Skully

Author
Discussion

bass gt3

10,193 posts

233 months

Monday 18th August 2014
quotequote all
The real question is how many people have the ability to differentiate between their left and right eyes and deal with different information to each?
As a possible comparison flying a helicopter isn't overly difficult, whereas flying an AH64 is because of the ocular skills required.
Now using Google glass isn't going to be a life or death event sitting at your desk. But getting transfixed on the HUD or nav and loosing focus of the road/situation ahead could fk up your day double quick. Now add in a phone call you're having and you're no different from the average car driver but without the advantage of an NCAP rated box surrounding you.
Technology is great but I think this fixes a problem that actually doesn't exist.
why not fit a rear facing camera and screen to the bike that's also the nav screen and use an existing scala type arrangement for bluetooth music and phone if REALLY necessary. then you can use whatever helmet you like.
In fact, why doesn't someone make a mirror with a built in camera and screen so you have full rearward visibility? No need for a ste helmet then!
this, sorry to say is kak

Edited by bass gt3 on Monday 18th August 17:39

Liquid Knight

Original Poster:

15,754 posts

183 months

Monday 18th August 2014
quotequote all
ZesPak said:
Anyway, the truth is we don't know yet how well it'll perform. If it releases sub-$500, I'll be first on the list, as I can see it "improving" my life just like a smartphone did.
One with just the rear view camera hud and adjustable tinting visor would be good.

gwm

2,390 posts

144 months

Monday 18th August 2014
quotequote all
bass gt3 said:
The real question is how many people have the ability to differentiate between their left and right eyes and deal with different information to each?
This is a good point. Imagine you are driving along, Sat Nav has a direction and you focus on what it says. You as a result drift to the right focusing on something down to your right, look where you are going and all that. You don't have the inherent stability of a car.

Richyboy

3,739 posts

217 months

Monday 18th August 2014
quotequote all

creampuff

6,511 posts

143 months

Monday 18th August 2014
quotequote all
gwm said:
bass gt3 said:
The real question is how many people have the ability to differentiate between their left and right eyes and deal with different information to each?
This is a good point. Imagine you are driving along, Sat Nav has a direction and you focus on what it says. You as a result drift to the right focusing on something down to your right, look where you are going and all that. You don't have the inherent stability of a car.
I can't say I have any experience with a monocular display. However it is possible to look through a telescope or down a gunsight and get different information in both eyes and for your brain to make sense of it.

bass gt3

10,193 posts

233 months

Tuesday 19th August 2014
quotequote all
creampuff said:
gwm said:
bass gt3 said:
The real question is how many people have the ability to differentiate between their left and right eyes and deal with different information to each?
This is a good point. Imagine you are driving along, Sat Nav has a direction and you focus on what it says. You as a result drift to the right focusing on something down to your right, look where you are going and all that. You don't have the inherent stability of a car.
I can't say I have any experience with a monocular display. However it is possible to look through a telescope or down a gunsight and get different information in both eyes and for your brain to make sense of it.
I agree. I just wonder what happens when you add speed/motion into the equation. Then maybe low light or dark conditions so maybe there's a difference in lighting levels between theHud and the road ahead which causes a delay in refocussing andmaybe you're asking too much to deal with.
As said,i just don't see the need or point but that doesn't stop someone plugging a hole in the market that doesn't really exist.....

RizzoTheRat

25,162 posts

192 months

Tuesday 19th August 2014
quotequote all
With a proper HUD the image is projected in a way that it appears to some distance from you, so the eye doesn't need to refocus. I did some trials some years ago with goggles that had a screen in the corner to display an image from a camera and you had to refocus on that. No idea if Skully (or google glass for that matter) use a proper distance projected image or if you need to refocus on it. A proper HUD shouldn't be particularly distracting.

Still don't see the point in a rear facing camera in your helmet though.

bogie

16,382 posts

272 months

Wednesday 27th August 2014
quotequote all
If this helmet launches in the US market, I wonder how long it will be before someone has an accident whilst wearing it and blames something in the helmet for distracting them ? I guess the helmet will have an instruction guide that no-one reads complete with lengthy small print legal disclaimer....


ZesPak

24,427 posts

196 months

Wednesday 27th August 2014
quotequote all
bogie said:
If this helmet launches in the US market, I wonder how long it will be before someone has an accident whilst wearing it and blames something in the helmet for distracting them ? I guess the helmet will have an instruction guide that no-one reads complete with lengthy small print legal disclaimer....
yes

Same as the disclaimer most gps systems force on you, to tell you that you should still obey traffic rules no matter what the GPS instruct you.

On the other hand, this helmet does nothing that didn't exist before. You've had a rear view in the mirrors for ages, a speed readout on your bike, a GPS mounted on the bar, bluetooth/intercom helmet systems,...

RizzoTheRat said:
Still don't see the point in a rear facing camera in your helmet though.
I think if it's there, it's one of these things you're going to miss first time you don't have it (try riding a bicycle after 100s miles on the bike).
Mirrors on a lot of bikes are next to useless due to position, vibrations,...

On top of that, if they stick out they make the bike wider.
If I had this and it would work properly, I could think of a number of bikes that look a lot better without the mirrors. Yes, I know, you're probably obliged to have them, but if I got a working system in my helmet I wouldn't really care and wouldn't see a real reason to keep them.

Lee540

1,586 posts

144 months

Wednesday 27th August 2014
quotequote all
Dare2Fail said:
No import duties are due on safety helmets. That's why you can pick up a bargain by ordering Arai RX7s from abroad.
Where did you get this information?

Says different here..

http://www.dutycalculator.com/

Duty Website said:
Notes on duty & taxes rates and compliance
Motorcycle Helmet has an import duty rate of 2.7% and a VAT rate of 20% .

Carpie

1,111 posts

195 months

Sunday 31st August 2014
quotequote all
Can't help feeling that focusing on the idea that a phone call could distract your riding is missing the point somewhat.

The helmet gives you a blind spot free view of what's behind you - eliminating one of the biggest sources of danger present whilst riding a bike... If this tech was added to every helmet in the world overnight there would be lives saved every second.

If there wasn't an option to switch off phone calls and navi that would be a design flaw - but if we assume they've thought of that obvious fuction, then who wouldn't want to be instantly aware that the old biddy in the Micra just switched lanes and is now directly in your way should you wish to do the same?

The calls and navi are more of a feature it'd be odd not to have the option of using given they would be so easy to integrate into the tech. And whilst it may be distracting, when you're touring Europe being able to hit a button and have it direct you to the nearest fuel station would be less distracting than trying to remember directions or looking away to a navi mounted on the bike, shirley?

Apparently the HUD is distance set and tracks the eye so you don't need to refocus.

LoonR1

26,988 posts

177 months

Sunday 31st August 2014
quotequote all
Carpie said:
Can't help feeling that focusing on the idea that a phone call could distract your riding is missing the point somewhat.

The helmet gives you a blind spot free view of what's behind you - eliminating one of the biggest sources of danger present whilst riding a bike... If this tech was added to every helmet in the world overnight there would be lives saved every second.

If there wasn't an option to switch off phone calls and navi that would be a design flaw - but if we assume they've thought of that obvious fuction, then who wouldn't want to be instantly aware that the old biddy in the Micra just switched lanes and is now directly in your way should you wish to do the same?

The calls and navi are more of a feature it'd be odd not to have the option of using given they would be so easy to integrate into the tech. And whilst it may be distracting, when you're touring Europe being able to hit a button and have it direct you to the nearest fuel station would be less distracting than trying to remember directions or looking away to a navi mounted on the bike, shirley?

Apparently the HUD is distance set and tracks the eye so you don't need to refocus.
As well as the throwaway comment that you shouldn't be riding if an old dear in a Micra can keep pace with you, there is the serious point that you ought to be able to spot that anyway and deal with it. You have no divine right to be in a particular space on the road.

bass gt3

10,193 posts

233 months

Sunday 31st August 2014
quotequote all
LoonR1 said:
Carpie said:
Can't help feeling that focusing on the idea that a phone call could distract your riding is missing the point somewhat.

The helmet gives you a blind spot free view of what's behind you - eliminating one of the biggest sources of danger present whilst riding a bike... If this tech was added to every helmet in the world overnight there would be lives saved every second.

If there wasn't an option to switch off phone calls and navi that would be a design flaw - but if we assume they've thought of that obvious fuction, then who wouldn't want to be instantly aware that the old biddy in the Micra just switched lanes and is now directly in your way should you wish to do the same?

The calls and navi are more of a feature it'd be odd not to have the option of using given they would be so easy to integrate into the tech. And whilst it may be distracting, when you're touring Europe being able to hit a button and have it direct you to the nearest fuel station would be less distracting than trying to remember directions or looking away to a navi mounted on the bike, shirley?

Apparently the HUD is distance set and tracks the eye so you don't need to refocus.
As well as the throwaway comment that you shouldn't be riding if an old dear in a Micra can keep pace with you, there is the serious point that you ought to be able to spot that anyway and deal with it. You have no divine right to be in a particular space on the road.
I'm pretty sure that the greatest factors to Motorcyclists deaths or injuries isn't what's behind them but single vehicle accidents or junction/intersection collisions. Or can you substantiate your claim that lives would be saved every second?
One of the central tennents to riding well is spacial awareness and observation, and if you don't know what's around you while you're riding, especially in your 4 and 8 o'clock positions, you have no business being on a bike in the first place. Expecting some technology to make up for a basic lack of ability isn't going to fix the problem that you aren't safe in the first place.

Klippie

3,138 posts

145 months

Sunday 31st August 2014
quotequote all
HUD...if it came with a missile system to fire at dawdling bds I'am in.

Ellerslie

129 posts

156 months

Sunday 31st August 2014
quotequote all
I think it's awesome in principle.

I can't wait to try one.

Dare2Fail

3,808 posts

208 months

Sunday 31st August 2014
quotequote all
Lee540 said:
Dare2Fail said:
No import duties are due on safety helmets. That's why you can pick up a bargain by ordering Arai RX7s from abroad.
Where did you get this information?

Says different here..

http://www.dutycalculator.com/

Duty Website said:
Notes on duty & taxes rates and compliance
Motorcycle Helmet has an import duty rate of 2.7% and a VAT rate of 20% .
No idea where my original source came from, probably something I read years ago. That said, based on my (now clearly incorrect) understanding I had the vendor mark the box of the helmet I bought from the US a few months back as 'motorcycle helmet' and it didn't get picked up as being due any form of import duties.

Edit to add:

This seems to support my understanding but it all hinges on the helmet being officially approved.

http://www.parliament.uk/Templates/BriefingPapers/...

Edited by Dare2Fail on Sunday 31st August 17:11

Rawwr

22,722 posts

234 months

Sunday 31st August 2014
quotequote all
It also appears to weigh 1.8kg yikes