90 Defender Daily?
Discussion
Evening gents,my first venture into this part of PH!
I currently have a focus rs as a daily drive (2003) and have wondered about taking it off the road to keep for best and getting a 90...why?
My father had a 110 years ago and I just loved the rawness/down to earth appeal..
Seems like it would be a good daily drive? I do 40miles a day,and would be good if we had major snow again,don't want to go fast just want one becuase I can,they look hard as nails and will be a good workhorse!
Am I mad?
I currently have a focus rs as a daily drive (2003) and have wondered about taking it off the road to keep for best and getting a 90...why?
My father had a 110 years ago and I just loved the rawness/down to earth appeal..
Seems like it would be a good daily drive? I do 40miles a day,and would be good if we had major snow again,don't want to go fast just want one becuase I can,they look hard as nails and will be a good workhorse!
Am I mad?
I had a defender a few months ago, they are slow noisy let water in, rust a lot, have clunky transmission and generally leak oil from some place or other. However they have charachter, keep their value very well, are cheap to fix and are good off road. If the plus sides off set the negatives why not get one. Pesonally though I've sold mine and bought a more parctical (bad choice of words) isuzu trooper commercial. I've done this as I do far to many miles to be deafend by an old landrover but need something I can through the muddy gun dog in the back of and or drive a 200 mile round trip to pick a set of wheels up for my caterham in, I could only really have done 1 of these in my old defender but did both yesterday in my trooper. ps this isnt a post slating land rovers and I dont want to start the land rover/jap debate again as i dont doubt thats been done to death on here jsut stating my personal experience.
pikeyboy said:
I had a defender a few months ago, they are slow noisy let water in, rust a lot, have clunky transmission and generally leak oil from some place or other. However they have charachter, keep their value very well, are cheap to fix and are good off road. If the plus sides off set the negatives why not get one. Pesonally though I've sold mine and bought a more parctical (bad choice of words) isuzu trooper commercial. I've done this as I do far to many miles to be deafend by an old landrover but need something I can through the muddy gun dog in the back of and or drive a 200 mile round trip to pick a set of wheels up for my caterham in, I could only really have done 1 of these in my old defender but did both yesterday in my trooper. ps this isnt a post slating land rovers and I dont want to start the land rover/jap debate again as i dont doubt thats been done to death on here jsut stating my personal experience.
I never had any of those problems with my 50th. No clunking from the tranny. Smooth changes from the autobox.And could cruise all day at 100mph. Great vehicle.BLUETHUNDER said:
pikeyboy said:
I had a defender a few months ago, they are slow noisy let water in, rust a lot, have clunky transmission and generally leak oil from some place or other. However they have charachter, keep their value very well, are cheap to fix and are good off road. If the plus sides off set the negatives why not get one. Pesonally though I've sold mine and bought a more parctical (bad choice of words) isuzu trooper commercial. I've done this as I do far to many miles to be deafend by an old landrover but need something I can through the muddy gun dog in the back of and or drive a 200 mile round trip to pick a set of wheels up for my caterham in, I could only really have done 1 of these in my old defender but did both yesterday in my trooper. ps this isnt a post slating land rovers and I dont want to start the land rover/jap debate again as i dont doubt thats been done to death on here jsut stating my personal experience.
I never had any of those problems with my 50th. No clunking from the tranny. Smooth changes from the autobox.And could cruise all day at 100mph. Great vehicle.pikeyboy said:
BLUETHUNDER said:
pikeyboy said:
I had a defender a few months ago, they are slow noisy let water in, rust a lot, have clunky transmission and generally leak oil from some place or other. However they have charachter, keep their value very well, are cheap to fix and are good off road. If the plus sides off set the negatives why not get one. Pesonally though I've sold mine and bought a more parctical (bad choice of words) isuzu trooper commercial. I've done this as I do far to many miles to be deafend by an old landrover but need something I can through the muddy gun dog in the back of and or drive a 200 mile round trip to pick a set of wheels up for my caterham in, I could only really have done 1 of these in my old defender but did both yesterday in my trooper. ps this isnt a post slating land rovers and I dont want to start the land rover/jap debate again as i dont doubt thats been done to death on here jsut stating my personal experience.
I never had any of those problems with my 50th. No clunking from the tranny. Smooth changes from the autobox.And could cruise all day at 100mph. Great vehicle.The next Defender will be a Puma XS. Been quite impressed with the performance and the finish inside.
AshBaldry said:
What is the 300tdi? I don't know much about the engines
Avoid the TurboD(1985-1990) unless it's very cheap or has had Allard style modifications. Slow and unreliable, especially if thrashed; DAMHIKT.200tdi(1990-1994) good and reliable if looked after, but still quite noisy.
300tdi(1994-?) as the 200 but slightly more power and quieter.
Whatever you buy, check when it's had a cambelt change(I think the interval is 40k or something); if there's no record get it changed as it's cheaper than a new engine.
I know nowt about the TD5 so will leave that to others to comment on.
Gassing Station | Land Rover | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff