VW Engines and Timing Belts - an idiot's question

VW Engines and Timing Belts - an idiot's question

Author
Discussion

Pints

Original Poster:

18,444 posts

194 months

Monday 24th October 2011
quotequote all
I mentioned to my FiL that I was glad to have got round to replacing the cambelt on my Golf, since I wasn't too keen on my valves meeting my pistons should the belt fail.

He said this doens't happen on Volkswagens, and it's just a case of popping on a new belt once you've got the markings aligned again.

Any truth in this? How/why would VW make an engine allegedly immune to such catastrophe but Vauxhall don't?

Deerfoot

4,902 posts

184 months

Monday 24th October 2011
quotequote all
Pints said:
He said this doesn't happen on Volkswagens,
He is incorrect.

Pints

Original Poster:

18,444 posts

194 months

Monday 24th October 2011
quotequote all
Was it true for the old 4cyl air-cooled engines?

(Love the idea that the FiL is wrong though) biggrin

Deva Link

26,934 posts

245 months

Monday 24th October 2011
quotequote all
I'm pretty sure all VW engines (for years) are "interference" - ie the pistons will hit the valves if the cambelt breaks.

I would imagine this is particularly so on a diesel, as the compression ratio is higher than a petrol.

Maybe there's a list somewhere of interference and non-interference VW engines?

Pints

Original Poster:

18,444 posts

194 months

Monday 24th October 2011
quotequote all
Deva Link said:
interference and non-interference
Useful. I didn't know these terms.
I've found some good stuff on Google using this in the search.

It seem that the TDI is most certainly an interference engine, and even the FSI and TFSI engines are interference since at least 2003.

Edit: also noted that non-interference engines are also known as "free running"

Edited by Pints on Monday 24th October 20:19

Tame Technician

2,467 posts

204 months

Monday 24th October 2011
quotequote all
The 1.6 8 valve engine in the A3's is the only one where you could get away with a broken belt not doing any damage.

Dr G

15,173 posts

242 months

Tuesday 25th October 2011
quotequote all
Pints said:
Edit: also noted that non-interference engines are also known as "free running"
Isn't free running parkour?

Nick3point2

3,917 posts

180 months

Tuesday 25th October 2011
quotequote all
Dr G said:
Pints said:
Edit: also noted that non-interference engines are also known as "free running"
Isn't free running parkour?
hehe

Pints

Original Poster:

18,444 posts

194 months

Tuesday 25th October 2011
quotequote all
Nick3point2 said:
Dr G said:
Pints said:
Edit: also noted that non-interference engines are also known as "free running"
Isn't free running parkour?
hehe
I had to google that.

Tit. wink

JB!

5,254 posts

180 months

Wednesday 26th October 2011
quotequote all
technically interference engines, some worse than others, the old 8v lumps which although interference, you have to be really unlucky to actually damage anything when the belt goes.

Who me ?

7,455 posts

212 months

Thursday 27th October 2011
quotequote all
Deva Link said:
I'm pretty sure all VW engines (for years) are "interference" - ie the pistons will hit the valves if the cambelt breaks.

I would imagine this is particularly so on a diesel, as the compression ratio is higher than a petrol.

Maybe there's a list somewhere of interference and non-interference VW engines?
Possibly might be worth mentioning that VW might be better replaced with VAG-Can someone confirm that ?

NBirkitt

252 posts

191 months

Thursday 27th October 2011
quotequote all
Pints said:
Was it true for the old 4cyl air-cooled engines?
The old air-cooled VW engines were all overhead valve / pushrod engines, no cambelt required ...


thebugmon

1 posts

114 months

Friday 17th October 2014
quotequote all
To my knowledge, all of the VW water cooled, 8 valve, gasoline, engines, from the 1.5L to the 1.7L are Non Interference. I was a VW mechanic in the 80s, and have owned many VWs and have broken belts and had tensioners fail. I have never seen one bend valves. The Diesel is another story, they are definitely interference. I do not know about the 1.8L, or anything newer.

Dr G

15,173 posts

242 months

Saturday 18th October 2014
quotequote all
A) Welcome to Pistonheads.

B) How on earth did you find a thread that old? laugh