Login | Register
SearchMy Stuff
My ProfileMy PreferencesMy Mates RSS Feed
1
3
Reply to Topic
Author Discussion

996 sps

5,654 posts

85 months

[news] 
Thursday 12th July 2012 quote quote all
CBR JGWRR said:
1.Warn or reprimand someone firmly.
2.Advise or urge (someone) earnestly.


smile
Ha ha, I knew but thank you.

PH = Education matters.

CBR JGWRR

5,079 posts

18 months

[news] 
Thursday 12th July 2012 quote quote all
996 sps said:
CBR JGWRR said:
1.Warn or reprimand someone firmly.
2.Advise or urge (someone) earnestly.


smile
Ha ha, I knew but thank you.

PH = Education matters.
laugh

telecat

6,225 posts

110 months

[news] 
Thursday 12th July 2012 quote quote all
Many years ago. That many that the car was a six month old Astra on an f plate prefix. I was sitting in a Jam waiting for traffic to move when a School kid ran into the rear offside door. Picked himself up and ran off. Kids in a hurry!!

moanthebairns

4,284 posts

67 months

[news] 
Thursday 12th July 2012 quote quote all
CBR JGWRR said:
996 sps said:
What's admonished mean?
1.Warn or reprimand someone firmly.
2.Advise or urge (someone) earnestly.


smile
for example if you were to use it in a sentence I think it would go along the line of,

If the OP has the utter most cheek to post such pretentious words making us all in BB feel rather thick I will be forced to admonish him. Yes it was me who admonished you I shall shout from the top of roof tops............. ive taken that to far getmecoat

CBR JGWRR

5,079 posts

18 months

[news] 
Thursday 12th July 2012 quote quote all
moanthebairns said:
CBR JGWRR said:
996 sps said:
What's admonished mean?
1.Warn or reprimand someone firmly.
2.Advise or urge (someone) earnestly.


smile
for example if you were to use it in a sentence I think it would go along the line of,

If the OP has the utter most cheek to post such pretentious words making us all in BB feel rather thick I will be forced to admonish him. Yes it was me who admonished you I shall shout from the top of roof tops............. ive taken that to far getmecoat
I plucked that straight from google...

smile
Advertisement

John D.

9,556 posts

78 months

[news] 
Thursday 12th July 2012 quote quote all
Waz1999 said:
No details exchanged; kid wanted to continue to school, witnesses including the lady who admonished me all seemed happy.
I doubt the kid was insured anyway.

13aines

626 posts

18 months

[news] 
Thursday 12th July 2012 quote quote all
I don't know about this fool, but I imagine I'd be too embarrassed to tell my parents about what a brainless idiot I was on the way home, almost getting myself and others hurt, so I think the chances of him telling them and you getting an injury claim against you are low... however, YMMV, he may think it was your fault, but I expect he knows he wasn't looking! smile

CC07 PEU

637 posts

73 months

[news] 
Thursday 12th July 2012 quote quote all
Same thing happened to me in London a few months back. I admonished the pedestrian for being a complete and utter dhead and then rode off. Nothing happened beyond that.

Wedg1e

22,699 posts

134 months

[news] 
Friday 13th July 2012 quote quote all
My kid brother bounced off the side of a car in Scarborough (I forget what sort of car, it was the early 70s so probably something by Sunbeam, Hillman, Wolseley, Austin, Simca, Wartburg, Morris or Humber biggrin) when he vaulted over a fence at a roundabout.

Can we sue someone? silly

Brother D

851 posts

45 months

[news] 
Friday 13th July 2012 quote quote all
Kid on a skateboard was skating across three lanes at the junction of a roundabout. I stopped pulling up to the roundabout, the inside two lanes were stationary due to cars on the roundabout, and he skated into the side of my car, rolled over the bonnet, no visible damage, to the car, slight graze on elbow. Anyway someone called an ambulance as he winded himself.

Anyway, I had to do a producer when the poilce turned up, no great shakes. I was informed I may be prosecuted for driving without due care and attention.

Told the insurers, filled out a form.

Came to renewal, insurer had paid out 10K in damages. For some kid skating across a roundabout and running into the side of me. Brilliant...

LoonR1

12,498 posts

46 months

[news] 
Friday 13th July 2012 quote quote all
Brother D said:
Kid on a skateboard was skating across three lanes at the junction of a roundabout. I stopped pulling up to the roundabout, the inside two lanes were stationary due to cars on the roundabout, and he skated into the side of my car, rolled over the bonnet, no visible damage, to the car, slight graze on elbow. Anyway someone called an ambulance as he winded himself.

Anyway, I had to do a producer when the poilce turned up, no great shakes. I was informed I may be prosecuted for driving without due care and attention.

Told the insurers, filled out a form.

Came to renewal, insurer had paid out 10K in damages. For some kid skating across a roundabout and running into the side of me. Brilliant...
Bullst.

Not a chance in hell that figure was paid.

Torquey

1,039 posts

97 months

[news] 
Friday 13th July 2012 quote quote all
I was once sitting in traffic when someone crossing the road behind the car caused a huge thump through the car.

It turns out this person had walked straight into the tow bar. Hence them limping the rest of the way across the road clucthing their shin.


MrKipling43

5,305 posts

85 months

[news] 
Friday 13th July 2012 quote quote all
LoonR1 said:
Bullst.

Not a chance in hell that figure was paid.
I don't buy that either. I was on a bus that crashed (driver tried to follow another bus over one of those retractable bollards, failed) dislocated my shoulder, well and truly knackered me. Ended my MTBing career, weeks off work and school. I got half that amount.

snowdude2910

584 posts

33 months

[news] 
Friday 13th July 2012 quote quote all
So is this definately the op's fault in the eyes kf the law? Surely if this was a car or another bike that hit him it wouldn't be as they've "pulled out" into him?

LoonR1

12,498 posts

46 months

[news] 
Friday 13th July 2012 quote quote all
snowdude2910 said:
So is this definately the op's fault in the eyes kf the law? Surely if this was a car or another bike that hit him it wouldn't be as they've "pulled out" into him?
1. There is an independent witness who believes that the OP was at fault

2. Courts tend to find in favour of pedestrians over vehicles

3. Courts tend to find in favour of children over adults.

The OP has nothing going for him in this instance.

Point 1 is key here, unless you think that independent witness accounts should be ignored from now on.

Hooli

21,222 posts

69 months

[news] 
Friday 13th July 2012 quote quote all
ShampooEfficient said:
Hooli said:
I once managed to do the same deliberately to a taxi driver, thing is I was driving a coach hehe saw him running across & looking the wrong way so I stopped, laughed & drove off after a lovely impact noise.
On a related note, a bus driver I know (ahem) once was pulling into a bus stop, and saw someone clambering onto the roof of the stop ready to try "bus surfing" - so at the last moment carried on another 40 ft, just in time to see the promising footballer plummet to earth. Satisfying.
heheclap

ZesPak

11,516 posts

65 months

[news] 
Friday 13th July 2012 quote quote all
ShampooEfficient said:
On a related note, a bus driver I know (ahem) once was pulling into a bus stop, and saw someone clambering onto the roof of the stop ready to try "bus surfing" - so at the last moment carried on another 40 ft, just in time to see the promising footballer plummet to earth. Satisfying.
Seems a waste, I'd let him get on and give him the ride of his life.

"bus surfing" = "natural selection"

snowdude2910

584 posts

33 months

[news] 
Friday 13th July 2012 quote quote all
LoonR1 said:
snowdude2910 said:
So is this definately the op's fault in the eyes kf the law? Surely if this was a car or another bike that hit him it wouldn't be as they've "pulled out" into him?
1. There is an independent witness who believes that the OP was at fault

2. Courts tend to find in favour of pedestrians over vehicles

3. Courts tend to find in favour of children over adults.

The OP has nothing going for him in this instance.

Point 1 is key here, unless you think that independent witness accounts should be ignored from now on.
I'm not saying they should be ignored and i was just asling a question, the witness' opinion should be ignored as she isn't an expert but if she describes it as the op then surely that would go in his favour regardless of her opinion although i doubt she'd describe it as he does. Would you consider him to be at fault from what he's described although i understand if it came to a claim it would be unlikely to go well for him.
(note i don't ride a bike i'm currently part way through my DAS and I don't claim to know for sure who is to blame hence why i was asking)

LoonR1

12,498 posts

46 months

[news] 
Friday 13th July 2012 quote quote all
snowdude2910 said:
I'm not saying they should be ignored and i was just asling a question, the witness' opinion should be ignored as she isn't an expert but if she describes it as the op then surely that would go in his favour regardless of her opinion although i doubt she'd describe it as he does. Would you consider him to be at fault from what he's described although i understand if it came to a claim it would be unlikely to go well for him.
(note i don't ride a bike i'm currently part way through my DAS and I don't claim to know for sure who is to blame hence why i was asking)
Not sure I understand your first point, on the one hand you're saying they shouldn't be ignored, then immediately say they should be ignored. confused

Independent witnesses are vital in accident scenarios. They have no axe to grind, or financial interest so are more likely to give a reasonable account of what actually happened (of course they can get it completely wrong sometimes).

My take on this would be if there were a claim for it to be 100% the OPs fault, purely as he's got an opposing witness and it's a child.

If it were an adult, then he might get a 70/30, as adults should know better.

Court's do like to find for claimants, especially if they are pedestrians and even more so if they are children. All three go against the OP here.

The outcome would be identical if the OP was in a car or a bus driver, or an HGV driver, rules don't differ much, if at all, depending on the vehicle.

pozi

789 posts

56 months

[news] 
Friday 13th July 2012 quote quote all
LoonR1 said:
My take on this would be if there were a claim for it to be 100% the OPs fault, purely as he's got an opposing witness and it's a child.

If it were an adult, then he might get a 70/30, as adults should know better.

Court's do like to find for claimants, especially if they are pedestrians and even more so if they are children. All three go against the OP here.

The outcome would be identical if the OP was in a car or a bus driver, or an HGV driver, rules don't differ much, if at all, depending on the vehicle.
Have I got this right, if I cross the road and walk into the side of a car/bike it would be considered their fault and I can claim for my injuries?

Or is it just because he was filtering only I am struggling to understand how if I was stupid enough to get myself run over I could blame someone else?

1
3
Reply to Topic