Login | Register
SearchMy Stuff
My ProfileMy PreferencesMy Mates RSS Feed
1 2 ... 131 132
134 135 ... 187 188
Reply to Topic
Author Discussion

Fox-

9,958 posts

115 months

[news] 
Sunday 15th January 2012 quote quote all
The bodykit is the standard one. The M5 and the Sport have the same bodykit from the factory, only the front grille insert and the rear bumper insert are different.

It only costs 60 quid to change the Sport front to the M5 front as its just the grille.

No way has 4k been spent on body parts, there is no need smile

Markyboy540i

13 posts

16 months

[news] 
Monday 16th January 2012 quote quote all
Its not just on the body parts but thanks for letting me know. I'l slap them.

Max M4X WW

1,860 posts

51 months

[news] 
Monday 16th January 2012 quote quote all
Is it an Auto?

Markyboy540i

13 posts

16 months

[news] 
Tuesday 17th January 2012 quote quote all
Max M4X WW said:
Is it an Auto?
Yeah, I think the manuals are pretty rare. I was looking at getting a 530i and the vast majority of those were auto's

Max M4X WW

1,860 posts

51 months

[news] 
Tuesday 17th January 2012 quote quote all
Yes probably one of the rarest e39 engine/gearbox combo's. Esp in facelift sport trim.
Advertisement

TrailingThrottle

10 posts

16 months

[news] 
Tuesday 17th January 2012 quote quote all
jamster1432 and Fox- I am liking your e39s, very much smile

I said goodbye to mine today, so this is a posthumous post. A 530d which the original owner had fully loaded with toys. I miss her already, and wonder if I will come to regard it as the best car I will ever own.

This picture from a cycling holiday in France...



Fox-

9,958 posts

115 months

[news] 
Tuesday 17th January 2012 quote quote all
Beautiful car. Very nice. A real shame you've sold it.

daemon

8,742 posts

66 months

[news] 
Tuesday 17th January 2012 quote quote all
Bought this last weekend, but my wife is going to buy it off me.

2000 330Ci. 129K miles with FSH. Has the shadowline gloss around windows which would have been rare at the time, but doesnt date the car as much as chrome might.

MV2's have been fitted at some point, and all the lenses have been upgraded to clear ones. The rear lights have been upgraded to the later LED (?) type off 2005 / 2006 cars.

Overall it hides its age well. The only other thing we're doing is changing the head unit to a CD player - got one today out of an 05 m3 for it.






Fox-

9,958 posts

115 months

[news] 
Tuesday 17th January 2012 quote quote all
You could take even more years off it by adding a Sport front/rear bumper to complete the look. I bet it'd look to Joe Public like it cost many times what it really did once you'd done that.

Clear lenses were standard on the front of a 330Ci, btw.

daemon

8,742 posts

66 months

[news] 
Tuesday 17th January 2012 quote quote all
Fox- said:
You could take even more years off it by adding a Sport front/rear bumper to complete the look. I bet it'd look to Joe Public like it cost many times what it really did once you'd done that.

Clear lenses were standard on the front of a 330Ci, btw.
Yeah, its worth considering doing.

The silver in the front bumper is a bit annoying, but not too noticable when its on the road.

If she decides to hold onto it medium / long term it would be worth upgrading them to sport ones.



Edited by daemon on Tuesday 17th January 22:10


Edited by daemon on Tuesday 17th January 22:10

AB

12,060 posts

64 months

[news] 
Wednesday 18th January 2012 quote quote all
Fox- said:
Are you sure they are the right wheels on the back? Why would you need spacers - we have a 3.0i in the family and with those wheels and it doesnt have spacers nor does it look like that!
100% certain they are the correct wheels on the back.

255/35/18 rear
225/40/18 front

Genuine BMW 108's

Maybe its the angle of the picture, I don't know.


Fox-

9,958 posts

115 months

[news] 
Wednesday 18th January 2012 quote quote all
I don't mean the tyre width I mean the physical wheel width.

AB

12,060 posts

64 months

[news] 
Wednesday 18th January 2012 quote quote all
Fox- said:
I don't mean the tyre width I mean the physical wheel width.
Well if the wheel was too small then the tyre wouldn't fit, so I don't really see where you're going with that?

They're genuine style 108 BBS manufactured alloy wheels.


Fox-

9,958 posts

115 months

[news] 
Wednesday 18th January 2012 quote quote all
That's not true, you can fit wider or narrower tyres to a rim.

mgmrw

20,951 posts

26 months

[news] 
Wednesday 18th January 2012 quote quote all
Fox- said:
That's not true, you can fit wider or narrower tyres to a rim.
nono

none of that "stretched and stanced" bks ranting

Fox-

9,958 posts

115 months

[news] 
Wednesday 18th January 2012 quote quote all
mgmrw said:
nono

none of that "stretched and stanced" bks ranting
I didn't say you should, only that its possible. His rear wheels look to be fronts with the rear size tyres on.

AB

12,060 posts

64 months

[news] 
Wednesday 18th January 2012 quote quote all
Fox- said:
That's not true, you can fit wider or narrower tyres to a rim.
I hardly think it's likely I've gone and put 255/35 rubber on a front wheel that I've mistakenly then put on the rear when it should be 225/40 and on the front...

I think it's fairly obvious it's the correct tyre.

Fox-

9,958 posts

115 months

[news] 
Wednesday 18th January 2012 quote quote all
So why does it look so out of place you thought you needed spacers?

mgmrw

20,951 posts

26 months

[news] 
Wednesday 18th January 2012 quote quote all
Fox- said:
I didn't say you should, only that its possible. His rear wheels look to be fronts with the rear size tyres on.
surely it's just the angle of the picture

Fox-

9,958 posts

115 months

[news] 
Wednesday 18th January 2012 quote quote all
mgmrw said:
surely it's just the angle of the picture
Not sure, but given that he says himself:

AB said:
I think I need some spacers, the wheels should not bury themselves in the arches like that!
Its not unreasonable to suggest reasons why he might have an issue. You don't need spacers for the correct size 108's, they should fit in the arch just fine and look fine.

So it's either totally fine in RL and the picture is just showing it as looking a bit weird due to the angle, or it's a front wheel by mistake, IMHO smile
1 2 ... 131 132
134 135 ... 187 188
Reply to Topic