the recreation Jags so I would imagine he would have the same (and IMHO correct) view about these continuation models.


I understand that his philosophy for the Revival meeting, is only to allow cars that were actually built before 2 July 1966. That was the date the Goodwood circuit closed.

Whilst the meeting continues to be so oversubscribed, there seems no need to relax that rule.




Presumably AML have established the demand and perhaps already taken deposits, because it was some time ago that this proposal was first mentioned.



RobDown

3,803 posts

128 months

Saturday 10th December 2016
quotequote all
Andy Palmer has confirmed they're sold. But I'm still bemused by the whole continuation thing. But each to his own

V8 Vantage GT

1,569 posts

106 months

Saturday 10th December 2016
quotequote all
I believe this is pure genius. This is pocket change to the buyers of these cars which will no doubt only increase in value. A great way for Aston to make much needed cash not to mention publicity. Only down side is you can't legally drive on the road no doubt due to current safety regulations.

Y100

2,036 posts

167 months

Saturday 10th December 2016
quotequote all
RichB said:
Y100 said:
LordBretSinclair said:
He banned the recreation Jags so I would imagine he would have the same (and IMHO correct) view about these continuation models.
My own view is that going forward, perhaps there will be specific races for 'recreation' cars only. scratchchin
Personally I hope not, but I imagine you're right and in 10 years time we will be watching replicas/recreations and to me that's a shame.

Edited by RichB on Saturday 10th December 12:23
Reference the Revival cars that we see race; I do wonder if its not an inevitibility of time Rich that eventually the true originals by necessity have had most parts bar the chassis plates renewed. We see it in historic aircraft all the time, parts borrowed from scrapped aircraft of the period, sometimes from other types,,,main spars changed for new ones, engines rebuilt with newly manufactured parts, skin sections replaced, the list goes on.

As our precious original Aston DBR1's (only 5 ever made) have aged, fewer are seen out on track competing, their values prohibitive, one by one they are going into private collections after which they are rarely seen. As you feel I do too, watching those and the other pre 66 marques out on the circuit is just heaven BUT, no matter how much we would love them to continue, they can't go on for ever,,,unlike you and I of course.hehe

RichB

51,568 posts

284 months

Saturday 10th December 2016
quotequote all
Y100 said:
Reference the Revival cars that we see race <big clip> they can't go on for ever,,, unlike you and I of course. hehe
Indeed and yet we see the Bentley boys and the pre-war Aston chaps thrashing their pre-war machinery around the track with no longevity problems.

Jon39

12,826 posts

143 months

Saturday 10th December 2016
quotequote all

How far will this nostalgia go?

I wonder if AML might make one of these for me?
The No.8 original is in the Beaulieu motor museum.






williamp

19,256 posts

273 months

Saturday 10th December 2016
quotequote all
Jon39 said:
How far will this nostalgia go?

I wonder if AML might make one of these for me?
The No.8 original is in the Beaulieu motor museum.

Only if they use all the old names: Bunny, Razorbalde, greenpea and what was the other one?? N-something...

Jon39

12,826 posts

143 months

Saturday 10th December 2016
quotequote all

williamp said:
.. and what was the other one?? N-something...
Got it.




RichB

51,568 posts

284 months

Saturday 10th December 2016
quotequote all
williamp said:
Only if they use all the old names: Bunny, Razorbalde, greenpea and what was the other one?? N-something...
Coal Scuttle, that was black...