DIY tuners and mappers unite

DIY tuners and mappers unite

Author
Discussion

Sardonicus

18,957 posts

221 months

Wednesday 10th April 2013
quotequote all
Steve_D said:
Leave it as it is.
When you lift off and overrun you don't need any fuel at all and you can in fact unable fuel-cut which shuts it off completely. If you richen it you will just waste fuel.

Steve
Exactly thumbup not sure you will gain another 10MPG though which is a shame laugh

Pink_Floyd

900 posts

221 months

Thursday 11th April 2013
quotequote all
Are you running MS with a wideband lambda, if so what happens when the lambda is cold and warming up, do you use some default in the tables untill the lambda starts giving sensible results.

db418BHP

Original Poster:

8,655 posts

220 months

Thursday 11th April 2013
quotequote all
Pink_Floyd said:
Are you running MS with a wideband lambda, if so what happens when the lambda is cold and warming up, do you use some default in the tables untill the lambda starts giving sensible results.
I have a Techedge but its not connected to MS at the moment. Cant think why not. Its something i need to do i think. At least for datalogging

Sardonicus

18,957 posts

221 months

Thursday 11th April 2013
quotequote all
Pink_Floyd said:
Are you running MS with a wideband lambda, if so what happens when the lambda is cold and warming up, do you use some default in the tables untill the lambda starts giving sensible results.
MS uses another table for this condition WUE (WARM UP ENRICHMENT) and you can stop/edit the Lambda probe from going closed loop till a certain coolant temp is met for example 75 degrees if you want and providing your using CL feedback, if your not then your just using the WUE table during warm up, as mentioned already there is an auto-tune function for the WUE currently in Beta form and under testing in the latest paid for TunerStudio update scratchchin set your AFR targets for warm up and your off ........ hopefully wink although I don't think its necessary IMO biggrin


Edited by Sardonicus on Thursday 11th April 11:12

angus99

620 posts

209 months

Thursday 11th April 2013
quotequote all
SILICONEKID350HP said:
The spark table needs more work .It could be worked on higher up the rev range..

I`m very frustrated not knowing how to tune the engine ! I want to use the auto tune but i`m clueless.

Should the current tune come straight on the screen once it`s plugged in ?

Who is tuning Alpha N TPS or Map ?

When does it go from open to closed loop ? and how would I know if the lambdas are cslibrated without comparing them to a rolling road .

How can the megasquirt be tuned for closed loop ? so many questions ..I want to go to Megasquirt school ..
I use a combination of Autotune, VE analyser in Megalog Viewer and some manual smoothing in Excel.

Autotune is handy if you are out in the car and want to make changes on the fly. Here’s a few pointers although I’ve only worked this out from trial and error.
  • Don’t use the ‘auto update controller’ as this will make any of your logs useless for any further tuning using the VE analyser function in megalogviewer as you won’t have a base tune for comparison.
  • Set the filters so that autotune does not adjust the map when warm up enrichment is on. Otherwise the software will lean out the MAP to compensate.
  • Start logging within tuner studio and then start auto tune.
  • Go for a drive and see what changes autotune recommends to the MAP. If you are happy with them, Click to burn the changes to the ECU. Before doing this its good idea to stop data logging and save the current tune so that you can use the log with Magalogviewr later. I usually save the logs and tune files with similar names, i.e. run1, run2 etc.
  • Repeat above until you are happy.
Alternatively you can just log data in Tunerstudio and then do all the analysis in megalogviewer once you are home. I actually find megalogviewer to works slightly better than autotune for me as you have more filtering options. Its also a good tool for checking the autotune generated tables.

When you connect your laptop, tunerstudio will compare the setting on the ECU with those in tunerstudio. If there are any changes you will get the option to either select the tunerstudio settings (if you have made changes) of the ECU settings.

I’m using Alpha-N pretty sure you are too if Phil set it up.

I Haven’t used EGO control yet and have the controller authority set to Zero. I think it only really works well during cruising and won’t have time to react during acceleration, deceleration or high loads, so you still need to get the VE table correct first.

Calibration of the Lambda’s is usually done free to air before installation. Mine has a calibration button on the controller for this.




Edited by angus99 on Thursday 11th April 11:15

angus99

620 posts

209 months

Thursday 11th April 2013
quotequote all
Pink_Floyd said:
Are you running MS with a wideband lambda, if so what happens when the lambda is cold and warming up, do you use some default in the tables untill the lambda starts giving sensible results.
Closed loop isn’t used during start-up so the warm up time for the Lambda isn’t an issue.

Initially the fuel is controlled by the cranking settings (cranking pulse width) until the engine speed exceeds the cranking RPM (default setting is ~300rpm) Above this RPM the VE table is used to Control the fuelling with additional After Start Enrichment (ASE) and Warmup Enrichment (WUE).

SILICONEKID350HP

14,997 posts

231 months

Thursday 11th April 2013
quotequote all
I`ve been told using a Maff which I think is a AFM is far better than a air temp sensor ..What are the advantages with these new Maff units .




db418BHP

Original Poster:

8,655 posts

220 months

Thursday 11th April 2013
quotequote all
I just got back home after a 331 mile drive in just over 4 and a half hours. The first 200 miles was done in under 3 hours and i tanked up with just 31.5 litres that equals 28.8 mpg. I must have done something right with the recent mapping. Happy as

Sardonicus

18,957 posts

221 months

Thursday 11th April 2013
quotequote all
db418BHP said:
I just got back home after a 331 mile drive in just over 4 and a half hours. The first 200 miles was done in under 3 hours and i tanked up with just 31.5 litres that equals 28.8 mpg. I must have done something right with the recent mapping. Happy as
Everyday a school day Derek nice one thumbup

db418BHP

Original Poster:

8,655 posts

220 months

Thursday 11th April 2013
quotequote all
Sardonicus said:
veryday a school day Derek nice one thumbup
Just looking at the map now. Looks a right mess. A bit of tidying needed. Next step to weaken low speed full throttle and check balls out wink

Pupp

12,217 posts

272 months

Thursday 11th April 2013
quotequote all
db418BHP said:
Next step to weaken low speed full throttle and check balls out wink
Put your knock-cans on! smile

SILICONEKID350HP

14,997 posts

231 months

Thursday 11th April 2013
quotequote all
What RPM does the open and closed loop activate ? once it goes in to open loop how is it tuned because the lambdas are not working .

Does it go on to open loop because the Lambdas can not send the signal back quick enough..confused

Edited by SILICONEKID350HP on Friday 12th April 10:39

phazed

21,844 posts

204 months

Thursday 11th April 2013
quotequote all
Derek, since we spoke earlier, I've walked the dags, been to the cinema and had a meal out and you've only done 300 odd miles, blimey!

db418BHP

Original Poster:

8,655 posts

220 months

Thursday 11th April 2013
quotequote all
Pupp said:
Put your knock-cans on! smile
Cruising was good in the high 14's and sometimes low 15's
Just a little acceleration at between 2000 and 3000 rpm saw 11's and 10's so thats why i need to weaken it off a bit. I will be happy to see 12.5 at the least

phazed

21,844 posts

204 months

Thursday 11th April 2013
quotequote all
You should have a little more then 13 on light acceleration and a full 12.8 under hard acceleration imo.

macdeb

8,508 posts

255 months

Friday 12th April 2013
quotequote all
Excellent thread, keep it coming thumbup

v8 racing

2,064 posts

251 months

Friday 12th April 2013
quotequote all
db418BHP said:
I am going to modify my spark table like this and go check the fuelling in the same areas tonight

it does amaze me everytime i see a car set up on the rollers with aftermarket ecu's, they never seem to do anything with the ignition map like your original one, and once you map the fuel and then change the ignition the fuel map is then useless so start all over again!.
Just out of interest dont be shy to run lots of advance on part throttle, a stock rover dizzy runs 50deg on cruise.
And derek get rid of that 34deg at the topend bud, just flatline it at 28, no more power is gained but a very risk of detonation or melting something.

db418BHP

Original Poster:

8,655 posts

220 months

Friday 12th April 2013
quotequote all
v8 racing said:
it does amaze me everytime i see a car set up on the rollers with aftermarket ecu's, they never seem to do anything with the ignition map like your original one, and once you map the fuel and then change the ignition the fuel map is then useless so start all over again!.
Just out of interest dont be shy to run lots of advance on part throttle, a stock rover dizzy runs 50deg on cruise.
And derek get rid of that 34deg at the topend bud, just flatline it at 28, no more power is gained but a very risk of detonation or melting something.
Cheers Rob, these are the sort of no nonsense comments i need. I will make some changes and retune on the fly and report back.

SILICONEKID350HP

14,997 posts

231 months

Friday 12th April 2013
quotequote all
Some of the mappers want to replace the air temp sensor for one of these new MAFF units ! any advantages ..?

GasMunkey

5,697 posts

179 months

Friday 12th April 2013
quotequote all
IMO MAF is way better than a just using a air temp sensor

I'm sure you could use both

Draw backs of a maf is cost,

They can cause turbulence (some times) of the air on the way in

And they do get damaged really easily