DB11 - WITH LESS DISGUISE

DB11 - WITH LESS DISGUISE

Author
Discussion

Jon39

Original Poster:

12,826 posts

143 months

Monday 18th January 2016
quotequote all









SELON

1,172 posts

129 months

Monday 18th January 2016
quotequote all
Looks a bit like a stretched DB10. The front lights seem very similar looking at the outlines through the camouflage.
Looks pretty chunky. More practical in the rear???? Wonder if it's a CF body?


kensilver

312 posts

119 months

Monday 18th January 2016
quotequote all
They haven't departed too far from the recognisable design features, that's encouraging - but will probably still annoy the general public who keep saying that Aston haven't changed their look for over a decade.

For me the grill defines the brand and I'm keen to see how it looks. Seems to have the same type of slats as earlier models.

old phart

404 posts

110 months

Tuesday 19th January 2016
quotequote all
Still wondering what the intake by the rear window might be for? Or is the vinyl just catching air?

ds2000

2,689 posts

192 months

Wednesday 27th January 2016
quotequote all
I've just seen this


IanV12VR

2,749 posts

155 months

Wednesday 27th January 2016
quotequote all
That roof design looks very similar to the DBX

cayman-black

12,644 posts

216 months

Wednesday 27th January 2016
quotequote all
Another beautiful Aston, these are going to do well .

woodsypedia

870 posts

153 months

Wednesday 27th January 2016
quotequote all
That looks pornographic. I love the rear end. Shame about the twin turbo wink

Vee12V

1,333 posts

160 months

Wednesday 27th January 2016
quotequote all
Pretty sure that's the final design. Very fussy though.

George29

14,707 posts

164 months

Wednesday 27th January 2016
quotequote all
ds2000 said:
I've just seen this

I'm intrigued to see the finished design close up. The way the roof blends into the rest of the car looks a bit odd, doesn't look very smooth/flowing lines like I'd have expected, but it might be the angle of the pic.

hornbaek

3,675 posts

235 months

Wednesday 27th January 2016
quotequote all
Hmmm - it doesn't blow me over (as the DB9 did first time i saw it in 2004).

montecristo

1,043 posts

177 months

Wednesday 27th January 2016
quotequote all
It doesn't make me want to swap up. Looks a bit Chrysler Crossfireish from that angle.

DB9VolanteDriver

2,612 posts

176 months

Wednesday 27th January 2016
quotequote all
I hope the limited view of the side vent doesn't show that the bonnet will be a clamshell like on the F-Type. I just hate the horizontal cut line in the wing that results. That's one of the nice features of the current AM line up; minimal cut lines at the front, especially the headlight and the nosecone (there isn't one).

FrankieBee

757 posts

122 months

Wednesday 27th January 2016
quotequote all
Very difficult to tell what it's really like from just one grainy picture!

I'll reserve judgement and share my views after I've seen it in the flesh at Gaydon on the 19th February.


Edited by FrankieBee on Wednesday 27th January 17:23

Gettoff

1,434 posts

207 months

Wednesday 27th January 2016
quotequote all
FrankieBee said:
Very difficult to tell what it's really like from just one grainy picture!
Agree with this, will need to reserve judgement until seen in the flesh to get a better sense of lines and proportion. First impressions are a bit underwhelming though.

IanV12VR

2,749 posts

155 months

Wednesday 27th January 2016
quotequote all
DB9VolanteDriver said:
I hope the limited view of the side vent doesn't show that the bonnet will be a clamshell like on the F-Type. I just hate the horizontal cut line in the wing that results. That's one of the nice features of the current AM line up; minimal cut lines at the front, especially the headlight and the nosecone (there isn't one).
I think i heard somewhere that the bonnet will be a clamshell. Cant remember where though!

Jon39

Original Poster:

12,826 posts

143 months

Wednesday 27th January 2016
quotequote all

This registration mark is at present shown to be on a black car, September 2015, 5935cc.

Are we therefore looking at another computer picture?


SteveMor

94 posts

139 months

Wednesday 27th January 2016
quotequote all
I reckon it's a photoshop, does not look guite right to me particularly around the front wheel arch. If it's real, it does look a bit fussy to me, I prefer simple elegant lines, but of course need to see it in the flesh.

SteveMor

94 posts

139 months

Wednesday 27th January 2016
quotequote all
I reckon it's a photoshop, does not look guite right to me particularly around the front wheel arch. If it's real, it does look a bit fussy to me, I prefer simple elegant lines, but of course need to see it in the flesh.

skeena river rover

57 posts

101 months

Thursday 28th January 2016
quotequote all
Here is a picture of the front. I am not a fan of the head light. To sharp/ Japanese