Post your dyno curve here

Post your dyno curve here

Author
Discussion

TV8

3,122 posts

176 months

Friday 1st November 2013
quotequote all
macdeb said:
Guys, not wishing to piss on someones fireworks, but I seem to remember not too long back on here that a serious amount of work had to be done on a RV8 to achieve monster status [300hp]. Now it seems everyones doing it, so, what's changed? Just a thought scratchchin
I would say a lot of is down the aftermarket ECU's most people are using. Mine has the original stuff and only just breaks 300 despite extra capacity.

Chilliman

11,992 posts

162 months

Friday 1st November 2013
quotequote all
macdeb said:
Guys, not wishing to piss on someones fireworks, but I seem to remember not too long back on here that a serious amount of work had to be done on a RV8 to achieve monster status [300hp]. Now it seems everyones doing it, so, what's changed? Just a thought scratchchin
Technology and disposable income Mac wink

Chilliman

11,992 posts

162 months

Friday 1st November 2013
quotequote all
ChimpOnGas said:
Chilli comes in on top with a mighty 72.02hp per litre, making it the most efficient RV8 of the group so far bow Can anyone beat Chilli?
Apparently not biggrin

whistle

Pupp

12,236 posts

273 months

Friday 1st November 2013
quotequote all
whistle


ctsdave

872 posts

175 months

Friday 1st November 2013
quotequote all
domV8 said:
Looking at the torque vs BHP figures, I'm guessing it made that BHP around 6800-7000rpm or similar..?

Dom
Hi Dom. You are bang on where peak power was matey!!

Chimpongas - although it was a race engine, it was a pussycat to drive round thr paddock etc. Would even pull up mams street in 5th at about 20-30mph lol...

SILICONEKID343HP

14,997 posts

232 months

Friday 1st November 2013
quotequote all
Now what do the squiggly lines mean !



Chuffmeister

3,597 posts

138 months

Saturday 2nd November 2013
quotequote all
SILICONEKID343HP said:
Now what do the squiggly lines mean !


How did you get an additional 65bhp on the same day?

Alexdaredevils

5,697 posts

180 months

Saturday 2nd November 2013
quotequote all
4.6 V8D with ranger rover cam! before and after decat


phazed

21,844 posts

205 months

Saturday 2nd November 2013
quotequote all
Chuffmeister said:
How did you get an additional 65bhp on the same day?
At the fly and wheels.

A900ss

3,253 posts

153 months

Saturday 2nd November 2013
quotequote all
Alexdaredevils said:
4.6 V8D with ranger rover cam! before and after decat

25hp just from a decat? Impressive.

Surely that's not the normal increase though?

Chilliman

11,992 posts

162 months

Saturday 2nd November 2013
quotequote all
A900ss said:
Alexdaredevils said:
4.6 V8D with ranger rover cam! before and after decat

25hp just from a decat? Impressive.

Surely that's not the normal increase though?
It's pretty much what I got also smile and it made a significant difference to the torque curve... Seemed like it was the last piece of the puzzle to unleash the horses that were already in there trying to get out biggrin

QBee

20,994 posts

145 months

Saturday 2nd November 2013
quotequote all
Daz, if you are serious, the top squiggly line means you have 370 torques. The bottom one means you have nice even fuelling across the rev range. 1 lambda = 14.7 AFR, so yours is running at 12 to 13 AFR.

SILICONEKID343HP

14,997 posts

232 months

Saturday 2nd November 2013
quotequote all
Chuffmeister said:
How did you get an additional 65bhp on the same day?
Bottom one is at the wheel.

SILICONEKID343HP

14,997 posts

232 months

Saturday 2nd November 2013
quotequote all
QBee said:
Daz, if you are serious, the top squiggly line means you have 370 torques. The bottom one means you have nice even fuelling across the rev range. 1 lambda = 14.7 AFR, so yours is running at 12 to 13 AFR.
Iam serious ,is 370 torques a lot and are you saying it`s setup to run 14.7 on cruise and 12 ,13afr on acceleration, Think my lambda gauge is miles out.

Don`t think there is a substitute of a rolling road for maximum power , a good mapper and then sorting the low down drivability out on the road.

I would recommend Jools all day long . He is one of those who knows what he is doing .cool


QBee

20,994 posts

145 months

Saturday 2nd November 2013
quotequote all
SILICONEKID343HP said:
QBee said:
Daz, if you are serious, the top squiggly line means you have 370 torques. The bottom one means you have nice even fuelling across the rev range. 1 lambda = 14.7 AFR, so yours is running at 12 to 13 AFR.
Iam serious ,is 370 torques a lot and are you saying it`s setup to run 14.7 on cruise and 12 ,13afr on acceleration, Think my lambda gauge is miles out.

Don`t think there is a substitute of a rolling road for maximum power , a good mapper and then sorting the low down drivability out on the road.

I would recommend Jools all day long . He is one of those who knows what he is doing .cool
Right. This is a power run, max boot in 4th gear IIRC. Your fuelling at that time (before any remapping you did yourself) was beautifully steady at 0.88 lambda (12.9 AFR), and it only drops to 0.84 lambda (12.3 AFR) at well over 5000 rpm.
It doesn't tell you what the fuelling is at a steady 60 mph on the M1.

But if you haven't changed anything, go for steady acceleration in fourth gear on an empty road and get a mate to watch your AFR gauge. That way you can calibrate it compared to the RR. Then you can compare how it reads while cruising.

SILICONEKID343HP

14,997 posts

232 months

Saturday 2nd November 2013
quotequote all
QBee said:
Right. This is a power run, max boot in 4th gear IIRC. Your fuelling at that time (before any remapping you did yourself) was beautifully steady at 0.88 lambda (12.9 AFR), and it only drops to 0.84 lambda (12.3 AFR) at well over 5000 rpm.
It doesn't tell you what the fuelling is at a steady 60 mph on the M1.

But if you haven't changed anything, go for steady acceleration in fourth gear on an empty road and get a mate to watch your AFR gauge. That way you can calibrate it compared to the RR. Then you can compare how it reads while cruising.
No not touched anything .

ctsdave

872 posts

175 months

Saturday 2nd November 2013
quotequote all
Alexdaredevils said:
Need dyno graph......
For all you none believers (haha) - here is the Dyno graph to prove... It is 3.9 bored out to just over 4ltr, steel rods, forged pistons, 256 cam, race heads and quad 48 dellorto's. As said previously, you could drive it like a pussycat if you wanted to, but plenty there when needed!! smile


QBee

20,994 posts

145 months

Saturday 2nd November 2013
quotequote all
SILICONEKID343HP said:
QBee said:
Right. This is a power run, max boot in 4th gear IIRC. Your fuelling at that time (before any remapping you did yourself) was beautifully steady at 0.88 lambda (12.9 AFR), and it only drops to 0.84 lambda (12.3 AFR) at well over 5000 rpm.
It doesn't tell you what the fuelling is at a steady 60 mph on the M1.

But if you haven't changed anything, go for steady acceleration in fourth gear on an empty road and get a mate to watch your AFR gauge. That way you can calibrate it compared to the RR. Then you can compare how it reads while cruising.
No not touched anything .
Found a post by blitzracing on another thread:


Target AFR for catalyst engine - 14.35:1 in closed loop- up to 3400 rpm.Above that as per non cat map.

Non cat map. Idle 13.5:1 or a bit richer to get a smooth idle. Acceleration phase- 12.5:1 Full power steady state 13:1. Light cruise 15.4:1


Hope this helps. So you should find your car running quite lean (AFR 15) on a light cruise. During acceleration it definitely was close to 12.5, as stated by blitzracing.

Chilliman

11,992 posts

162 months

Saturday 2nd November 2013
quotequote all
ctsdave said:
Alexdaredevils said:
Need dyno graph......
For all you none believers (haha) - here is the Dyno graph to prove... It is 3.9 bored out to just over 4ltr, steel rods, forged pistons, 256 cam, race heads and quad 48 dellorto's. As said previously, you could drive it like a pussycat if you wanted to, but plenty there when needed!! smile

Bugger. Back to the drawing board getmecoat

Seriously though, that's most impressive. Have been thinking about ITB's for some time now, (appreciate you have carb's), just to get that last bit of NA power out, but the dark side of the force(ed induction) is hard to ignore smile

Sardonicus

18,962 posts

222 months

Saturday 2nd November 2013
quotequote all
ctsdave said:
For all you none believers (haha) - here is the Dyno graph to prove... It is 3.9 bored out to just over 4ltr, steel rods, forged pistons, 256 cam, race heads and quad 48 dellorto's. As said previously, you could drive it like a pussycat if you wanted to, but plenty there when needed!! smile

bow Superb giant killer thumbup my kind of motor smokin