What 512GB SSD

Author
Discussion

BigJonMcQuimm

Original Poster:

975 posts

212 months

Friday 25th July 2014
quotequote all
Hi

I need to speed up the wife's 2009/10 unibody Macbook Pro.

I have maxed out the RAM, and am now looking for a SSD.

Any recommendations? I was looking at the Samsung 840 - but really do not know which drive would be the best.

Many thanks

Randomthoughts

917 posts

133 months

Friday 25th July 2014
quotequote all
Toshiba HG5/HG6 are solid drives.

nyt

1,807 posts

150 months

Friday 25th July 2014
quotequote all
I've been looking for similar.
Samsung have a good reputation, along with Intel.
The speed differential between them seems too small to be noticeable.

As prices have fallen, I'm tempted by a 1TB:

http://www.amazon.co.uk/Samsung-2-5-inch-Basic-Sol...


The only thing holding me back is news that there may be an imminent and significant speed-up in SSDs which probably won't be back-ported.

http://www.extremetech.com/computing/183162-new-me...

paranoid airbag

2,679 posts

159 months

Friday 25th July 2014
quotequote all
Out of interest, anyone know why this (admittedly "only" 480GB):

http://www.amazon.co.uk/Crucial-CT480M500SSD1-2-5-...

seems significantly cheaper than similarly sized SSDs?

nyt

1,807 posts

150 months

Friday 25th July 2014
quotequote all
paranoid airbag said:
Out of interest, anyone know why this (admittedly "only" 480GB):

http://www.amazon.co.uk/Crucial-CT480M500SSD1-2-5-...

seems significantly cheaper than similarly sized SSDs?
I think that it's a superseded drive - still perfectly good and reliable, just not the latest and greatest

Randomthoughts

917 posts

133 months

Friday 25th July 2014
quotequote all
As above, M500 has been replaced by the M550. M500s are still very good, very quick drives; just not as quick as their replacement.

Esseesse

8,969 posts

208 months

Friday 25th July 2014
quotequote all
I have a 2009 17" MBP with a 512GB Samsung 840 Pro. Can't comment on any others, but had it for about a year with no problems at all.

Jaldi

1,195 posts

235 months

Friday 25th July 2014
quotequote all
paranoid airbag said:
Out of interest, anyone know why this (admittedly "only" 480GB):

http://www.amazon.co.uk/Crucial-CT480M500SSD1-2-5-...

seems significantly cheaper than similarly sized SSDs?
Blimey, I paid around £250 for my one! That was Dec 2013 though.
Can't fault it so far.

nyt

1,807 posts

150 months

Tuesday 29th July 2014
quotequote all

Du1point8

21,607 posts

192 months

Tuesday 29th July 2014
quotequote all
use camelcamelcamel to keep track of them

http://uk.camelcamelcamel.com/Crucial-CT512M550SSD...

Foliage

3,861 posts

122 months

Tuesday 29th July 2014
quotequote all
Have a look on tomshardware and see which one reviews the best and fits your needs the best.

lestag

4,614 posts

276 months

Tuesday 29th July 2014
quotequote all

gaz1234

5,233 posts

219 months

Tuesday 29th July 2014
quotequote all
i assume raiding ssd is fine?

Vaud

50,471 posts

155 months

Tuesday 29th July 2014
quotequote all
gaz1234 said:
i assume raiding ssd is fine?
Yes.
http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/ssd-raid-bench...

cornet

1,469 posts

158 months

Tuesday 29th July 2014
quotequote all
There have been plenty of threads on this.

My view is always this:

  • Pretty much any SSD will be orders of magnitude faster than a regular hard disc.
  • Ignore the speed specifications - you are highly unlikely to notice any real world difference for normal laptop/desktop use.
  • The only consumer drive to have power loss protection is the crucial M5XX range.
For a laptop the latter isn't actually as important as for a desktop since most laptops will power down gracefully when the battery gets very low. However I see no reason to risk it.

TL;DR : Get the Crucial M500 or M550


Esseesse

8,969 posts

208 months

Tuesday 29th July 2014
quotequote all
cornet said:
There have been plenty of threads on this.

My view is always this:

  • Pretty much any SSD will be orders of magnitude faster than a regular hard disc.
  • Ignore the speed specifications - you are highly unlikely to notice any real world difference for normal laptop/desktop use.
  • The only consumer drive to have power loss protection is the crucial M5XX range.
For a laptop the latter isn't actually as important as for a desktop since most laptops will power down gracefully when the battery gets very low. However I see no reason to risk it.

TL;DR : Get the Crucial M500 or M550
Well a 2009 MBP is Sata 2 anyway IIRC.

mmm-five

11,239 posts

284 months

Tuesday 29th July 2014
quotequote all
Crucial MX100 - almost the same performance of the M550 at the M500 (which it replaces) price point (i.e. £150 for the 512gb).

Riff Raff

5,118 posts

195 months

Tuesday 29th July 2014
quotequote all
mmm-five said:
Crucial MX100 - almost the same performance of the M550 at the M500 (which it replaces) price point (i.e. £150 for the 512gb).
I've just put one of these in my MacBook. The installation kit - a bit of wire to connect the SSD to a USB port made the job of cloning the SSD to the old hard drive a doddle. The only hard thing about the installation was trying to work out if I needed the drive spacer or not whistle

Vaud

50,471 posts

155 months

Tuesday 29th July 2014
quotequote all
Riff Raff said:
I've just put one of these in my MacBook. The installation kit - a bit of wire to connect the SSD to a USB port made the job of cloning the SSD to the old hard drive a doddle. The only hard thing about the installation was trying to work out if I needed the drive spacer or not whistle
And? Did you?

Riff Raff

5,118 posts

195 months

Tuesday 29th July 2014
quotequote all
Vaud said:
And? Did you?
After trying with and without, I left it out. The SSD is a shade thinner than the old hard disk, but the SSD plus the spacer would have been too thick by a couple of mils.