Have we all become biking gods?

Have we all become biking gods?

Author
Discussion

cmaguire

3,589 posts

109 months

Sunday 19th February 2017
quotequote all
SAS Tom said:
He's not the only one given the claims in some current threads.
I often feel incompetent on my modern bikes. I felt far more heroic as metal scuffed the tarmac on my GPZ900R or my GS1000 (provided I wasn't crashing at the time).

Loyly

17,996 posts

159 months

Monday 20th February 2017
quotequote all
Biker's Nemesis said:
A 1985 GSX-R 750 built by Suzuki GB to original specification for the classic show lapped Mallory Park 1 second slower than a BMW S1000R Sport and was only 1.5 seconds slower than a Honda 600RR.
That's quite a staggering feat. There must be 20 years between the GSXR and the the CBR600RR.

To the OP, I haven't been biking long enough to really have perspective on power now vs then and what we make of it all. My T595 is from 1997 though, and makes (apparently) 130bhp overall, translated to 117rwhp. Anyone who was used to the chassis, power and brakes of a modern bike would probably think it was old and st and it was never as fast as the Fireblades and R1's it was sold against.

I try to keep a little perspective on it when I consider the 'middling' performance stats. It has never felt slow to me, and aside from newer bikes, I rarely encounter anything faster on it. I'm no riding god, but I try to remember that in 1997, when it rolled out of the factory, it was a 'top tier' performing bike. I don't have any less respect for it just because the technology has moved on.

These days, I think a lot of lads look straight past 600cc bikes and go straight for the heavy firepower. Even my younger mates have their eyes on litre bikes. I think I could chop my Daytona in for a CBR 600RR or a 636 ZXR and be perfectly happy.

Biker's Nemesis

38,645 posts

208 months

Monday 20th February 2017
quotequote all
Loyly said:
That's quite a staggering feat. There must be 20 years between the GSXR and 600RR.
It is, Rutter rode all the bikes on track at Mallory.

scunnylad

1,723 posts

169 months

Monday 20th February 2017
quotequote all

That's some going by Rutter , anyone know what tyres they were using ?

Bit off topic but I've just bought a nail of a 1986 slabside to rebuild

Biker's Nemesis

38,645 posts

208 months

Monday 20th February 2017
quotequote all
It was either Avons or continentals On the GSXR Kev. I'll check when I get home

STe_rsv4

657 posts

98 months

Monday 20th February 2017
quotequote all
I overtook my mates 2014 Fireblade on my 16 year old T955i on the way to seahouses yesterday but I dont consider myself a riding god.









More of a Demi-god wink

carmadgaz

3,201 posts

183 months

Monday 20th February 2017
quotequote all
It is as others have said technology moving forwards.

I have been lucky enough to get behind the wheel of a 1911 Sunbeam 16/20. A former Shelsley Walsh hillclimb champion car and while it was a fast car back in the day my humble little MX-5 can outdo it in every aspect today.

julian64

14,317 posts

254 months

Monday 20th February 2017
quotequote all
The GSXR 750 is dead because it has no space to play in todays bike lineup.

go back twenty years and litre bikes were huge. So huge you wouldn't think of taking them on a track. They were point and squirt bikes. The 750s were a good compromise between handling and power but even the 750's of twenty years ago were difficult to get round a track. I remember trying to get an XS 850 round brands and having my father on an XS 750 go round the inside of me because the 850 was significantly heavier. Dropping an XS850 would require two people to pull it back upright.

So there was a time when a gsx750 was the ultimate track bike because of the compromises.

Now it has no role as there are no compromises. Most litre bikes are smaller than the CB250 I used to have as a Kid! I wouldn't want anything lighter than the litre bike I have now, and I don't think anyone else would want anything much lighter either.

The reason for the gsx750 has disappeared.

cmaguire

3,589 posts

109 months

Monday 20th February 2017
quotequote all
julian64 said:
The GSXR 750 is dead because it has no space to play in todays bike lineup.

go back twenty years and litre bikes were huge. So huge you wouldn't think of taking them on a track. They were point and squirt bikes. The 750s were a good compromise between handling and power but even the 750's of twenty years ago were difficult to get round a track. I remember trying to get an XS 850 round brands and having my father on an XS 750 go round the inside of me because the 850 was significantly heavier. Dropping an XS850 would require two people to pull it back upright.

So there was a time when a gsx750 was the ultimate track bike because of the compromises.

Now it has no role as there are no compromises. Most litre bikes are smaller than the CB250 I used to have as a Kid! I wouldn't want anything lighter than the litre bike I have now, and I don't think anyone else would want anything much lighter either.

The reason for the gsx750 has disappeared.
Weight is the one area where they near enough all come unstuck still. Most seem to have got fatter in the last 10 years.
If progress with weight reduction was in line with all the other progress the litre bikes ought to be 175Kg and not 200Kg.
I'd be a lot happier with 175Kg. 200 sucks.

Dr Doofenshmirtz

15,222 posts

200 months

Monday 20th February 2017
quotequote all
Is it the same for bikes as it is for cars...In my day a Sierra RS Cosworth with 201bhp was the thing of dreams.
Now 201bhp is seen as a bit 'meh'.