Saab 9-3 VS BMW 3 series

Saab 9-3 VS BMW 3 series

Author
Discussion

Nigel78

Original Poster:

2 posts

112 months

Tuesday 16th December 2014
quotequote all
Hi everyone,

Can you advice me what car is better in terms of reliability, performance, maintenance. My favorite choices are:

Saab 9-3 2.0 Turbo petrol engine
www.carmaniac.co.uk/overview/saab-9-3-2007-2011-id...

BMW 3 series 2.5 non turbo engine
http://www.carmaniac.co.uk/cars/bmw-3-klase-2005-2...

Will be grateful for your advice!

Nigel

Martyn76

629 posts

117 months

Monday 22nd December 2014
quotequote all
Hi,

Not petrol but my dad went from a 08 9-3 TTID to a 09 E90 330D after driving my 06 E91 330D, said it was a much nicer drive and was more comfortable too even though it has RFTs.

Can't expand much on reliability, the 9-3 never gave him any real problems in the 3 years or so that he had it and any issues he did have were covered by his SAAB warranty.

Edited by Martyn76 on Tuesday 23 December 10:57

5to1

1,781 posts

233 months

Monday 22nd December 2014
quotequote all
To my eyes the 3's aged better, still looks like a contemporary model. Although the number of them floating around may be the reason behind that :/ Plus I've always liked BMW's so am likely biased.

E30M3SE

8,467 posts

196 months

Monday 22nd December 2014
quotequote all
No contest, the 3 is the better car in every way, except the Saab has a little more interior room.

roofer

5,136 posts

211 months

Tuesday 23rd December 2014
quotequote all
It's FWD v RWD, the Vectra uses the fronts, so off my list.

mike325112

1,070 posts

184 months

Tuesday 23rd December 2014
quotequote all
E30M3SE said:
No contest, the 3 is the better car in every way, except the Saab has a little more interior room.
This, with the addition that the Saab has one of the best climate control systems I've ever used - set it to temperature and I never had to touch it again.

I've had 2 9-3's and we've owned our E46 for about 6 years. I've generally found the beamer to be a much nice place to be and generally more reliable than the Saab's.


spats

838 posts

155 months

Tuesday 23rd December 2014
quotequote all
I don't have experience with the BMW, but the engine in that SAAB is also used in the GM cars. From what I've seen they are ok, seen plenty with high miles on them but like any engine they aren't fool proof. But being used in GM cars as well as Saab means parts shuold be easy to come by.

Shame as the older Saab turbo engines were amazing and not only reliable (2.3 sludging accepted) but the B204L 2ltr engines could be tuned and run HUGE turbos.

JNW1

7,773 posts

194 months

Tuesday 23rd December 2014
quotequote all
I think it's a real shame Saab no longer exists as at one time they offered a genuine alternative to the more mainstream German stuff. My uncle and cousins have had a number of them over the years and a former colleague had a 9-5 Aero which was actually quite an impressive motorway car (and also had some of the most comfortable seats I've ever sat in for a long journey). Sadly, though, they lost their way and in the end the 9-3 was little more than a re-bodied Vectra; I can remember having a drive in a 9-3 Aero and being seriously disappointed as the chassis was poor and the build quality only so-so. Therefore, to answer the OP's question, 3-Series all the way unless you've got a burning desire to be different....

bennyboydurham

1,617 posts

174 months

Sunday 28th December 2014
quotequote all
I had a 9-3 as a hire car in Ireland. Leaving aside the fact that it was ancient and wore a different brand of ditch finder at every corner, it was probably the worst car I've ever driven:

Leaden steering, fizzy gutless engine, appalling torque steer and build quality that would shame a BL product. My wife pulled the trim around the handbrake clean off and the stereo was embarrassingly tinny.

Avoid. At all costs.