How to avoid excessive oil usage cars?

How to avoid excessive oil usage cars?

Author
Discussion

Deerfoot

4,901 posts

184 months

Wednesday 11th February 2015
quotequote all
Dr G said:
B8 cars so A4, A5 & Q5 with the longitudinal 2.0T.
Slight thread drift here.....

So the 1.8T engine doesn't suffer the same problem?

I've found a nice B8 A4 avant with the 1.8 TFSI unit (160bhp). Anything specific on these I need to check?

silentbrown

8,823 posts

116 months

Wednesday 11th February 2015
quotequote all
Deerfoot said:
So the 1.8T engine doesn't suffer the same problem?

I've found a nice B8 A4 avant with the 1.8 TFSI unit (160bhp). Anything specific on these I need to check?
No. 1.8 doesn't have the problem.

Only thing to check is how much more fun the 2.0 is to drive...

Deerfoot

4,901 posts

184 months

Wednesday 11th February 2015
quotequote all
silentbrown said:
Only thing to check is how much more fun the 2.0 is to drive...
I`m sure it`s more fun but if I can avoid oil consumption issues it might be a decent option. It`ll be my first petrol car for around 7 years.

The car I`ve found has a decent spec and appears to be in good condition. I`ll of course try both variants out.

PositronicRay

27,006 posts

183 months

Wednesday 11th February 2015
quotequote all
I rate the 1.8T engine. Smooth and revvy, and doesn't suffer the same torque steer problems as the FWD 2.0T unit

Deerfoot

4,901 posts

184 months

Wednesday 11th February 2015
quotequote all
PositronicRay said:
I rate the 1.8T engine. Smooth and revvy, and doesn't suffer the same torque steer problems as the FWD 2.0T unit
This is partly my thinking. I`m willing to sacrifice some grunt, especially if it`s more refined.

rongagin

Original Poster:

481 posts

136 months

Wednesday 11th February 2015
quotequote all
As the OP I can say the 1.8 TFSI (160) is a nice engine in a A3. In a A4 Avant it may be a bit down on power? I haven't driven one so can't comment, Audi do plenty of 120 bhp 1.8s in the Avant so the 160 might be ok? As a bonus the 1.8 is more economical, as expected, probably only by a few mpg.

Btw I have read threads where 1.8 TFSI engines have had excessive oil usage, but rare compared to the 2.0 TFSI in the north south configuration.

silentbrown

8,823 posts

116 months

Wednesday 11th February 2015
quotequote all
Hopefully a bit of feedback that may be useful:

My '09 65K A4 2.0 has today successfully "failed" the first part of Audi's oil consumption test, with the electronic gauge showing about 900ml used in 650 miles. The next step requires an ECU update, and - I think - breather valve replacement, then I get to repeat the test. If that one also fails it's time for pistons and rings.

The good news is that I've been told this will be 100% covered by Audi. No contribution required from me. (Cost to me so far, zero. I've also had two free top-up litres of oil, the usual car wash after each visit, and some pretty drinkable coffee...)

While Audi haven't officially fessed up to anything, I was told that "there is a new procedure from Audi", and "they are handling this differently now". The service history of the car was carefully checked before the 'offer' was made. (mine was bought approved used from a different dealer, but has been serviced by this dealership for the last 3 years.) This seems to be key to the 'goodwill'.

No customer contribution, no haggling with Audi customer service: I'm a happy bunny.

(Full Disclosure: 99% sure that service dept didn't know I was putting deposit down for a new S4 while they were working on the car... So in a few months my car will up for sale anyway!)





silentbrown

8,823 posts

116 months

Friday 27th February 2015
quotequote all
silentbrown said:
The next step requires an ECU update, and - I think - breather valve replacement
Car was in today for software update and vacuum unit(?) replacement, as part #1 of the fix.

No charge : Collected, delivered, washed (inevitably) and with a complimentary MOT on top. I now have to do another 600+ miles to see if it's fixed the problem.

silentbrown

8,823 posts

116 months

Tuesday 17th March 2015
quotequote all
silentbrown said:
Car was in today for software update and vacuum unit(?) replacement, as part #1 of the fix.
I now have to do another 600+ miles to see if it's fixed the problem.
Short answer: No, it didn't!

Long answer: MMI gauge didn't budge for 400 miles, then started dropping at its usual rate. So I suspect it was filled a little high to give me more range before the light came on... Booked in for pistons and rings next month, and awaiting final confirmation on costs.

The conversation with cheery and helpful service advisor was a little underwhelming, though:

Him: Your car has failed by the consumption test by "0.2" so needs new pistons and rings.
Me: OK. Can I see the exact result of the test?
Him: I don't have that. but it failed by "0.2"
Me: "0.2 whats??" (Litres per mile, gallons per fortnight, olympic-swimming-pools per country-the-size-of-wales? - OK, I didn't say that bit...)
Him: Oh. Well they weigh the oil, so it must be (... deep thought...) grams - It failed by 0.2 grams!

I guess that explains why he's not a master technician...



Crafty_

13,279 posts

200 months

Tuesday 17th March 2015
quotequote all
He will have followed a procedure in tech documents and its what the computer has told him.. great hey.

Incidentally I understand there is another round of this problem with later A4s and A5s, different cause I think, book time for strip & rebuild is 22 hours, my mate recons he's got it down to half that, simply from having done so many.... Impressed ? he most certainly isn't !

silentbrown

8,823 posts

116 months

Tuesday 17th March 2015
quotequote all
Crafty_ said:
He will have followed a procedure in tech documents and its what the computer has told him..
No 'procedure to follow', I think. This was just the front-of-house "service advisor". The technician actually working on the car knows his stuff, and know I'd have got a proper answer if I'd asked him!

silentbrown

8,823 posts

116 months

Tuesday 17th March 2015
quotequote all
Crafty_ said:
book time for strip & rebuild is 22 hours, my mate recons he's got it down to half that
Slowcoach... 3 Mins 44 seconds is the time to beat! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oiysSiZdeIE

Can you ask if he knows why they also change conrods on some engines to fix this? Seems odd to me.

Dr G

15,167 posts

242 months

Tuesday 17th March 2015
quotequote all
I'm guessing they come in from Audi pre-assembled.

Crafty_

13,279 posts

200 months

Tuesday 17th March 2015
quotequote all
silentbrown said:
Slowcoach... 3 Mins 44 seconds is the time to beat! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oiysSiZdeIE

Can you ask if he knows why they also change conrods on some engines to fix this? Seems odd to me.
hehe I'll send him that.

I'm not sure if they do come pre-assembled, they don't in that video. I will ask.




Crafty_

13,279 posts

200 months

Wednesday 18th March 2015
quotequote all
Apparently the new pistons use a gudgeon pin that has a larger diameter, hence the new rods.

He's done an A5 cab this week with the same problem...


silentbrown

8,823 posts

116 months

Wednesday 18th March 2015
quotequote all
Crafty_ said:
Apparently the new pistons use a gudgeon pin that has a larger diameter, hence the new rods.
That would do it. Never seen a gudgeon pin fail, though. Wonder why they changed them?

Crafty_

13,279 posts

200 months

Wednesday 18th March 2015
quotequote all
I don't know, the oil consumption problems are (still) with rings I believe.

It could be as simple as a manufacturer offered a cheaper, different piston that just so happened to have a bigger pin.