F type 340 vs 380 S

F type 340 vs 380 S

Author
Discussion

cooperST2

Original Poster:

53 posts

135 months

Tuesday 27th October 2015
quotequote all
Need some guidance on the above - torque and power curves for both are on absolute par until the upper Rev ranges. Is the Extra 40hp (plus various bits of trim) worth the c.9k premium over the base model?

ruaricoles

1,179 posts

226 months

Thursday 29th October 2015
quotequote all
I'd say yes - the 380 does feel noticeably pokier than the 340; you also get the active exhaust and active dampers and limited slip diff which lift the enjoyment and capability nicely. Have fun either way!

ruaricoles

1,179 posts

226 months

Thursday 29th October 2015
quotequote all
I'd say yes - the 380 does feel noticeably pokier than the 340; you also get the active exhaust and active dampers and limited slip diff which lift the enjoyment and capability nicely. Have fun either way!

anonymous-user

55 months

Friday 30th October 2015
quotequote all
I had an extended test drive in both. My feeling was that, while the 380ps is a bit quicker, the difference wasn't stunning. It was actually the improved suspension and handling that made the difference. The 340ps felt like an old school muscle car, whereas the 380ps felt like a really planted modern sports car.

In the end, I bought a Lotus Evora as it gave me the option of carrying the kids occasionally, but if i'd stuck with the Jag, I think the extra for the 380ps model would have been worth it.

Effjay

327 posts

174 months

Friday 30th October 2015
quotequote all
If it's purely the extra power you want, both models remap to about 400hp (the difference between the 2 engines is software only).

As already mentioned though, it's the extra bits that come with the 380 model which are nice to have.

elementad

625 posts

151 months

Friday 30th October 2015
quotequote all
To be honest, even the touches to the interior trim make it a nice step up (bronzed paddles and switches). The LSD and noticeable extra power are the biggest difference. The sound (the main thing!) with the active exhaust which is standard on the v6S.
V6s also has the ability to adjust set up. Not sure if the standard one has that or not.
If you want the 'go' (performance and set up) aswell as the looks then the v6s (as most reviews will tell you) is the 'sweet spot' in the range.


esso

1,849 posts

218 months

Saturday 31st October 2015
quotequote all
Having just purchased a V6S Coupe I feel qualified to answer this and its Yes. I have driven a V8 TVR Cerbera for the last 10 years so I know a quick car,i drove the 340 and it needed a little bit more. I bought the V6S and wasn`t sure when I bought it if I was going to be impressed by it....but believe me....its impressive and its worth the premium.

cooperST2

Original Poster:

53 posts

135 months

Sunday 1st November 2015
quotequote all
Thanks all, that's helpfull

ftypical

457 posts

119 months

Sunday 1st November 2015
quotequote all
The extra bits are worth having, but not worth £9k. Except for the purposes of Bragging Rights.

Exhaust. The basic exhaust appears to be louder than the dynamic exhaust in the closed setting. It really doesn't need to be louder (you may have trouble on Track Days...)
Torque above 5k. You can feel it, but need to be using big throttle openings to do so.
LSD. The different ratio on this appears to account for most of the extra 'zing' of the S. To get the benefit of the LSD you need to light the tyres up. This is easier in the S due to the previous point, but is pretty damn easy in either model.
Dynamic suspension. Does improve the ride - noticeable better at low speeds, and less bouncy when you're getting a move on. Most other Marques appear to charge less than £2k to add this...
Stereo. Both cars are too loud to be worth spending more money on in this area.
Seats. Wing Back Armchairs in a 'sports car'??? - you get the idea.

Separately, Just Say No to powered tailgates (it's really small, and hides a boot that will not hold enough luggage/shopping to need both hands), and Carbonfibre engine covers (only your mechanic will ever see it, and the first thing they'll do is remove it in order to get at the engine...). Also, if you keep it in a garage, why would you need heated seats and steering wheel? Finally, the cabin is 'compact' - you are unlikely to notice dual zone climate control unless your passenger sets theirs at the opposite end of the dial to yours.


akadk

1,499 posts

180 months

Monday 2nd November 2015
quotequote all
ftypical said:
The extra bits are worth having, but not worth £9k. Except for the purposes of Bragging Rights.

Exhaust. The basic exhaust appears to be louder than the dynamic exhaust in the closed setting. It really doesn't need to be louder (you may have trouble on Track Days...)
Torque above 5k. You can feel it, but need to be using big throttle openings to do so.
LSD. The different ratio on this appears to account for most of the extra 'zing' of the S. To get the benefit of the LSD you need to light the tyres up. This is easier in the S due to the previous point, but is pretty damn easy in either model.
Dynamic suspension. Does improve the ride - noticeable better at low speeds, and less bouncy when you're getting a move on. Most other Marques appear to charge less than £2k to add this...
Stereo. Both cars are too loud to be worth spending more money on in this area.
Seats. Wing Back Armchairs in a 'sports car'??? - you get the idea.

Separately, Just Say No to powered tailgates (it's really small, and hides a boot that will not hold enough luggage/shopping to need both hands), and Carbonfibre engine covers (only your mechanic will ever see it, and the first thing they'll do is remove it in order to get at the engine...). Also, if you keep it in a garage, why would you need heated seats and steering wheel? Finally, the cabin is 'compact' - you are unlikely to notice dual zone climate control unless your passenger sets theirs at the opposite end of the dial to yours.
That's the most ridiculous argument ever.

Basically just go for a boggo standard car...tbh I'm surprised you didn't go the whole hog and say no need for seats at all, just put the kitchen stool in!

a8hex

5,830 posts

224 months

Tuesday 3rd November 2015
quotequote all
ftypical said:
Also, if you keep it in a garage, why would you need heated seats and steering wheel?
Well the lady in my life loves her heated seats, whether the car lives in a garage or not. In a tin top I use mine less, but it's still nice occasionally, if you've the open top then the heated seat makes driving with the lid down out of summer a much more comfortable affair. I wish the heated steering wheel on my XKR had different settings, I normally find it too warm and have been known to turn it on and off at intervals balance that out, I suppose I could always get a pair of string back driving gloves biglaugh

esso

1,849 posts

218 months

Tuesday 3rd November 2015
quotequote all
wink.....how often do you use the Willy warmer?.....

a8hex

5,830 posts

224 months

Tuesday 3rd November 2015
quotequote all
esso said:
;).....how often do you use the Willy warmer?.....
That's really no way to refer to...

Actually when I bought the car the drivers side seat heater wasn't working. I didn't notice for ages then I had a bright spring morning drive down to CKL and soon found that at motorway speeds you getting pretty cold in skirt sleeves even with the heater on full. No problems getting the seat fixed under warrantee now I can blast around topless on cold morning with no problems. Only wish is that as well as levels 1,2 & 3 there was a 1/2 setting too.

ftypical

457 posts

119 months

Tuesday 3rd November 2015
quotequote all
akadk said:
That's the most ridiculous argument ever.

Basically just go for a boggo standard car...tbh I'm surprised you didn't go the whole hog and say no need for seats at all, just put the kitchen stool in!
The wing backs are an acquired taste, And so heavy they take two mechanics to lift them out. In a "sports" car...

As I note at the start, most of the extras in the S are worth having, so buy second hand and don't pay extra for them.

esso

1,849 posts

218 months

Tuesday 3rd November 2015
quotequote all
ftypical said:
akadk said:
That's the most ridiculous argument ever.

Basically just go for a boggo standard car...tbh I'm surprised you didn't go the whole hog and say no need for seats at all, just put the kitchen stool in!
The wing backs are an acquired taste, And so heavy they take two mechanics to lift them out. In a "sports" car...

As I note at the start, most of the extras in the S are worth having, so buy second hand and don't pay extra for them.
The V6S I bought was `pre-owned`.. its a 14 plate car with 5300 miles on with 7k worth of options on and I got it for 14.5k less then a new one....so I agree, buy a second hand one.

cooperST2

Original Poster:

53 posts

135 months

Wednesday 4th November 2015
quotequote all
PCP on a new one with a discount works out somewhat cheaper than a used one 15k cheaper....says a lot about residuals

esso

1,849 posts

218 months

Thursday 5th November 2015
quotequote all
That's fine if you want to purchase a car on PCP resulting in a large balloon payment at the end of it.........I didn`t.