Are quickshifters inherantly bad for the gearbox?
Discussion
gareth_r said:
Tango13 said:
This was going back a few years, about 2018 iirc
Wasn't there a Kawasaki road bike that had neutral at the bottom back in the 70's, KH750 springs to mind?
That was a Kawasaki (stupid) thing until the Z1 IIRC. Wasn't there a Kawasaki road bike that had neutral at the bottom back in the 70's, KH750 springs to mind?
There was a reason why Velocette designed the first positive-stop footchange with neutral between 1 and 2.
gareth_r said:
Tango13 said:
This was going back a few years, about 2018 iirc
Wasn't there a Kawasaki road bike that had neutral at the bottom back in the 70's, KH750 springs to mind?
That was a Kawasaki (stupid) thing until the Z1 IIRC. Wasn't there a Kawasaki road bike that had neutral at the bottom back in the 70's, KH750 springs to mind?
There was a reason why Velocette designed the first positive-stop footchange with neutral between 1 and 2.
Scott's two speed solution is an interesting one, from what I can see it's pretty much a DSG system as each gear has its own clutch operated by foot. They were using that in the 1910s with foot change.
Yamaha Fizzy's had neutral at the top too from memory?!
Biker9090 said:
The more I dig into this on the 1290 it seems to be a "missed shift" with the QS between 5th and 6th, it then engages and the box goes boom.....
I suspect user error, a big V twin needs a longer time to change gears, some people don't know how to use them. They are not a bimbling bike, you need to be a little more positive, or perhaps aggressive with them to make sure there's enough force to slot the gear home. They don't take any prisoners, onwards and upwards Gassing Station | Biker Banter | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff