S1 Exhaust rubber mounts

S1 Exhaust rubber mounts

Author
Discussion

Le TVR

Original Poster:

3,092 posts

252 months

Friday 22nd July 2016
quotequote all
After an unfortunate encounter with some road works this morning, all 3 rubber mounts for the exhaust have failed and its now dragging on the road. Has anyone found a suitable or better replacement?
TVR Car parts have got Tasmin ones?

Thanks

phillpot

17,119 posts

184 months

Friday 22nd July 2016
quotequote all



These are the correct part, Clicky, same as Tasmin?

Le TVR

Original Poster:

3,092 posts

252 months

Monday 25th July 2016
quotequote all
Thanks for that but they are quite different:


The centre 2 have failed in Tension and the tail pipe support in shear. Have made a temporary repair with M8 bolts and silicon hose pieces.

magpies

5,129 posts

183 months

Monday 25th July 2016
quotequote all
those are 'mini' exhaust bobbins(can be quite weak) and not the correct rubbers for the support adjacent to the centre box - they are rubber doughnuts with a bolt through. The mounting is the welded brackets on the chassis with a 25mm hole. That is th main support and the rear support is the 'mini' bobbin type.

Of course every S could be different !

phillpot

17,119 posts

184 months

Monday 25th July 2016
quotequote all
Le TVR said:
Thanks for that but they are quite different
Yes, because you've got the wrong ones banghead

Le TVR

Original Poster:

3,092 posts

252 months

Tuesday 26th July 2016
quotequote all
phillpot said:
Le TVR said:
Thanks for that but they are quite different
Yes, because you've got the wrong ones banghead
Well I've gone through that website and these ones look identical to the originals that were on the car:

http://tvr-parts.com/tvr-parts/part-details/tvr-03...

magpies said:
Of course every S could be different !
Bingo!

magpies

5,129 posts

183 months

Tuesday 26th July 2016
quotequote all
just below the handbrake you can see one of the exhaust mount brackets (in front of the body mount bracket) - the nearside one is on the hidden part of the chassis.

These require a different mounting style - not bobbins


Griffinr

1,017 posts

175 months

Tuesday 26th July 2016
quotequote all
This is the correct exhaust rubbers for the centre mount, 1 pair each side with through bolt and large section washers top and bottom.

Kitchski

6,516 posts

232 months

Tuesday 26th July 2016
quotequote all
They ARE the correct type of rubber for the car - it's a very early S1. That's what they used to have. They moved to the Nissan-style rubbers used on all S-Series models, as well as Chimaeras and Griffiths later in 1988.

Sorry they've failed Pete. You could adapt it to fit the later type by enlarging the mounting hole to accept the later rubber insert.

greymrj

3,316 posts

205 months

Tuesday 26th July 2016
quotequote all
Definitely NOT mini bobbins! The exhaust is about 5 times as heavy! Sounds like the temporary mod you have made is far more like the originals. The correct arrangement, at each mounting, is a pair of thick annular rings of poly rubber (the originals are rather more dome shaped), one either side of the mounting plate, with an 8mm bolt through, plate washers and an interference thread nut (double nuts is easier). The original TVR part number is S28S10024.

It is fairly easy to get hold of exhaust hanging strap about 6mm thick. Cut and drill 4 pieces (i.e. use two thicknesses) about 30mm square for each side of the exhaust box. Not quite as good as they are a little too rigid but very effective.

Early 2.8 cars had a different mounting, not unlike the mini bobbin in appearance but bigger and stronger with a through bolt with a single rubber cushion bonded round it. Part O35S150A. These were replaced with the, better, later type. As far as I am aware the chassis mountings did not change, only the mounting rubber. As far as I am aware the earlier type is not available althought it is possible it is the same as that used on the earlier 2.8 'wedge' cars.

Kitchski

6,516 posts

232 months

Tuesday 26th July 2016
quotequote all
The chassis mountings only changed as much as the mounting hole on the very early car took an M8 (or whatever the devil-worshipping inchy equivalent!) stud. Most S' obviously use the large bore (18mm I think) hole with the domed rubber inserts and a single M10 bolt passing through with a Nyloc on the end and a couple of penny washers.

On this car (and one other very early S1 I've done) they ran cotton reel-type mounts instead. I assume they switched the design to the Nissan ones as the cotton reel ones tended to sheer off (though hopefully not as early as this!)
These were MGB ones, sourced from an MGB specialist, but converting to the later design might be something I suggest to any customers in the future with the early type. Retro-fitting the later ones into the mount either side of the silencer wouldn't be difficult.

Le TVR

Original Poster:

3,092 posts

252 months

Tuesday 26th July 2016
quotequote all
Thanks everyone, I had offcuts of silcone hoses (8mm hose inside 16mm hose ) cut to create 10mm and 20 mm spacers below and above the exhaust mounts. M8x60 bolts through with nylock nuts and penny washers. Probably close to what TVR did in the end. I can't see these letting go.

greymrj

3,316 posts

205 months

Tuesday 26th July 2016
quotequote all
Kitchski said:
a single M10 bolt passing through with a Nyloc .
Hi Richard, personally I would stick with the M8. Just that this does make it less likely that there will be metal to metal contact, less likely to transmit quite as much 'noise', and provides just a bit more movement if the exhaust takes a bash? scratchchin
Nylocs should indeed be fine instead of the original interference fit nut. Dont think they would get hot enough to melt. I did use a nylock by mistake on a front clamp, nice smell!!!;)

Kitchski

6,516 posts

232 months

Tuesday 26th July 2016
quotequote all
greymrj said:
Hi Richard, personally I would stick with the M8. Just that this does make it less likely that there will be metal to metal contact, less likely to transmit quite as much 'noise', and provides just a bit more movement if the exhaust takes a bash? scratchchin
Nylocs should indeed be fine instead of the original interference fit nut. Dont think they would get hot enough to melt. I did use a nylock by mistake on a front clamp, nice smell!!!;)
Both the rubbers and the brackets TVR fitted are designed for use with M10 bolts, though. If you use a thinner bolt, you run the risk of the rubber 'unseating' at the interface between male and female sides, especially on the S as the rubbers tend to get pulled this way and that.

Nylocs are fine, they don't get anywhere near hot enough to melt.

phillpot

17,119 posts

184 months

Tuesday 26th July 2016
quotequote all
phillpot said:
Le TVR said:
Thanks for that but they are quite different
Yes, because you've got the wrong ones banghead
My apologies for not noticing yours is an early S1, pretty obvious why the "bobbin" type were soon superseded!


Kitchski said:
an M8 (or whatever the devil-worshipping inchy equivalent!) stud.
5/16" unf or unc smile

Kitchski said:
Nylocs are fine, they don't get anywhere near hot enough to melt.
Aerotight if you have any concerns wink