Would you like a bike with 300hp?

Would you like a bike with 300hp?

Poll: Would you like a bike with 300hp?

Total Members Polled: 132

Yes Please! - now I can be as fast as BN: 63%
No thanks! - My 125 is very economical: 37%
Author
Discussion

John D.

17,801 posts

209 months

Tuesday 30th September 2014
quotequote all
Prof Prolapse said:
fking right I want 300bhp.

How else am I supposed to compensate for my tiny penis and lack of skill?
Traction control and anti wheelie? wink

Joking aside, surely a bike that powerfull is going to need plenty of rider assists?

off_again

12,273 posts

234 months

Tuesday 30th September 2014
quotequote all
Do I want it? Hell yeah.

Do I need it? Na, not even close!

And to be honest, anything with that amount of power needs to come with ALL of the gizmos, gadgets and features it can. Anti-wheelie, ABS, TC etc etc. The daft thing is that its largely irrelevant in the way that the current crop of super cars are irrelevant. Too fast for the road, too expensive for the track and more of a pub bragging tool than anything else. Thats fine and I am not complaining, but given the budget, I would have one.

off_again

12,273 posts

234 months

Tuesday 30th September 2014
quotequote all
Do I want it? Hell yeah.

Do I need it? Na, not even close!

And to be honest, anything with that amount of power needs to come with ALL of the gizmos, gadgets and features it can. Anti-wheelie, ABS, TC etc etc. The daft thing is that its largely irrelevant in the way that the current crop of super cars are irrelevant. Too fast for the road, too expensive for the track and more of a pub bragging tool than anything else. Thats fine and I am not complaining, but given the budget, I would have one.

CBR JGWRR

6,531 posts

149 months

Tuesday 30th September 2014
quotequote all
It will only go as fast as you tell it to go.

LeftmostAardvark

1,434 posts

164 months

Tuesday 30th September 2014
quotequote all
black-k1 said:
For me it would be pointless. I so rarely use the 170bhp I already have.

What I would like is a 125ftlb flat torque curve (line?) biggrin
That'll be a 103ci Harley with a stage 1 and a cam then...

DanGPR

988 posts

171 months

Tuesday 30th September 2014
quotequote all
LeftmostAardvark said:
black-k1 said:
For me it would be pointless. I so rarely use the 170bhp I already have.

What I would like is a 125ftlb flat torque curve (line?) biggrin
That'll be a 103ci Harley with a stage 1 and a cam then...


Unfortunately it is attached to a Rocket 3.

HollywoodStig

902 posts

149 months

Tuesday 30th September 2014
quotequote all
Not really.

200hp & 155kg is enough for me.

Fair play for having a crack at making something bonkers though - might help throw a bit of a halo across the next ZX10r etc.

BigHeartedTone

Original Poster:

1,304 posts

217 months

Tuesday 30th September 2014
quotequote all
Yes to 300hp.
There will be few opportunities to use it but when you can - wahay!


Mr2Mike

20,143 posts

255 months

Tuesday 30th September 2014
quotequote all
black-k1 said:
nono

Anything but boring. Real world exciting, not track flat out.
sleep Vehicles with very linear, constant acceleration do tend to be boring, even if they are ultimately very quick in practice. There's a good reason that two strokes with tiny powerbands were such fun to ride.

Edited by Mr2Mike on Tuesday 30th September 22:19

Hooli

32,278 posts

200 months

Tuesday 30th September 2014
quotequote all
DanGPR said:
LeftmostAardvark said:
black-k1 said:
For me it would be pointless. I so rarely use the 170bhp I already have.

What I would like is a 125ftlb flat torque curve (line?) biggrin
That'll be a 103ci Harley with a stage 1 and a cam then...


Unfortunately it is attached to a Rocket 3.
GSX14 is too shabby for torque either


supersingle

3,205 posts

219 months

Tuesday 30th September 2014
quotequote all
No, not interested anymore. I've had powerful bikes and found them to be boring on the road. Cruising along you're nowhere near peak torque so throttle response is poor. To be anywhere near peak torque means you're going very fast, which is more frightening than fun IMO. I want to be able to thrash the engine without risking going into orbit!

100bhp is more than enough for me. I don't place any limit on torque though. I'm looking for a buell S1 at the moment smile

mckeann

2,986 posts

229 months

Tuesday 30th September 2014
quotequote all
HollywoodStig said:
Not really.

200hp & 155kg is enough for me.

Fair play for having a crack at making something bonkers though - might help throw a bit of a halo across the next ZX10r etc.
What do you have with 200bhp and 155kg????

Johnny

9,652 posts

284 months

Tuesday 30th September 2014
quotequote all
Of fking course!

200bhp is lovely.

300bhp will just be lovelierer.

Mastodon2

13,825 posts

165 months

Tuesday 30th September 2014
quotequote all
I'd like to try one, like this new Kawasaki H2R, but I wouldn't want to own one, mainly because my riding far from warrants needing 300bhp. I couldn't even come close being able to use a fraction the power.

Part of the fun of riding my 600 (with a measly 100bhp) is that I can use a lot of the revs, and feel like I'm giving the bike a bit of stick, even when I know a more capable rider could get way, way more out of it than me. I'd barely be able to tickle a 300bhp bike, but I wouldn't say no to a ride, just open the throttle a few times, cack myself and get off.

BigHeartedTone

Original Poster:

1,304 posts

217 months

Tuesday 30th September 2014
quotequote all
supersingle said:
No, not interested anymore. I've had powerful bikes and found them to be boring on the road. Cruising along you're nowhere near peak torque so throttle response is poor. To be anywhere near peak torque means you're going very fast, which is more frightening than fun IMO. I want to be able to thrash the engine without risking going into orbit!

100bhp is more than enough for me. I don't place any limit on torque though. I'm looking for a buell S1 at the moment smile
The beauty of the SC is it should deliver far more torque through the rev range, so though you won't be at peak torque there will still be plenty.

Its worth reading Kevin Cameron's article
http://www.cycleworld.com/2014/09/30/2015-kawasaki...

It seems the SC will operate at 2 speeds for two rev ranges.

Dog Star

16,121 posts

168 months

Wednesday 1st October 2014
quotequote all
300bhp in a road bike. Let's be honest - that's fking ridiculous and totally pointless.

That H2 looks pretty cool though.

LoonR1

26,988 posts

177 months

Wednesday 1st October 2014
quotequote all
It's not a road bike and never will be.

RemaL

24,973 posts

234 months

Wednesday 1st October 2014
quotequote all
mckeann said:
HollywoodStig said:
Not really.

200hp & 155kg is enough for me.

Fair play for having a crack at making something bonkers though - might help throw a bit of a halo across the next ZX10r etc.
What do you have with 200bhp and 155kg????
I was going to ask the same thing. The new BMW 1000rr has "only" 199 BHP and is no ware close to 155kg even without fuel and liquids

Custard test anyone

Nigel Worc's

8,121 posts

188 months

Wednesday 1st October 2014
quotequote all
Nope, I find the 45 bhp I have is plenty to bimble.

I look forward to the day that bikes are GPS limited, just bikes mind, car drivers are fine, but I'd love to see the power rangers stuck at speed limits.

smokin

grahamr88

421 posts

173 months

Wednesday 1st October 2014
quotequote all
RemaL said:
I was going to ask the same thing. The new BMW 1000rr has "only" 199 BHP and is no ware close to 155kg even without fuel and liquids

Custard test anyone
A quick check of his profile would suggest that it's a 1199 Superleggera. The 155kg appears to be a dry weight, but that's still insane! I bet my motocross bike with a thick coating of mud doesn't weight much less than that. Pictures please!

Nigel Worc's said:
I look forward to the day that bikes are GPS limited, just bikes mind, car drivers are fine, but I'd love to see the power rangers stuck at speed limits.
Why?