Tell me about MG ZR's

Tell me about MG ZR's

Author
Discussion

NooBish AbbZ

Original Poster:

190 posts

120 months

Sunday 4th January 2015
quotequote all
Been offered one for £950, 45,000 miles, head gasket, timing belt radiator changed last year. Very cheap on autotrader; whats the reason behind this?

wolf1

3,081 posts

250 months

Sunday 4th January 2015
quotequote all
Looks like it's already had it all done so worth a look I'd say.

onyx39

11,123 posts

150 months

Sunday 4th January 2015
quotequote all
NooBish AbbZ said:
Been offered one for £950, 45,000 miles, head gasket, timing belt radiator changed last year. Very cheap on autotrader; whats the reason behind this?
It's an "MG" Rover, so considered by many as "untouchable"

The Mrs drives one, we both love it.

CDP

7,459 posts

254 months

Sunday 4th January 2015
quotequote all
The MGOC in Swavesey use them as courtesy cars. They handle really nicely, I can't see a catch, apart from the cheapish interior but you knew that already.

haddock82

498 posts

138 months

Thursday 22nd January 2015
quotequote all
What year is it?

What engine?

The 1.4 is sloooow!

Handle well for what they are though

Suspension can be a bit harsh

The ZR 160+ is the best of the bunch with the VVC engine, if its all working then they are surprisingly quick little cars

Not a bad car overall if the K-Series is looked after

I've got the ZT with the Turbo K-series in it and its a nice car to drive.

Just gotta save my pennies up to get the ecu upgrade to 204BHP!

onyx39

11,123 posts

150 months

Thursday 22nd January 2015
quotequote all
haddock82 said:
Just gotta save my pennies up to get the ecu upgrade to 204BHP!
z and f?

Ricwin

24 posts

147 months

Thursday 22nd January 2015
quotequote all
Another appealing factor for alot of people is the simplicity of the mechanical parts and design. When something goes wrong with an MG Rover, they're easy and cheap to sort by yourself if you have a basic tool kit and a bit of common sense.
The K Series is brilliant but flawed. The revvy 1.4 16v puts out approx 100bhp and in a small car like the ZR, it can be an absolute riot to drive. Head gasket is an issue, but it can last as long as the car if you let the engine warm up before giving it the beans. The 1.8 and 1.8 VVC are both offer silly amounts of fun-factor for little risk/cost.

anonymous-user

54 months

Saturday 24th January 2015
quotequote all
haddock82 said:
What year is it?

What engine?

The 1.4 is sloooow!

Handle well for what they are though

Suspension can be a bit harsh

The ZR 160+ is the best of the bunch with the VVC engine, if its all working then they are surprisingly quick little cars

Not a bad car overall if the K-Series is looked after

I've got the ZT with the Turbo K-series in it and its a nice car to drive.

Just gotta save my pennies up to get the ecu upgrade to 204BHP!
The 1.4 is slow? Compared to your turbo ZT? Hmm...