New toy arrived - 520d

New toy arrived - 520d

Author
Discussion

Bernie-the-bolt

14,987 posts

250 months

Wednesday 23rd July 2008
quotequote all
dxb335d said:
Bernie-the-bolt said:
gizlaroc said:
[TW]Fox said:
Is it really worth putting up with a rattly 4 pot ruining the otherwise silky smooth 5 Series experience in return for just 38mpg?!
You can't tell it is a 4 pot when your driving it though, and if someone is getting 38 in a 520d they would only be getting 28 in one of the six cylinder cars.
Sorry to disagree gizlaroc, but over the last 28,000 miles I've averaged 34mpg in my 535D which is not that far below the 520.

And its been DMS'd....

And I drive like a there's no tomorrow (when I can)wink ....

Have you ever seen a 535D go past a 520, no competition really.
i cant see that you do drive like that.

A true representation of some one who does will get 18mpg out of a DMS'd x35d.

That person is me.
I do and it is that high!

My driving is a mixture of around London and long-ish runs which give a pretty good overall balance. 26,000 miles in year one from new and I was happy as a pig in ste having had a 4.8iS the previous year, run up 35,000 miles and had a major share option in Shell!

If you're only getting 18 out of your 335D are you sure it's OK? scratchchin

gizlaroc

17,251 posts

224 months

Wednesday 23rd July 2008
quotequote all
Bernie-the-bolt said:
gizlaroc said:
[TW]Fox said:
Is it really worth putting up with a rattly 4 pot ruining the otherwise silky smooth 5 Series experience in return for just 38mpg?!
You can't tell it is a 4 pot when your driving it though, and if someone is getting 38 in a 520d they would only be getting 28 in one of the six cylinder cars.
Sorry to disagree gizlaroc, but over the last 28,000 miles I've averaged 34mpg in my 535D which is not that far below the 520.

And its been DMS'd....

And I drive like a there's no tomorrow (when I can)wink ....

Have you ever seen a 535D go past a 520, no competition really.
I did 40k miles in my DMS'd 535d so I know what they are like, and if you are getting 34mpg in a 535d you would be getting near on 50mpg in a 520d, and that was my point.
Plus the 535d is still a big luxury barge, a lovely quick barge I agree, but somehow the powerdoesn't seem needed in that sort of car. The only time I used to think "What a fantastic car this is!!" is when going across Europe, on the German Autoroutes it made pefect sense, sat at 140mpg for 3 hours you can cross serious distances. But all in all it was a bit souless, I swapped for a 335i, around 2 mpg less, on a different level for performance and a lot more nimble. But still souless and a bit senseless for the UK.

520d/320d for every day and something fun for the weekend.wink

gizlaroc

17,251 posts

224 months

Wednesday 23rd July 2008
quotequote all
Just to add, not having a pop at anyones choice of car, just showing it from someone elses persective.

As a single car and for someone who doesn't care that new 535d's are loosing a grand a month at the moment then why not, but for a lot of people the 520d is the perfect run about, it never feels slow and it pays for itself in fuel consumption and depreciation over a bigger car.

We're all different. thumbup

dxb335d

2,905 posts

195 months

Wednesday 23rd July 2008
quotequote all
Bernie-the-bolt said:
dxb335d said:
Bernie-the-bolt said:
gizlaroc said:
[TW]Fox said:
Is it really worth putting up with a rattly 4 pot ruining the otherwise silky smooth 5 Series experience in return for just 38mpg?!
You can't tell it is a 4 pot when your driving it though, and if someone is getting 38 in a 520d they would only be getting 28 in one of the six cylinder cars.
Sorry to disagree gizlaroc, but over the last 28,000 miles I've averaged 34mpg in my 535D which is not that far below the 520.

And its been DMS'd....

And I drive like a there's no tomorrow (when I can)wink ....

Have you ever seen a 535D go past a 520, no competition really.
i cant see that you do drive like that.

A true representation of some one who does will get 18mpg out of a DMS'd x35d.

That person is me.
I do and it is that high!

My driving is a mixture of around London and long-ish runs which give a pretty good overall balance. 26,000 miles in year one from new and I was happy as a pig in ste having had a 4.8iS the previous year, run up 35,000 miles and had a major share option in Shell!

If you're only getting 18 out of your 335D are you sure it's OK? scratchchin
Nothing wrong with her. I have seen 42mpg when i re-set the thingy on a 7 mile stretch of dual carraigeway driving with 1/4 throttle.

My general driving, i get 18mpg. At the moment its on 23.

Bernie-the-bolt

14,987 posts

250 months

Wednesday 23rd July 2008
quotequote all
dxb335d said:
Bernie-the-bolt said:
dxb335d said:
Bernie-the-bolt said:
gizlaroc said:
[TW]Fox said:
Is it really worth putting up with a rattly 4 pot ruining the otherwise silky smooth 5 Series experience in return for just 38mpg?!
You can't tell it is a 4 pot when your driving it though, and if someone is getting 38 in a 520d they would only be getting 28 in one of the six cylinder cars.
Sorry to disagree gizlaroc, but over the last 28,000 miles I've averaged 34mpg in my 535D which is not that far below the 520.

And its been DMS'd....

And I drive like a there's no tomorrow (when I can)wink ....

Have you ever seen a 535D go past a 520, no competition really.
i cant see that you do drive like that.

A true representation of some one who does will get 18mpg out of a DMS'd x35d.

That person is me.
I do and it is that high!

My driving is a mixture of around London and long-ish runs which give a pretty good overall balance. 26,000 miles in year one from new and I was happy as a pig in ste having had a 4.8iS the previous year, run up 35,000 miles and had a major share option in Shell!

If you're only getting 18 out of your 335D are you sure it's OK? scratchchin
Nothing wrong with her. I have seen 42mpg when i re-set the thingy on a 7 mile stretch of dual carraigeway driving with 1/4 throttle.

My general driving, i get 18mpg. At the moment its on 23.
Even hacking around London last week I managed 28mpg............

I'm not convinced your steed is OK if you're only getting 18 general, 23 currently.

dxb335d

2,905 posts

195 months

Wednesday 23rd July 2008
quotequote all
Bernie-the-bolt said:
dxb335d said:
Bernie-the-bolt said:
dxb335d said:
Bernie-the-bolt said:
gizlaroc said:
[TW]Fox said:
Is it really worth putting up with a rattly 4 pot ruining the otherwise silky smooth 5 Series experience in return for just 38mpg?!
You can't tell it is a 4 pot when your driving it though, and if someone is getting 38 in a 520d they would only be getting 28 in one of the six cylinder cars.
Sorry to disagree gizlaroc, but over the last 28,000 miles I've averaged 34mpg in my 535D which is not that far below the 520.

And its been DMS'd....

And I drive like a there's no tomorrow (when I can)wink ....

Have you ever seen a 535D go past a 520, no competition really.
i cant see that you do drive like that.

A true representation of some one who does will get 18mpg out of a DMS'd x35d.

That person is me.
I do and it is that high!

My driving is a mixture of around London and long-ish runs which give a pretty good overall balance. 26,000 miles in year one from new and I was happy as a pig in ste having had a 4.8iS the previous year, run up 35,000 miles and had a major share option in Shell!

If you're only getting 18 out of your 335D are you sure it's OK? scratchchin
Nothing wrong with her. I have seen 42mpg when i re-set the thingy on a 7 mile stretch of dual carraigeway driving with 1/4 throttle.

My general driving, i get 18mpg. At the moment its on 23.
Even hacking around London last week I managed 28mpg............

I'm not convinced your steed is OK if you're only getting 18 general, 23 currently.
what would be wrong with her?

She has performed fine on the rollers in april, went really well at Santa pod in feb and was immense on a trackday in may.

I am about to go and get fuel as im low. I will re-set it on the i-drive for the 8 mile trip and drive like a granny and see what i get. Will post back shortly

Bernie-the-bolt

14,987 posts

250 months

Wednesday 23rd July 2008
quotequote all
Not sure what could be wrong but the mpg seems way too low bearing in mind the 535 is a bigger probably slightly heavier car.

Mine is an LCI June 07 BTW.

dxb335d

2,905 posts

195 months

Wednesday 23rd July 2008
quotequote all
Bernie-the-bolt said:
Not sure what could be wrong but the mpg seems way too low bearing in mind the 535 is a bigger probably slightly heavier car.

Mine is an LCI June 07 BTW.
Hi Bernie, done said trip now. Was 7 miles each way not 8.

On the way, i drove like a right old fart, 1/4 throttle. Trying to keep the gauge on the dash under the speedo between 30-50mpg. There are 5 roundabouts i had to negotioate also.




Do you think there is somethign wrong with my car still?#



On the way home, i drove like i usually do



Now you see why mine is low, and the reason i dont think you drive your car as hard as you say you do.wink

After 3 miles it was down to 11mpg, but after that, the last 4 miles was stuck behind traffic so it improved.

AS you can see by the mileage, it was re-set both times. My car is a march 07 E92 3335d with DMS map. (roaded 344bhp)





Edited by dxb335d on Wednesday 23 July 14:54

pgilc1

35,829 posts

197 months

Wednesday 23rd July 2008
quotequote all
gizlaroc said:
Just to add, not having a pop at anyones choice of car, just showing it from someone elses persective.

As a single car and for someone who doesn't care that new 535d's are loosing a grand a month at the moment then why not, but for a lot of people the 520d is the perfect run about, it never feels slow and it pays for itself in fuel consumption and depreciation over a bigger car.

We're all different. thumbup
'new' 520d's arent much better - a friend of mine has a sept 07 520 M Sport, nice spec and colour, new £31K, hes been offered 18K by a BMW dealer for it. Another wouldnt even bid him.


gizlaroc

17,251 posts

224 months

Wednesday 23rd July 2008
quotequote all
Probably a saloon?? Hundreds of them for the dealers to buy on the BMW network.

Bernie-the-bolt

14,987 posts

250 months

Wednesday 23rd July 2008
quotequote all
dxb335d said:
Bernie-the-bolt said:
Not sure what could be wrong but the mpg seems way too low bearing in mind the 535 is a bigger probably slightly heavier car.

Mine is an LCI June 07 BTW.
Hi Bernie, done said trip now. Was 7 miles each way not 8.

On the way, i drove like a right old fart, 1/4 throttle. Trying to keep the gauge on the dash under the speedo between 30-50mpg. There are 5 roundabouts i had to negotioate also.




Do you think there is somethign wrong with my car still?#



On the way home, i drove like i usually do



Now you see why mine is low, and the reason i dont think you drive your car as hard as you say you do.wink

After 3 miles it was down to 11mpg, but after that, the last 4 miles was stuck behind traffic so it improved.

AS you can see by the mileage, it was re-set both times. My car is a march 07 E92 3335d with DMS map. (roaded 344bhp)





Edited by dxb335d on Wednesday 23 July 14:54
To be fair I could drive 4 miles to work having set the computer and get similar results, but over a reasonable day to day distance of spririted and normal driving mid thirties is where both cars are likely to be.

If you only ever drive 7 miles to and from work I'm not surprised you mpg is so low as the car hasn't even warmed up!

As mentioned, my average is over a huge mileage and that's why it's showing what it is.

dxb335d

2,905 posts

195 months

Wednesday 23rd July 2008
quotequote all
Bernie-the-bolt said:
dxb335d said:
Bernie-the-bolt said:
Not sure what could be wrong but the mpg seems way too low bearing in mind the 535 is a bigger probably slightly heavier car.

Mine is an LCI June 07 BTW.
Hi Bernie, done said trip now. Was 7 miles each way not 8.

On the way, i drove like a right old fart, 1/4 throttle. Trying to keep the gauge on the dash under the speedo between 30-50mpg. There are 5 roundabouts i had to negotioate also.




Do you think there is somethign wrong with my car still?#



On the way home, i drove like i usually do



Now you see why mine is low, and the reason i dont think you drive your car as hard as you say you do.wink

After 3 miles it was down to 11mpg, but after that, the last 4 miles was stuck behind traffic so it improved.

AS you can see by the mileage, it was re-set both times. My car is a march 07 E92 3335d with DMS map. (roaded 344bhp)





Edited by dxb335d on Wednesday 23 July 14:54
To be fair I could drive 4 miles to work having set the computer and get similar results, but over a reasonable day to day distance of spririted and normal driving mid thirties is where both cars are likely to be.

If you only ever drive 7 miles to and from work I'm not surprised you mpg is so low as the car hasn't even warmed up!

As mentioned, my average is over a huge mileage and that's why it's showing what it is.
Bernie, i dont use the car for work. Just as a toy.

I range from not using the car one day to doing few hundred the next. The car has over 40k now.

The obc stalk is registering 24 today actually. I do generally drive very hard.

carl_w

9,188 posts

258 months

Wednesday 23rd July 2008
quotequote all
dxb335d said:
Bernie, i dont use the car for work. Just as a toy.
You have a diesel as a toy? eek Why?

Bernie-the-bolt

14,987 posts

250 months

Wednesday 23rd July 2008
quotequote all
Maybe you should get a 535d then as it's as much fun and more frugalwink

dxb335d

2,905 posts

195 months

Wednesday 23rd July 2008
quotequote all
carl_w said:
dxb335d said:
Bernie, i dont use the car for work. Just as a toy.
You have a diesel as a toy? eek Why?
Because its a cracking car mate, Can mix it with M machinery, is great fun on track and a fast road car. Despite this site being full of diesel haters. I too aint fan of diesel but this one is a cracking bit of refined kit.


Bernie-the-bolt said:
Maybe you should get a 535d then as it's as much fun and more frugalwink
LOL

fun i much doubt, HAHA. Frugal no way not with me driving it.wink

Thorny

1,076 posts

210 months

Wednesday 23rd July 2008
quotequote all
dxb - do you not get frustrated on track with such a small rev range?


pgilc1

35,829 posts

197 months

Wednesday 23rd July 2008
quotequote all
carl_w said:
dxb335d said:
Bernie, i dont use the car for work. Just as a toy.
You have a diesel as a toy? eek Why?
You've never driven a remapped 35d car then have you? 0-60 5.5s, 500lb/ft torque, delimited to around 174MPH. Why would you want a petrol car?

pgilc1

35,829 posts

197 months

Wednesday 23rd July 2008
quotequote all
Thorny said:
dxb - do you not get frustrated on track with such a small rev range?
Why would that frustrate you? The torque is much lower down on a diesel, and with the twin turbos there is power turbo lag, just power, power and then more power.

Plus its an auto so all the powers there with non of this revving and gearchanging nonsense

Edited by pgilc1 on Wednesday 23 July 16:53

dxb335d

2,905 posts

195 months

Wednesday 23rd July 2008
quotequote all
Thorny said:
dxb - do you not get frustrated on track with such a small rev range?
Everyone said to me i would get frustrated. But i didnt, not once did the car feel breathless. The power does not tail off on these twin turbo diesels like other diesels. Pulls hard to the redline. Albeit only 5k, but then Only engines like the CSL etc rev to 8k anyhow, so not that fdar behind.

The torque IS UNBELIEVABLE on track, pulls like a train out of every corner. No hiccup in the power delivery. Every gear is eaten up by a another massive swell of torque.

I was quicker than a V8 Vantange, E36 M3 Track car, M3 csl (only just though), E46 M3. Even down the straights.

The steptronic box is well mated to the 335d. The car has paddles so you can choose gears for corners etc. First few laps i was trying to shift down to early, i needed to wait till the revs dropped a bit more before i could downshift.

Remember a Diesel has Won le-mans a few times now mate, also Seat are campaigning Diesels in the BTCC and are the fastest things down the straight.

Diesel is great for the track, the E92 chassis is very nuetral and I had no understeer even with that ''heavy'' diesel up front rolleyes

Edited by dxb335d on Wednesday 23 July 16:56

Bernie-the-bolt

14,987 posts

250 months

Wednesday 23rd July 2008
quotequote all
Thorny said:
dxb - do you not get frustrated on track with such a small rev range?
Forget the rev range and feel the torque!