Contracting rates and take home pay

Contracting rates and take home pay

Author
Discussion

trooperiziz

Original Poster:

9,456 posts

253 months

Tuesday 9th January 2007
quotequote all
Afternoon

I'm considering making the jump from permanent to contracting, but I'm not entirely sure how to work out my monthly net pay so I can compare effectively.

Assuming I'm going for a £350 daily rate, what will that work out to be as a net monthly wage? The prosperity4 calculator thinks around £4400 with a £400 pension contribution, but doesn't give any figures as to how that was worked out.

Anybody got a good formula that takes everything into account, or isn't it that simple?

As an aside, anybody used Prosperity4 and have any comments on them?

Eric Mc

122,110 posts

266 months

Tuesday 9th January 2007
quotequote all
It depends on how you are planning on operating and whether IR35 is an issue.

trooperiziz

Original Poster:

9,456 posts

253 months

Tuesday 9th January 2007
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
It depends on how you are planning on operating and whether IR35 is an issue.


Just dipping my toe in the contracting market at the moment. Bog standard software development project work contracts for large companies in the city, probably lasting around 6-12 months at a time. My original idea was to go through an umbrella company to start with to see if the contracting world is something I'm into.

JohnSW20

886 posts

238 months

Tuesday 9th January 2007
quotequote all
Hi Trooper

If you want to e-mail through my profile I'll talk through the illustration you have an explain how it works.

John

Plotloss

67,280 posts

271 months

Tuesday 9th January 2007
quotequote all
Rough calculation

Take your hourly, double it, add three zeros

So £50 per hour on a 40 hour week roughly equates to £100K

Then work out tax as per normal salary.

If your contract is IR35 friendly the tax will be significantly less overall though.

Eric Mc

122,110 posts

266 months

Tuesday 9th January 2007
quotequote all
Even the umbrella company route can throw up wildly differing scenarios.

It depends on whether the umbrella company operates in a consrervative fashion and applies straight PAYE and National Insurance to your earnings. In those circumstances, your take home pay will be very similar to what it would be if you were a "normal" employee.

If the umbrella company is more "adventurous", it may treat the contractor as a shareholder and pay on the basis of salary and/or dividends. This will generally result in a better take home pay situation.
However, this whole area is being put under the microscope by HM Revenue and Customs and new "anti-avoidance" legislation restricting these kinds of practices is being introduced in April.


Edited by Eric Mc on Tuesday 9th January 14:25

trooperiziz

Original Poster:

9,456 posts

253 months

Tuesday 9th January 2007
quotequote all
Plotloss said:
Rough calculation

Take your hourly, double it, add three zeros

So £50 per hour on a 40 hour week roughly equates to £100K

Then work out tax as per normal salary.

If your contract is IR35 friendly the tax will be significantly less overall though.


Cheers Plotloss

So working on this formula and assuming worst case that I will be taxed as a normal employee, it seems that it would be worth doing monetary wise even with my added travel costs.

I suppose the difficult choice is whether to go with an umbrella company as the least hassle option, or setup my own limited and get my own accountant. A LOT more hassle but it should get me a few more pennies out of the pot. How many pennies is the question though...


SS HSV

9,642 posts

259 months

Tuesday 9th January 2007
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
Even the umbrella company route can throw up wildly differing scenarios.

It depends on whether the umbrella company operates in a consrervative fashion and applies straight PAYE and National Insurance to your earnings. In those circumstances, your take home pay will be very similar to what it would be if you were a "normal" employee.

If the umbrella company is more "adventurous", it may treat the contractor as a shareholder and pay on the basis of salary and/or dividends. This will generally result in a better take home pay situation.
However, this whole area is being put under the microscope by HM Revenue and Customs and new "anti-avoidance" legislation restricting these kinds of practices is being introduced in April.


Edited by Eric Mc on Tuesday 9th January 14:25


Good description. I used to use Gabem Managment. They were very helpful, good communicators and saved me a whole heap of tax.

The only reason I have now left them is that my business is expanding at an alarming rate, and other than day to day expenses, there is no way of factoring in for allowances for company vehicles.

Have a look it might be for you (till they close the loophole) www.gabem.com/

225

1,331 posts

227 months

Tuesday 9th January 2007
quotequote all
Dont forget as a contractor you really are working out salary on roughly 44 weeks, what with sickness, holidays, bank holidays etc.
Setting up your own company is easy and the biggest hassle is setting up the company account I found. An accountant can do it all for you for about £100 and set up a token monthly wage of say £500 and then you take the rest as dividends and only pay 20% corporation tax.

trooperiziz

Original Poster:

9,456 posts

253 months

Tuesday 9th January 2007
quotequote all
SS HSV said:
Eric Mc said:
Even the umbrella company route can throw up wildly differing scenarios.

It depends on whether the umbrella company operates in a consrervative fashion and applies straight PAYE and National Insurance to your earnings. In those circumstances, your take home pay will be very similar to what it would be if you were a "normal" employee.

If the umbrella company is more "adventurous", it may treat the contractor as a shareholder and pay on the basis of salary and/or dividends. This will generally result in a better take home pay situation.
However, this whole area is being put under the microscope by HM Revenue and Customs and new "anti-avoidance" legislation restricting these kinds of practices is being introduced in April.


Edited by Eric Mc on Tuesday 9th January 14:25


Good description. I used to use Gabem Managment. They were very helpful, good communicators and saved me a whole heap of tax.

The only reason I have now left them is that my business is expanding at an alarming rate, and other than day to day expenses, there is no way of factoring in for allowances for company vehicles.

Have a look it might be for you (till they close the loophole) www.gabem.com/


This seems to be along the more "adventurous" lines of umbrella company. I don't really want to have the possibility of a tax bill at an unforseen time, so I think I'd prefer to got with a more conservative umbrella company. Certainly until I decide contracting is for me.


trooperiziz

Original Poster:

9,456 posts

253 months

Tuesday 9th January 2007
quotequote all
225 said:
Dont forget as a contractor you really are working out salary on roughly 44 weeks, what with sickness, holidays, bank holidays etc.
Setting up your own company is easy and the biggest hassle is setting up the company account I found. An accountant can do it all for you for about £100 and set up a token monthly wage of say £500 and then you take the rest as dividends and only pay 20% corporation tax.


But woudln't that screw me on IR35 if I only work for one company over the next year?

Eric Mc

122,110 posts

266 months

Wednesday 10th January 2007
quotequote all
It could - although the terms of the contract and the manner in which you deal with the people you work for is just as important than how long you work for them.

chucklebutty

319 posts

244 months

Wednesday 10th January 2007
quotequote all
I used Prosperity4 for a year and using your £350/day figure I think 4.4k p.m. take home and the pension contribution are easily acheivable. Maybe more TBH.

It depends how much you 'expense' though them - you can claim all sorts of stuff back.

trooperiziz

Original Poster:

9,456 posts

253 months

Wednesday 10th January 2007
quotequote all
chucklebutty said:
I used Prosperity4 for a year


Any thoughts? Good, bad, indifferent...

munky

5,328 posts

249 months

Wednesday 10th January 2007
quotequote all
take home is on average 79% for me, but that's before the tax on divs over the 37k (or whatever it is) threshold but after NI, fees, corporation tax, liability insurance, expenses etc.

si 330

1,299 posts

210 months

Wednesday 10th January 2007
quotequote all
I’m the process of making the change to freelance and have had a couple of illustrations from different umbrella companies. Filetravel were indicating 83% as I have not worked through them I can’t comment if they are good or poor. Brooksons are indicating 81% from there illustration.

UpTheIron

3,999 posts

269 months

Wednesday 10th January 2007
quotequote all
si 330 said:
I’m the process of making the change to freelance and have had a couple of illustrations from different umbrella companies. Filetravel were indicating 83% as I have not worked through them I can’t comment if they are good or poor. Brooksons are indicating 81% from there illustration.
i) are those figures specific to your circumstance and ii) just how shady are some of their practices?

To get to that level of net income they must be using a lot of expense "allowances"...something that personally I would rather avoid unless I have a receipt to back up the claim!

munky

5,328 posts

249 months

Wednesday 10th January 2007
quotequote all
well corporation tax is 19% (IIRC?) so anything over 81% seems impossible, and then there's employer's NI, employee NI, liability insurance and fees to the umbrella co. to pay. Unless you have *lots* of expenses to offset. Be wary of wild claims, and then bear in mind you will have to pay 32.5% tax on the dividends over a certain amount in the self assessment

UpTheIron

3,999 posts

269 months

Wednesday 10th January 2007
quotequote all
A bit harsh maybe, but I wouldn't touch an organisation that charges "10% charge on gross VAT savings" made by signing up to the flat rate scheme. What is their justification for that then?!!

Eric Mc

122,110 posts

266 months

Wednesday 10th January 2007
quotequote all
Time is running out for umbrella companies who make use of exotic practices. The legislation is being tightened up from April 2007.

My expectation is that it will not be allowed to make "contractors" nominal shareholders in these umbrella companies thereby blocking entirely any possibility of being paid by means of dividends.

Expense claims will be limited to only the types of expense claims that would be payable to normal employees.


Edited by Eric Mc on Wednesday 10th January 17:08