148mph .... with pillion !

148mph .... with pillion !

Author
Discussion

evil len

Original Poster:

4,398 posts

270 months

Monday 30th March 2015
quotequote all
M11 biker Paul Roberts banned after speeding at 148mph

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-essex-3212019...

Hooli

32,278 posts

201 months

Monday 30th March 2015
quotequote all
So what? it's not that fast, I've done that in the UK with a pillion & no kittens died.

Fleegle

16,690 posts

177 months

Monday 30th March 2015
quotequote all
Hooli said:
So what? it's not that fast, I've done that in the UK with a pillion & no kittens died.
Not on your bikes you didn't

Pebbles167

3,457 posts

153 months

Monday 30th March 2015
quotequote all
It's irresponsible. On a road that busy and especially with a pillion.

But still, it's not really newsworthy in my opinion, and it's not that fast.

mickrick

3,700 posts

174 months

Monday 30th March 2015
quotequote all
It's fast if you hit something solid.....

Hooli

32,278 posts

201 months

Monday 30th March 2015
quotequote all
Fleegle said:
Hooli said:
So what? it's not that fast, I've done that in the UK with a pillion & no kittens died.
Not on your bikes you didn't
The clocks say I did, although I know they are 8% fast at all speeds I've tested so I might have been a few mph below that when it was indicating over 150.

bass gt3

10,205 posts

234 months

Monday 30th March 2015
quotequote all
Hooli said:
Fleegle said:
Hooli said:
So what? it's not that fast, I've done that in the UK with a pillion & no kittens died.
Not on your bikes you didn't
The clocks say I did, although I know they are 8% fast at all speeds I've tested so I might have been a few mph below that when it was indicating over 150.
You know we're talking MPH here right?? wink

Baryonyx

18,000 posts

160 months

Monday 30th March 2015
quotequote all
I suspect he would have thought the camera bike was racing him. Just let it go...

Hooli

32,278 posts

201 months

Monday 30th March 2015
quotequote all
bass gt3 said:
Hooli said:
Fleegle said:
Hooli said:
So what? it's not that fast, I've done that in the UK with a pillion & no kittens died.
Not on your bikes you didn't
The clocks say I did, although I know they are 8% fast at all speeds I've tested so I might have been a few mph below that when it was indicating over 150.
You know we're talking MPH here right?? wink
You're aware this is me not srob aren't you? wink

terry tibbs

2,198 posts

222 months

Monday 30th March 2015
quotequote all
weaving in and out of traffic is the stupid thing not the actual speed

Andy XRV

3,845 posts

181 months

Monday 30th March 2015
quotequote all
He's a bit of a tt riding like that on the M11. There are always unmarked cars on that stretch and even if he wasn't speeding diving across all three lanes like that is a certain nick.

mike150

493 posts

201 months

Monday 30th March 2015
quotequote all
mickrick said:
It's fast if you hit something solid.....
LOL!................The man is right



Prof Prolapse

16,160 posts

191 months

Monday 30th March 2015
quotequote all
When I was a kid I used to get taken out on the bike and my stepdad would occasionally do this sort of speed after he got his almost new GSXR 1100 and wanted to push it. Also one of my uncles used to do wheelies whilst I was on the back. It was great fun.

Then again this was the 90's before bikers were all middle class, middle aged, Daily mail readers.

I died a couple of times, but folks were much tougher back then.

Vipers

32,897 posts

229 months

Monday 30th March 2015
quotequote all
Anybody can drive fast, just twist that throttle, usually works.

Driving irresponsibility is something any one do as well.




smile

HertsBiker

6,313 posts

272 months

Monday 30th March 2015
quotequote all
148? Ha ha ha. Although I will be keeping the speed down after this, on all roads. Until I can't see anyone following.

Isn't it funny though, the camera vehicle without lights and sirens is perfectly legal to do the exact same speeds, yet is just as dangerous if we are to beleive the speed is dangerous bores.


spud989

2,753 posts

181 months

Monday 30th March 2015
quotequote all
Twice the limit and weaving. Yet I'm sure I've heard of people getting a couple of months in prison for less?

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/crime/80988...

^ That seems fairly comparable for speed and the weaving.


Not saying I agree with the severity of either case, but why isn't there more consistency?

Pothole

34,367 posts

283 months

Monday 30th March 2015
quotequote all
I can see where the camera speedo reads 148mph but that's the speed the camera bike had to do to catch up, surely? Where's the video of the measured distance/constant speed to calculate from?

I'm betting that apart from possible wind noise it didn't feel that fast on a ZZR14.

WaferThinHam

1,680 posts

131 months

Monday 30th March 2015
quotequote all
Deserves it for not clocking the camera bike.

Even though it was unmarked, a bike making all the same moves as you when you're pressing on, yet doesn't want to pass? Rider bolt upright? Textiles? On a beemer (probably)? Panniers/tank bag?

Got to be rozzers.

Vipers

32,897 posts

229 months

Monday 30th March 2015
quotequote all
HertsBiker said:
148? Ha ha ha. Although I will be keeping the speed down after this, on all roads. Until I can't see anyone following.

Isn't it funny though, the camera vehicle without lights and sirens is perfectly legal to do the exact same speeds, yet is just as dangerous if we are to beleive the speed is dangerous bores.
Interesting, how do you know there was no sirens, the vid has no sound. I would like to think the skill of the police far exceed that of the average biker.




smile

Wacky Racer

38,178 posts

248 months

Monday 30th March 2015
quotequote all
How predictable...the same PH posters defending the indefensible..rolleyes

Let me see now.....148mph.....with pillion....crowded motorway with 70mph speed limit...scratchchin

£2000 fine....six months imprisonment...bike crushed...take him down.......judge



That'll learn 'im.