Alternative Rear Lights

Alternative Rear Lights

Author
Discussion

hillclimbmanic

Original Poster:

612 posts

144 months

Monday 22nd August 2016
quotequote all
I don't know if any of you remember me buying the Lexus-style lights, with the tint film?
Anyway, I've removed the film, and they look MUCH better(In MY opinion, at least.!)

What's the general opinion, given that I've uprated the fronts to the Sportmotive 7" kit ??


Jurgen Schmidt

824 posts

201 months

Monday 22nd August 2016
quotequote all
Any pics of it on the car?

I am debating whether to change mine, I saw a Griff at Str8six over the weekend that has the 4 small round lights, and I really like it.

I've done a mock up to help make it more visual on my own car...

I've no idea who is able to do the conversion for me though

Currently...


Possible..?




MPO

264 posts

112 months

Monday 22nd August 2016
quotequote all
Mine are still the standard ones.

I have considered these in the past but would rather have the originals completely tinted…

MPO

Edited by MPO on Monday 22 August 10:24

RichB

51,565 posts

284 months

Monday 22nd August 2016
quotequote all
Each to their own of course. In my opinion the originals work best with the design of the car: i) The way they are rebated into the edge of the wing reflects the scalloped edge of the doors and the leading edge of the bonnet, thus you have this unique TVR feature at the front, sides and rear of the car. ii) The shut line of the boot lid continue down through the inner edge of the lamp cover. iii) The somewhat bluff rear end of the Griff needs the bold rear lamps to add interest. The "pepper pot" lamps are too small to make a statement and do not complement any other feature of the car (they were taken from the Tuscan which of course uses the design idea of holes for lamps front & rear).

hillclimbmanic

Original Poster:

612 posts

144 months

Monday 22nd August 2016
quotequote all
The car is currently going through a complete restoration, so it's still in a million pieces.!!

The rear lights with the 4 small lights, are from the SE...I'm not a big fan of those; I agree that they detract from the overall aesthetics...The ones that I've got, are aftermarket Vauxhall lights, the same pattern as the original Griff's

These are the Lexus lights on another Griff...



These are the SE lights...




Edited by hillclimbmanic on Monday 22 August 13:47

macar

378 posts

170 months

Monday 22nd August 2016
quotequote all
Pepper pots for me everytime

hillclimbmanic

Original Poster:

612 posts

144 months

Monday 22nd August 2016
quotequote all
macar said:
Pepper pots for me everytime
I prefer them blended in like this!

bluezeeland

1,965 posts

159 months

Monday 22nd August 2016
quotequote all
On my ocean haze car, I've change the clusters to the smoked version of the originals, which IMO looks better, the non tinted are gathering dust in the garage, if any one is interested ?

griffdude

1,824 posts

248 months

Tuesday 23rd August 2016
quotequote all
If you like the Lexus style, go ahead, but personally I think they've dated really quickly. IMHO, the original smoked rear lights look the best. If you do change them, it might be an idea to make it that they can be easilly returned to a standard look if need be.

Rob_the_Sparky

1,000 posts

238 months

Tuesday 23rd August 2016
quotequote all
The smoked ones are from the Mk3 GSi Cavalier rather than the boggo one and they are almost as hard to find as hen's teeth...

hillclimbmanic

Original Poster:

612 posts

144 months

Tuesday 23rd August 2016
quotequote all
griffdude said:
If you like the Lexus style, go ahead, but personally I think they've dated really quickly. IMHO, the original smoked rear lights look the best. If you do change them, it might be an idea to make it that they can be easilly returned to a standard look if need be.
They just bolt in place...They are for a Cavalier, just like the Griff's are.!!!!

macdeb

8,509 posts

255 months

Tuesday 23rd August 2016
quotequote all
Standard is best on rear of a Griffith IMHO [you did ask]

Barreti

6,680 posts

237 months

Tuesday 23rd August 2016
quotequote all
dont do it. Honestly, they look kind of passable on a Corsa/Fiesta/19yrs olds stbox but for a classic car they look pants.

Speed 3

4,560 posts

119 months

Tuesday 23rd August 2016
quotequote all
macdeb said:
Standard is best on rear of a Griffith IMHO (you did ask)
+1

I really don't understand the desire to mess around with a design classic. TVR fell into the usual run-out model cosmetic fettling trap on the SE which just doesn't work. If I bought one of those that was like that from build, I'd revert it straight away. Its not like the original Griff (or Chim for that matter) shout "donor", TVR did a great job of picking an off the shelf uncommon item and designing a car around it. Pepperpots belong on Tuscans and Tamoras just as the blended fascia lights on the T350 & Sag only work well for those shapes.


Argent

478 posts

241 months

Thursday 25th August 2016
quotequote all
I agree, I don't like the dash or the wings mirrors on the SE"s either, it was for very good reasons that the Griffith won a Design Council award when it came out.

A

Speed 3 said:
macdeb said:
Standard is best on rear of a Griffith IMHO (you did ask)
+1

I really don't understand the desire to mess around with a design classic. TVR fell into the usual run-out model cosmetic fettling trap on the SE which just doesn't work. If I bought one of those that was like that from build, I'd revert it straight away. Its not like the original Griff (or Chim for that matter) shout "donor", TVR did a great job of picking an off the shelf uncommon item and designing a car around it. Pepperpots belong on Tuscans and Tamoras just as the blended fascia lights on the T350 & Sag only work well for those shapes.

portzi

2,296 posts

175 months

Thursday 25th August 2016
quotequote all
Argent said:
I agree, I don't like the dash or the wings mirrors on the SE"s either, it was for very good reasons that the Griffith won a Design Council award when it came out.

A

Speed 3 said:
macdeb said:
Standard is best on rear of a Griffith IMHO (you did ask)
+1

I really don't understand the desire to mess around with a design classic. TVR fell into the usual run-out model cosmetic fettling trap on the SE which just doesn't work. If I bought one of those that was like that from build, I'd revert it straight away. Its not like the original Griff (or Chim for that matter) shout "donor", TVR did a great job of picking an off the shelf uncommon item and designing a car around it. Pepperpots belong on Tuscans and Tamoras just as the blended fascia lights on the T350 & Sag only work well for those shapes.
The SE Griff, is in the same boat as the MK3 Chimaera, full of parts bin accessories and left overs from other models smile. No real styling involved just TVR using up stock, or having run out of original parts smile waste not want not.

PeteGriff

1,262 posts

157 months

Thursday 25th August 2016
quotequote all
Barreti said:
dont do it. Honestly, they look kind of passable on a Corsa/Fiesta/19yrs olds stbox but for a classic car they look pants.
Ditto. It may be 'old git' talking, but the simple originals suit the car, otherwise it starts to look as Ian said - Corsa/Fiesta. Thats my personal opinion.

MPO

264 posts

112 months

Friday 26th August 2016
quotequote all
Different:-

https://www.flickr.com/photos/94784469@N04/8637616...

Not sure wha to make of them!

MPO

RichB

51,565 posts

284 months

Friday 26th August 2016
quotequote all
MPO said:
Different:-

https://www.flickr.com/photos/94784469@N04/8637616...

Not sure wha to make of them!

MPO
Woefully bad that's what to make of them ! vomit

GlynMo

1,140 posts

249 months

Friday 26th August 2016
quotequote all
RichB said:
MPO said:
Different:-

https://www.flickr.com/photos/94784469@N04/8637616...

Not sure wha to make of them!

MPO
Woefully bad that's what to make of them ! vomit
+1