Check my CR sum assumptions

Check my CR sum assumptions

Author
Discussion

db484bhpv8

Original Poster:

8,655 posts

220 months

Wednesday 17th December 2014
quotequote all
Richard 858 said:
94.45 hp/litre here.
If we are taking power adders into consideration then i have 116 per litre tongue out

Brummmie

5,284 posts

221 months

Wednesday 17th December 2014
quotequote all
Richard 858 said:
94.45 hp/litre here.
Would want triple figures with FI! smile

phazed

21,844 posts

204 months

Wednesday 17th December 2014
quotequote all
Dammm, only 69bhp per litre and 84ftlb of torque.

Boosted LS1

21,187 posts

260 months

Wednesday 17th December 2014
quotequote all
Derek, you can measure the actual piston to head clearance with a feeler guage whilst the heads are installed. Piston to deck volume can be done by measuring down with a depth guage, dial guage or vernier. Piston bowl volume and head chamber volume you measure using a section of plastic like Brummie did. A cd case is good for this. Volumes can be determined using a large syringe or calibrated burettes etc. Then you can 'stack up' the maths. Your dynamic CR is more important then your calculated CR and the cam has a big effect on that. Dynamic is always lower the static.

If your engine could be set so the deck height was horizontal you could put some grease on the cylinder walls with the piston at tdc. This will seal the rings and you could measure the volume in there with oil delivered in measure volumes.

Richard 858

1,882 posts

135 months

Thursday 18th December 2014
quotequote all
Brummmie said:
Richard 858 said:
94.45 hp/litre here.
Would want triple figures with FI! smile
I thought this might start something smile Anymore and I'd be spin the rear up all over the shop, still that probably saves the transmission components ! and I can't afford to upgrade any more bits for a while (including any engine rebuilds, ECU etc. nono but bow to those that do thumbup Happy Christmas to all (even the traditionalists !)