Disgruntled employee
Discussion
Officially stopped working, or officially stopped going into the office and is on notice or garden leave? What I'm trying to get to is, are the assets still owed, or is she pulling a fast one and being evasive for another reason rather than getting the full benefit of something that was part of her job
Making an assumption here....
She has a company car, she is no longer an employee. Therefore id guess she's no insured to drive it any more?
Ring cops... car stolen and being driven by an uninsured driver.
job done
don't forget to give her a glowing reference :-)
She has a company car, she is no longer an employee. Therefore id guess she's no insured to drive it any more?
Ring cops... car stolen and being driven by an uninsured driver.
job done
don't forget to give her a glowing reference :-)
Edited by 528Sport on Wednesday 15th April 16:29
allergictocheese said:
Stop with all the Police stuff. It's not theft because there was no dishonest appropriation and intent to permanently deprive would be hard to overcome.
It's a civil matter.
Without trying to kick off a massive PH bun fight I have to ask, exactly what are the Police for?It's a civil matter.
Getragdogleg said:
allergictocheese said:
Stop with all the Police stuff. It's not theft because there was no dishonest appropriation and intent to permanently deprive would be hard to overcome.
It's a civil matter.
Without trying to kick off a massive PH bun fight I have to ask, exactly what are the Police for?It's a civil matter.
It is a police matter. Also the fact somebody is probably driving while uninsured as no longer an employee, is also a police matter.
Getragdogleg said:
allergictocheese said:
Stop with all the Police stuff. It's not theft because there was no dishonest appropriation and intent to permanently deprive would be hard to overcome.
It's a civil matter.
Without trying to kick off a massive PH bun fight I have to ask, exactly what are the Police for?It's a civil matter.
king clue what he's on about 
allergictocheese said:
Stop with all the Police stuff. It's not theft because there was no dishonest appropriation and intent to permanently deprive would be hard to overcome.
It's a civil matter.
What exactly do you think Taken Without Consent is?It's a civil matter.
If she has been told to return the items, has been give ample opportunity to do so but reuses, then that IS a police matter, it's just no an emergency, hence the advice to ring a none 999 number
KrazyIvan said:
What exactly do you think Taken Without Consent is?
If she has been told to return the items, has been give ample opportunity to do so but reuses, then that IS a police matter, it's just no an emergency, hence the advice to ring a none 999 number
It's the bit where the woman was granted use of the car that'll make things sticky, the removing of that agreement means she should return them within a reasonable timeframe, it's just that reasonable to the OP and reasonable to the ex employee seem to be different. If she has been told to return the items, has been give ample opportunity to do so but reuses, then that IS a police matter, it's just no an emergency, hence the advice to ring a none 999 number
There's no evidence that she's driving the car around, it could well be tucked up in her new garage and she wants to get the house unpacked. More likely though to me, she's using it to get to interviews for a new job, seeing as the old one knocked her back, the mindset will be to make full use of what she can before handing it back.
PurpleMoonlight said:
It's not been taken though, it was willingly given but has not returned.
It is a civil matter in Law and the police won't be interested.
It's been all too long since I studied criminal law, but I thought that once a given item has been asked for back (which wasn't a gift) the person is then treating it as their own and falls into theft.It is a civil matter in Law and the police won't be interested.
Gassing Station | Business | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff