30d vs 35d

Author
Discussion

hornetrider

63,161 posts

205 months

Sunday 24th May 2015
quotequote all
I doubt BMW will be piping in any diesel racket anytime soon, they're not complete masochists.

GTRmad

248 posts

171 months

Sunday 24th May 2015
quotequote all
AB said:
There's certainly not many cars on the road that can touch it in terms of pace and to still get 50+ mpg on a steady run, it's pretty impressive.
Except you won't get 50 mpg in a 335d more like low 30;s

AB

Original Poster:

16,975 posts

195 months

Monday 25th May 2015
quotequote all
I'm sure it'll be more than low 30's on a run mate.

I've seen high 30's in an X5 with the same engine!

AB

Original Poster:

16,975 posts

195 months

Thursday 28th May 2015
quotequote all
Someone sent me a sign and parked a 330d in Estoril Blue with Coral Red leather outside my house yesterday.

Order amended...

BMRuss

1,547 posts

190 months

Thursday 28th May 2015
quotequote all
GTRmad said:
Except you won't get 50 mpg in a 335d more like low 30;s
With a mixture of driving I get 37.8mpgs from my 335d x drive, would have to be really pressing hard to get low 30's.

335d

758 posts

118 months

Thursday 28th May 2015
quotequote all
BMRuss said:
With a mixture of driving I get 37.8mpgs from my 335d x drive, would have to be really pressing hard to get low 30's.
You would probably need to leave the handbrake on to see low 30s. Over a year and 16k miles I'm averaging just under 40mpg and I drive with some enthusiasm.

xDrive seems to be responsible for a reduction of perhaps 4mpg relative to sDrive, but there is virtually no difference between the 30d and 35d engines in terms of fuel economy in this car. The 35d is really a no-brainer for £30pm extra.

Fox-

13,233 posts

246 months

Thursday 28th May 2015
quotequote all
335d said:
You would probably need to leave the handbrake on to see low 30s. Over a year and 16k miles I'm averaging just under 40mpg and I drive with some enthusiasm.
It depends on your journey profile surely. I don't drive particularly hard but my lifetime average on my F10 30d is 34.7mpg.

anonymous-user

54 months

Thursday 28th May 2015
quotequote all
Fox- said:
335d said:
You would probably need to leave the handbrake on to see low 30s. Over a year and 16k miles I'm averaging just under 40mpg and I drive with some enthusiasm.
It depends on your journey profile surely. I don't drive particularly hard but my lifetime average on my F10 30d is 34.7mpg.
Well, I don't rush around but I keep up with the traffic and my F10 30D averages mid 40s with a 50/50 mix of around home and long runs.

Fox-

13,233 posts

246 months

Thursday 28th May 2015
quotequote all
REALIST123 said:
Well, I don't rush around but I keep up with the traffic and my F10 30D averages mid 40s with a 50/50 mix of around home and long runs.
Astonishing, the only time I average average 45mpg to a tank is when the vast majority of it is a long Motorway journey.

And I generally tend to sit at about 70ish on the Motorway, I don't fly everywhere really.

335d

758 posts

118 months

Friday 29th May 2015
quotequote all
Fox- said:
Astonishing, the only time I average average 45mpg to a tank is when the vast majority of it is a long Motorway journey.

And I generally tend to sit at about 70ish on the Motorway, I don't fly everywhere really.
That sounds very poor if yours is an sDrive 330d. If I sit at a steady 70mph on flattish motorway my 335d xDrive gets close to 50mpg. I would have expected you to get mid 50s for the motorway section.

The 330d xDrive seems to be no more efficient than the 335d xDrive, and some people seem to get worse economy from them, although it is hard to make a fair comparison.

The 330d sDrive and 330d xDrive engines are tuned differently from each other if you look at the official torque figures:

330d sDrive 560 Nm (2000-2750rpm)
330d xDrive 560 Nm (1500-3000rpm)

EDIT - sorry just spotted that your car is an F10, rather than an F30, so clearly sDrive. The economy figure does sound low though.

Edited by 335d on Friday 29th May 09:45

Wills2

22,765 posts

175 months

Friday 29th May 2015
quotequote all
I averaged 36 mpg in my f31 335d over 16,000 miles and 80% of those were on the motorway.


knitware

1,473 posts

193 months

Friday 29th May 2015
quotequote all
The anti-diesel comments are silly, it’s only a fuel and talking in an un-educated drivel way makes the posters sound like the dullard bloke down the pub that repeats himself and whom you desperately try to move away from. I know to those folk it’s complicated to read beyond ignorant biased views but the whole point of this thread focuses around choosing a 30d or 35d. If you want to add value to the topic please do but chatting crap about preferred fuel is bonkers, yes we get it, petrol is king, lovely, now please leave the room, ta.


I have the 330d SD sport automatic and with the PPK achieves 300 bhp, > 650 Nm of torque which is simply beautify and it’s a lovely quiet car. I carry two children and they manage to fall asleep in the back quite easily. The car is quiet and refined enough to have the radio on low and hold conversation with my wife. The controls are in reach, the seats are comfortable and if I’m on my own apparently the car will do a 0-60 in around 5 point something seconds, if I want to overtake then effortless torque will carry me safely passed in a blink.


Diesel cars, rattly, noisy horrid, slow things aren’t they…next time I’ll buy petrol, or electric, or hydrogen, bla bla bla

smashy

3,032 posts

158 months

Friday 29th May 2015
quotequote all
superb knitwear...Top gear meets BMWland and topgear gets a mauling...glad your about Knitwear ,you know the Turbo lag in comfort mode which disapears in sport mode , has the Performance Pack effected that lag in comfort?
Cheers mate

335d

758 posts

118 months

Friday 29th May 2015
quotequote all
knitware said:
I have the 330d SD sport automatic and with the PPK achieves 300 bhp, > 650 Nm of torque
I guess you are aware that the official PPK figures are somewhat lower (286hp and 600Nm) http://www.matlawrence.com/images/bmw/powerkit.pdf

Your suggested torque figure in particular sounds high to me. Rolling roads seem to give pretty optimistic numbers in my experience, perhaps as people tend to want to see high numbers and the customer gets what he wants wink

Wills2

22,765 posts

175 months

Friday 29th May 2015
quotequote all
I'm not sure there was any anti diesel talk on the thread apart from a couple of quips from one poster? Slightly bizarre rant to be honest.

hornetrider

63,161 posts

205 months

Friday 29th May 2015
quotequote all
Wills2 said:
I'm not sure there was any anti diesel talk on the thread apart from a couple of quips from one poster? Slightly bizarre rant to be honest.
yes

Still, smashy has found a mate.

smashy

3,032 posts

158 months

Friday 29th May 2015
quotequote all
hornetrider said:
yes

Still, smashy has found a mate.
so you post around 130 times a week on here?? ,the only mate you must have is the Pizza delivery man

knitware

1,473 posts

193 months

Friday 29th May 2015
quotequote all
smashy said:
superb knitwear...Top gear meets BMWland and topgear gets a mauling...glad your about Knitwear ,you know the Turbo lag in comfort mode which disapears in sport mode , has the Performance Pack effected that lag in comfort?
Cheers mate
Hi,

The PPK has altered the mapping and also the gearbox, it's subtle but noticeable and it affects all driving modes. For example in the comfort setting there is a change, it's as it was before the PPK when driving normally but when I go for an overtake the urgency of the gearbox and engine is instant, it's almost like it's switched to a sport setting if that makes sense. There's no need to move the gear stick to the left, overtakes can be made in comfort with no lag, it's a really good improvement.

With the gear lever left and the button in sport presented is a huge beautiful linear flow of torque and speed with each gear change nailed in at the top of the revs, it's super quick but there aren't many places and opportunities to drive like this too often, saved for a treat.

smashy

3,032 posts

158 months

Friday 29th May 2015
quotequote all
Cheers knitwear, Got you,basically ,maybe you could say they have moved comfort mode to somewhere between the old Comfort mode and Sport ,still man mathing this ,a BMW dealer offered me the PPK for £950 all in,with no brake upgrade

knitware

1,473 posts

193 months

Friday 29th May 2015
quotequote all
335d said:
I guess you are aware that the official PPK figures are somewhat lower (286hp and 600Nm) http://www.matlawrence.com/images/bmw/powerkit.pdf

Your suggested torque figure in particular sounds high to me. Rolling roads seem to give pretty optimistic numbers in my experience, perhaps as people tend to want to see high numbers and the customer gets what he wants wink
Hello, yes those figues are official and are for their brochure, I suppose it's like their official MPG figures, a 'bit off'.

An example of a rolling road

pre PPK - 330d 285 bhp and 637 Nm
post PPK- 300d 303 bhp and 664 Nm

So I actually quoted modest figures. It actually 'feels' about right. I had a MB E500 (PETROL)! with 388 bhp but with the weight and torque differences the cars felt as quick as each other, give or take.

http://f30.bimmerpost.com/forums/showthread.php?t=...

http://f30.bimmerpost.com/forums/showpost.php?p=14...

The above figures are from one source but are not dissimilar to what other people are seeing.

Don't be too led by the figures either, the PPK although at a glance doesn't add too much HP but it seems to gel the whole car together more as a result of gearbox tweaks and other magic.

There is going to be a rolling road session soon with BMW 3 series F30/F31, 330d, 335d, 328i and 335i with each car being different, 330 with and without PPK etc so those results will be interesting.

OP,
330d or 335d, both great cars, I'm averaging around 41 mpg, BMW quote 56.5...

Edited by knitware on Friday 29th May 16:04