Boss Hoss parked in Buxton today
Discussion
Riding God said:
King Herald said:
Riding God said:
I'm not seeing any sort of cooling system, so obviously not a street bike. I wonder what drive system it uses?Range Rover flywheel and clutch. Clutch shaft - sprocket welded on end - supported bearing housing. Chain drops diagonally right linking shortened Kawasaki GT750 shaft (drive) - sprocket welded on end of shaft - supported bearing housing. GT750 diff driving Merc 15 inch alloy - Fiesta vented disc / caliper inside wheel.
Q plate, road legal.
Heavy as fk, handles like a pig. Huge potential for improvement.
Riding God said:
King Herald said:
Riding God said:
I'm not seeing any sort of cooling system, so obviously not a street bike. I wonder what drive system it uses?Range Rover flywheel and clutch. Clutch shaft - sprocket welded on end - supported bearing housing. Chain drops diagonally right linking shortened Kawasaki GT750 shaft (drive) - sprocket welded on end of shaft - supported bearing housing. GT750 diff driving Merc 15 inch alloy - Fiesta vented disc / caliper inside wheel.
Q plate, road legal.
Heavy as fk, handles like a pig. Huge potential for improvement.
The single gear ratio must play hell with riding, as the RV8 doesn't have that huge a spread of torque, 0-150mph in one gear? Mind you, once you get up to the ideal geared speed it would be grand with that V8 burble and power on tap.
Here's some more detail of the 1000lb Chevy I built, engineering on a far heavier scale than the bike in your pic.
I can feel the creative juices flowing again....
Thinking out loud here.
What IS the most compact V8 car engine, i wonder?
(Nothing out of a 2007 Ferrari, you understand!)
Something available for sensible bucks.
Something like the 5.0 version of a Rover V8, as found in a TVR Griffith.
Is that any smaller and lighter than say a 5.0, 302 cubic inch Mustang engine?
What IS the most compact V8 car engine, i wonder?
(Nothing out of a 2007 Ferrari, you understand!)
Something available for sensible bucks.
Something like the 5.0 version of a Rover V8, as found in a TVR Griffith.
Is that any smaller and lighter than say a 5.0, 302 cubic inch Mustang engine?
Beemer-5 said:
Thinking out loud here.
What IS the most compact V8 car engine, i wonder?
(Nothing out of a 2007 Ferrari, you understand!)
Something available for sensible bucks.
Something like the 5.0 version of a Rover V8, as found in a TVR Griffith.
Is that any smaller and lighter than say a 5.0, 302 cubic inch Mustang engine?
The TVR tuscan V8 will fit in a 22 inch cube - so is very compact.What IS the most compact V8 car engine, i wonder?
(Nothing out of a 2007 Ferrari, you understand!)
Something available for sensible bucks.
Something like the 5.0 version of a Rover V8, as found in a TVR Griffith.
Is that any smaller and lighter than say a 5.0, 302 cubic inch Mustang engine?
rev-erend said:
Beemer-5 said:
Thinking out loud here.
What IS the most compact V8 car engine, i wonder?
(Nothing out of a 2007 Ferrari, you understand!)
Something available for sensible bucks.
Something like the 5.0 version of a Rover V8, as found in a TVR Griffith.
Is that any smaller and lighter than say a 5.0, 302 cubic inch Mustang engine?
The TVR tuscan V8 will fit in a 22 inch cube - so is very compact.What IS the most compact V8 car engine, i wonder?
(Nothing out of a 2007 Ferrari, you understand!)
Something available for sensible bucks.
Something like the 5.0 version of a Rover V8, as found in a TVR Griffith.
Is that any smaller and lighter than say a 5.0, 302 cubic inch Mustang engine?
Surely with the weight of a bike you could use the engine as a stressed member and do without heavy cradle frames around the engine - a V8 should be smooth enough to prevent monstrous vibration? Just bolt a swingarm to the back of the block and some forks to the front
Of course, I've never even tried engineering such as this so my ideas may be idiotic. But it sure looks like fun, even if I'd personally be too scared to ride a bike with 500 foot pounds of torque and similar horsepower
I am no engineer, one or two others (above) may know better, but i'd think that the torque of a 5.7 or 7.0 or 8.2 litre Chevvy motor would shake the bike to bits, without a strong frame???
That or the motor would take off, of it's own accord and leave the rest of the bike and you behind!
That or the motor would take off, of it's own accord and leave the rest of the bike and you behind!
Beemer-5 said:
I am no engineer, one or two others (above) may know better, but i'd think that the torque of a 5.7 or 7.0 or 8.2 litre Chevvy motor would shake the bike to bits, without a strong frame???
That or the motor would take off, of it's own accord and leave the rest of the bike and you behind!
I was thinking that plenty of formula race cars use the engine as a stressed member, hanging the gearbox and rear transmission / suspension off the back of the engine... and cars like this put a lot more torsional loading on the 'frame' of the 'chassis' due to 4 fat contact patches and downforce - must be easy on a bike, there won't be as high transverse 'twisting' of the engine block under cornering forces.That or the motor would take off, of it's own accord and leave the rest of the bike and you behind!
I'd have thought the block itself would be a stiffer lump of metal than any tube frame, just bolt the front and back bits of the bike to respective ends of the engine
Then again, I'm no engineer either, I just love seeing the creations of those who *do* have the talent and skill to make mad machines like this
Beemer-5 said:
I am no engineer, one or two others (above) may know better, but i'd think that the torque of a 5.7 or 7.0 or 8.2 litre Chevvy motor would shake the bike to bits, without a strong frame???
That or the motor would take off, of it's own accord and leave the rest of the bike and you behind!
Boss Hosses obviously don't fly to bits. My 1200 Sportster feels like it is on the verge of self destructing once you reach 2800rpm, and a large capacity v8 runs so much more smoother than that. That or the motor would take off, of it's own accord and leave the rest of the bike and you behind!
The V8 I built felt real smooth with the motor running, even though I never got to actually drive it more than two metres. It certainly felt good revving a big V8 with a motorcycle throttle control.
My bike had the front of the frame suspended from the exhaust manifold studs, and the rear was held on by the ally plates bolted to the ends of the motor.
Beemer-5 said:
So a frameless Boss Hoss would work?
Yep.But Boss Hoss is just so 'yesterday'.
What you need is a blower, to make some SERIOUS power, forget all that 'streetable' stuff:
http://www.gizmag.com/go/6762/
cyberface said:
Surely with the weight of a bike you could use the engine as a stressed member and do without heavy cradle frames around the engine - a V8 should be smooth enough to prevent monstrous vibration? Just bolt a swingarm to the back of the block and some forks to the front
The 'TVR bike' has no frame. The front and rear sections are separate and bolt to either end of the motor. It is mock built only, though it has lots of potential to actually work quite well. Maybe one day soon I'll give it the attention it deserves and finish it. That and give it a 300 + HP motor.
Gassing Station | Biker Banter | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff