How much is too much for a CAT D repaired MX-5?

How much is too much for a CAT D repaired MX-5?

Author
Discussion

Eldog

Original Poster:

11 posts

87 months

Monday 20th February 2017
quotequote all
I was just wondering what sort of price you think is acceptable to pay for a 2004 Mazda MX-5 1.6 that has been repaired after previously being a CAT D needing panel / bodywork repairs.

Mileage is 110K. Rust Free

Any input is welcome!

Thanks

Edited by Eldog on Monday 20th February 10:22

Trabi601

4,865 posts

95 months

Monday 20th February 2017
quotequote all
I wouldn't bother - the Mk2 1.6 is far too underpowered to be worth buying, especially as a CatD.

Eldog

Original Poster:

11 posts

87 months

Monday 20th February 2017
quotequote all
Trabi601 said:
I wouldn't bother - the Mk2 1.6 is far too underpowered to be worth buying, especially as a CatD.
Thanks, I was thinking it may be okay to drive round for a daily for a little while then sell on and break even / maybe profit slightly if I can get it from a friend for let's say £250-300?

MX-5 Lazza

7,952 posts

219 months

Monday 20th February 2017
quotequote all
1.6 Mk2 engine is 110bhp so not too slow. Not quick but neither is 1.8.

lucido grigio

44,044 posts

163 months

Monday 20th February 2017
quotequote all
Eldog said:
Trabi601 said:
I wouldn't bother - the Mk2 1.6 is far too underpowered to be worth buying, especially as a CatD.
Thanks, I was thinking it may be okay to drive round for a daily for a little while then sell on and break even / maybe profit slightly if I can get it from a friend for let's say £250-300?
If you can get it for so little ^^^ then what can possibly go wrong ?

Trabi601

4,865 posts

95 months

Monday 20th February 2017
quotequote all
MX-5 Lazza said:
1.6 Mk2 engine is 110bhp so not too slow. Not quick but neither is 1.8.
The 1.8 feels wheezy and underpowered in a Mk1, 110bhp in a Mk2 isn't going to feel good at all - and it's not like the MX5 lump is a good engine, either - they just sound awful when pressed.

But... for the money the OP is talking about, it's not a bad shed.

MX-5 Lazza

7,952 posts

219 months

Monday 20th February 2017
quotequote all
Trabi601 said:
MX-5 Lazza said:
1.6 Mk2 engine is 110bhp so not too slow. Not quick but neither is 1.8.
The 1.8 feels wheezy and underpowered in a Mk1, 110bhp in a Mk2 isn't going to feel good at all - and it's not like the MX5 lump is a good engine, either - they just sound awful when pressed.

But... for the money the OP is talking about, it's not a bad shed.
I guess you haven't driven one then. The 1.6 is basically the same engine as in the early Mk1 and is a more eager feeling engine than the 1.8 which feels torquier but not really that much quicker. There isn't really a lot in it and for a 1.8 to lose a 1.6 it has to be driven very hard.

lilwashu

245 posts

165 months

Monday 20th February 2017
quotequote all
Trabi601 said:
The 1.8 feels wheezy and underpowered in a Mk1, 110bhp in a Mk2 isn't going to feel good at all - and it's not like the MX5 lump is a good engine, either - they just sound awful when pressed.

But... for the money the OP is talking about, it's not a bad shed.
Actually the 1.6 in the Mk2 is a very good pairing.

Trabi601

4,865 posts

95 months

Monday 20th February 2017
quotequote all
MX-5 Lazza said:
I guess you haven't driven one then. The 1.6 is basically the same engine as in the early Mk1 and is a more eager feeling engine than the 1.8 which feels torquier but not really that much quicker. There isn't really a lot in it and for a 1.8 to lose a 1.6 it has to be driven very hard.
  • shrugs*
Had an MX5 for a few years. Thought they were massively over-hyped. By any measure, the 1.6 is slow - I have a 2 tonne van that hits 60 over a second faster.

Gad-Westy

14,552 posts

213 months

Tuesday 21st February 2017
quotequote all
For that sort of money, if it runs, it's well worth it. What else can you buy for £300? More or less nothing roadworthy.

Gad-Westy

14,552 posts

213 months

Tuesday 21st February 2017
quotequote all
Trabi601 said:
  • shrugs*
Had an MX5 for a few years. Thought they were massively over-hyped. By any measure, the 1.6 is slow - I have a 2 tonne van that hits 60 over a second faster.
Well you certainly don't buy a 1.6 Mx5 to win drag races, sure. But I bet the 2 tonne van isn't much fun on a warm sunny evening down a twisty road.

griffdude

1,823 posts

248 months

Thursday 23rd February 2017
quotequote all
£300 for a repaired but catD MX5? Bargain. Chuck a cheap turbo kit on it & hours of fun. The only thing to look for on a MK2.5 is rot on the front chassis legs but as you say it's rust free, do it!

Furyblade_Lee

4,107 posts

224 months

Thursday 23rd February 2017
quotequote all
Trabi601 said:
MX-5 Lazza said:
1.6 Mk2 engine is 110bhp so not too slow. Not quick but neither is 1.8.
The 1.8 feels wheezy and underpowered in a Mk1, 110bhp in a Mk2 isn't going to feel good at all - and it's not like the MX5 lump is a good engine, either - they just sound awful when pressed.




rofl

drgoatboy

1,623 posts

207 months

Friday 24th February 2017
quotequote all
Eldog said:
Thanks, I was thinking it may be okay to drive round for a daily for a little while then sell on and break even / maybe profit slightly if I can get it from a friend for let's say £250-300?
Its worth more than that in parts! Just buy it and drive it smile