E61 V8 Bearding

E61 V8 Bearding

Author
Discussion

ATM

Original Poster:

18,300 posts

220 months

Tuesday 19th January 2016
quotequote all
hornetrider said:
Very, very sad to hear of all these automaton-oaptronic gearbox woes gentlemen.
Stop waving your big stick around man. No woes here. I just think after 10 years it might be time for some new fluid.

philmots

4,631 posts

261 months

Tuesday 19th January 2016
quotequote all
ATM said:
philmots said:
VerySideways said:
ATM said:
Surely you could get that reprogrammed into the earlier box?
No idea.
I had my full car updated inc gearbox with latest software, it was quite a bit different since, hardly any slush and nice crisp changes.
Who did this?

I think mine is due some tlc. Must be the original fluid.
I used a BMW Indy in Hessle, not really local but my more local place refused to do it because of the high chance of bricking the idrive..

They need to have Autologic, they use that to update and it pulls all the current files straight from BMW. The majority of the files that were updated were all to a 2015 file so they must release new versions fairly frequently.

It won't fix a broken gearbox but it will make yours behave more efficiently.


philmots

4,631 posts

261 months

Tuesday 19th January 2016
quotequote all
ATM said:
philmots said:
VerySideways said:
ATM said:
Surely you could get that reprogrammed into the earlier box?
No idea.
I had my full car updated inc gearbox with latest software, it was quite a bit different since, hardly any slush and nice crisp changes.
Who did this?

I think mine is due some tlc. Must be the original fluid.
I used a BMW Indy in Hessle, not really local but my more local place refused to do it because of the high chance of bricking the idrive..

They need to have Autologic, they use that to update and it pulls all the current files straight from BMW. The majority of the files that were updated were all to a 2015 file so they must release new versions fairly frequently.

It won't fix a broken gearbox but it will make yours behave more efficiently.


philmots

4,631 posts

261 months

Tuesday 19th January 2016
quotequote all
hornetrider said:
Very, very sad to hear of all these automaton-oaptronic gearbox woes gentlemen.
The previous owner of mine suffered the woes! I got the rebuilt gearbox... with a leaky sump, that I fixed!

I'd quite like a manual one as a second car for their rarity or to use on track like a mini M5... but I'd never swap mine for one, I just couldn't imagine to have to change gear in it! Gear changing in a barge,, euugghhhhh

dom9

8,090 posts

210 months

Tuesday 19th January 2016
quotequote all
philmots said:
Have you ever reset your proper adaptions? It's meant to be done after any gearbox work or fluid change.. I did mine after I had the fluid flushed and I literally couldn't belive the difference, like a new 'box!

It's got to be done through INPA, and it's not at all related to driving style etc, just wear on certain parts of internals etc.

I'm such a sad bd
I was told that they had checked the latest software and reset the 'box but who knows what that means!?

It always seemed odd that this problem showed up straight after the oil change. Could it just be adaptations do you think or is it definitely 'wear', any way you look at it?

Interestingly, it certainly seems better some days than others and is possibly getting better with time, which does suggest it may be readapting!?

Would I swap my auto dog carrier for a manual? Nope!

ATM

Original Poster:

18,300 posts

220 months

Thursday 21st January 2016
quotequote all



Edited by ATM on Thursday 13th September 21:23

hornetrider

63,161 posts

206 months

Thursday 21st January 2016
quotequote all
18s?

ATM

Original Poster:

18,300 posts

220 months

Thursday 21st January 2016
quotequote all
hornetrider said:
18s?
Front

BBS CH 015
18 x 8.5
et35

With a 25mm spacer so I'm effectively running a 10 offset.

245 40 18 Dunlop Winter Sport



Rear

BBS CH 018
18 x 10
et40

With a 15mm spacer - so et25.

265 35 18 Dunlop Winter Sport







Edited by ATM on Thursday 13th September 21:24

hornetrider

63,161 posts

206 months

Thursday 21st January 2016
quotequote all
It's probably just the picture but something looks a little off at the rear to me. Like it's too high?

ATM

Original Poster:

18,300 posts

220 months

Thursday 21st January 2016
quotequote all
hornetrider said:
It's probably just the picture but something looks a little off at the rear to me. Like it's too high?
As in the arch gap at rear?

hornetrider

63,161 posts

206 months

Thursday 21st January 2016
quotequote all
Yeah.

Jobbo

12,973 posts

265 months

Thursday 21st January 2016
quotequote all
The sidewall of the tyre looks a bit slim to me. That's a non-standard tyre size on an E61, I think, so perhaps going up to a 275/35 would make the difference.

ATM

Original Poster:

18,300 posts

220 months

Thursday 21st January 2016
quotequote all
Jobbo said:
The sidewall of the tyre looks a bit slim to me. That's a non-standard tyre size on an E61, I think, so perhaps going up to a 275/35 would make the difference.
It's not a massive difference in diameter between the two. Also dont forget the self leveling suspension. As the diameter is smaller then the suspension will raise to keep the car level. So the difference is doubled.

philmots

4,631 posts

261 months

Thursday 21st January 2016
quotequote all
Agree re rear arch gap..

On an 18" rim it should measure from the bottom of the wheel rim to the wheel arch 607mm

It's easy to recalibrate but your links are probably siezed at the ball joints which makes getting it perfect is impossible. If you're getting otherwise erratic readings it's most probably your solenoid.

Mine was up, then down, then up on one side etc etc, new solenoid fixed it. Then I realised the links were seized as I was struggling to get it accurate to the mm, all sorted when they were replaced.

ATM

Original Poster:

18,300 posts

220 months

Thursday 21st January 2016
quotequote all
I post a pic of my car and I'm told it's broke.

philmots

4,631 posts

261 months

Thursday 21st January 2016
quotequote all
Check it out or leave it how it is, I'm not bothered either way!

Only trying to help, the drive of mine was really compromised when the rear suspension wasn't working right. In that pic it looks not right, but it could be just the angle of the pic etc.

Btw, it looks good on those wheels!

ATM

Original Poster:

18,300 posts

220 months

Friday 22nd January 2016
quotequote all
philmots said:
On an 18" rim it should measure from the bottom of the wheel rim to the wheel arch 607mm
I'm confused by this. I thought the car levelled itself using something like a spirit level. If so the distance of rim to arch would not be constant.

Last night it looked lower at the back than it did in the earlier pic.

Jobbo

12,973 posts

265 months

Friday 22nd January 2016
quotequote all
It doesn't use a spirit level, it measures the height from part of the suspension to the body.

ATM

Original Poster:

18,300 posts

220 months

Friday 22nd January 2016
quotequote all
Jobbo said:
It doesn't use a spirit level, it measures the height from part of the suspension to the body.
That's disappointing - when I fit my much much bigger summer setup I was hoping the car would compensate accordingly.

Jobbo

12,973 posts

265 months

Friday 22nd January 2016
quotequote all
It does have sensors both front and rear (I guess that accommodates for the car being on less than level ground when it pumps the airbags up), so it would only be a problem if you had vastly different front/rear wheel and tyre diameters.