Land Rover Defender 90 as family car?

Land Rover Defender 90 as family car?

Author
Discussion

phn

Original Poster:

335 posts

243 months

Saturday 20th September 2014
quotequote all
Considering a Land Rover defender 90 2.4 (with the forward facing rear seats).

Just wondering how practical this option is as a family car for 2 adults and 2 children ages 11 and 8, and how much space is left for cargo when the back seats are occupied?

If anyone has experience of this, please let me know!

Thanks!

xuy

1,116 posts

154 months

Saturday 20th September 2014
quotequote all
No, it will not work, get a 110 if you want it as a family car.


BLUETHUNDER

7,881 posts

260 months

Saturday 20th September 2014
quotequote all
Agreed. I tried it with a 50th Anniversary. Their was just no room for any luggage.

anonymous-user

54 months

Sunday 21st September 2014
quotequote all
Or get a Sankey trailer to go with it.

Simes110

768 posts

151 months

Sunday 21st September 2014
quotequote all
I've not owned a 90, but I have plenty of friends who do.

From what I gather, you take kids and fit the luggage around them or you buy a roof rack or a trailer.

My own experience with owning a 110 for nearly 10 years (and having two children) suggests this is by far the more practicable option.

phn

Original Poster:

335 posts

243 months

Sunday 21st September 2014
quotequote all
Thanks for the replies!

Yep, think the 110 will be better, or possibly a discovery.

There's just something nice about the defender though - hard to say what it is!

anonymous-user

54 months

Sunday 21st September 2014
quotequote all
Think long and hard about what you plan to do with it and how often you'll actually fill the car before going down the 110 route.
The 90 + trailer/roof rack option might make more sense depending how often you plan to take everything and the kitchen sink with you, versus hauling a 110 about the place with the rear load area empty a lot of the time. Turning circle for example - Saturn moves in a tighter orbit. If it's gonna be just you and the kids cutting about locally I'd go with the little 'un.

Neezer

391 posts

228 months

Sunday 21st September 2014
quotequote all
I have a 90 with the 2.4 puma, forward facing seats. Basically you can either take people or luggage. There really isn't much room at all when you have rear passengers... you may literally have room for a few carrier bags stuffed behind the seats, but then you'll have to remove them before the passengers get out as that is where the door is.

Glideman

60 posts

185 months

Sunday 21st September 2014
quotequote all
You'll need another big car for when the land rover breaks down!

anonymous-user

54 months

Sunday 21st September 2014
quotequote all
Glideman said:
You'll need another big car for when the land rover breaks down!
Nurse! Nurse! Make him stop! I'm laughing so much it hurts!
rolleyes

anonymous-user

54 months

Monday 22nd September 2014
quotequote all
We have a 110 as our family bus. A 90 would be ok most of the time for 3 to 4 plus dog, but no good when you want to take a friend, bikes, beach stuff or luggage. That rules one out for us and it's actually useful to be able to drop all the seats and fill it with garden waste when you need to.

My top tip would be not to get one with carpets. My son's friend dropped a large coke in the back a couple of weeks ago and was horrified. No problem, as most of it just ran out under the door, but the rest was hosed out once home.

The turning circle is bad, but you get used to it. You do have to really want a Defender though as realistically it's going to do 25-26mpg, need expensive servicing with more care and attention than a regular car and is not remotely quiet or comfortable on a long trip.

Fish

3,976 posts

282 months

Tuesday 23rd September 2014
quotequote all
I have a 90 2.2... It will not work as a family wagon you need a 110SW or 110USW. There is just not enought space.. a 110 is only 450mm longer so no real biggie. Although I still wonder whether I should change.

Davel

8,982 posts

258 months

Tuesday 23rd September 2014
quotequote all
Got to agree.

Have had two but have older kids and they hated being crammed in the back.

As others say, seats up for luggage or down for kids - not much room for both.

I really like them but my family didn't.

bakerstreet

4,763 posts

165 months

Wednesday 24th September 2014
quotequote all
Crossflow Kid said:
Turning circle for example - Saturn moves in a tighter orbit. If it's gonna be just you and the kids cutting about locally I'd go with the little 'un.
Genuine lol at that comment. We have recently had gates installed and its pretty much knackered any plans I had of getting a 110 purley because it would take an 22 point turn to get it out of my driveway!



anonymous-user

54 months

Wednesday 24th September 2014
quotequote all
bakerstreet said:
a 110 purley
Is that some kind of posh Surrey-themed limited edition?

philcray

846 posts

203 months

Wednesday 24th September 2014
quotequote all
Another option is to get a slightly older one with the 6 seat configuration. I have a 56 reg and 3 kids, you can fit a fair bit of stuff in the back, especially if there are only 2 of the seats being used and you fold the others up.

The downside is that usable top speed is about 60mph and you need kids who are not prone to travel sickness....

anonymous-user

54 months

Wednesday 24th September 2014
quotequote all
philcray said:
The downside is that usable top speed is about 60mph
YOu need to drop a Disco transfer box in to it and blank off the EGR....
Behold! The Defender Sport!