Forum spam

Author
Discussion

Pigeon

Original Poster:

18,535 posts

247 months

Sunday 9th December 2007
quotequote all
No, not on here, but we all hate them, wherever they are...

Seeing a lot in the last couple of weeks, leaving links to virtual servers on 208.116.31.140.

Nmap says:


nmap -A -P0 208.116.31.140

Starting Nmap 4.11 ( http://www.insecure.org/nmap/ ) at 2007-12-09 20:21 GMT
Warning: Giving up on port early because retransmission cap hit.
RTTVAR has grown to over 2.3 seconds, decreasing to 2.0
RTTVAR has grown to over 2.3 seconds, decreasing to 2.0
RTTVAR has grown to over 2.3 seconds, decreasing to 2.0
RTTVAR has grown to over 2.3 seconds, decreasing to 2.0
RTTVAR has grown to over 2.3 seconds, decreasing to 2.0
RTTVAR has grown to over 2.3 seconds, decreasing to 2.0
Interesting ports on 208.116.31.140:
Not shown: 1604 closed ports, 71 filtered ports
PORT STATE SERVICE VERSION
80/tcp open http Apache httpd 1.3.33 ((Win32) PHP/4.4.4)
139/tcp open netbios-ssn
1025/tcp open msrpc Microsoft Windows RPC
3389/tcp open microsoft-rdp Microsoft Terminal Service
8443/tcp open ssl/http Microsoft IIS webserver 6.0
No exact OS matches for host (If you know what OS is running on it, see http://www.insecure.org/cgi-bin/nmap-submit.cgi).
TCP/IP fingerprint:
SInfo(V=4.11%P=i686-pc-linux-gnu%D=12/9%Tm=475C545B%O=80%C=1)
TSeq(Class=TR%IPID=I%TS=0)


There's a Plesk login on 8443.

JamieBeeston

9,294 posts

266 months

Sunday 9th December 2007
quotequote all
smile technically by port scanning them you're breaking the law smile

Spam happens, just ban the IP, report it to the abuse@ dept and move on.

J

Pigeon

Original Poster:

18,535 posts

247 months

Sunday 9th December 2007
quotequote all
Difficult to ban spambots by IP though...

Think I'm better off trying to persuade Those With The Power to implement a CAPTCHA in the registration, and in the meantime, moaning on here is cathartic smile

JamieBeeston

9,294 posts

266 months

Sunday 9th December 2007
quotequote all
Pigeon said:
Difficult to ban spambots by IP though...

Think I'm better off trying to persuade Those With The Power to implement a CAPTCHA in the registration, and in the meantime, moaning on here is cathartic smile
wink CAPTCHA is certainly worth implementing (although make sure the implementation in itself is secure, simply bolting it on will only result in smarter spambots getting through!)

smile

TheLearner

6,962 posts

236 months

Monday 10th December 2007
quotequote all
China, Russia and AOL. Nothing good ever comes from those places and they can die.
Speaking in terms of IP blocks.

CAPTCHA will stop most of the dense ones getting in, however there are bots out there which defeat it either automatically or with human assistence; you've also got spyware which throws up images to get the woman to undress... guess where it gets those from?

Another good one to add along side it is a little radio button with "Are you Human?" seems to help and for those running common forum software.... only idiots of the first order run it in the default location (i.e. phpbb/) with the default theme (i.e. subsilver or hand modified subsilver) as that gives the bots a nice big bullseye to home in on via google.

CommanderJameson

22,096 posts

227 months

Monday 10th December 2007
quotequote all
JamieBeeston said:
smile technically by port scanning them you're breaking the law
Are you? What law?

>>>curious<<<

TheLearner

6,962 posts

236 months

Monday 10th December 2007
quotequote all
CommanderJameson said:
JamieBeeston said:
smile technically by port scanning them you're breaking the law
Are you? What law?

>>>curious<<<
Computer Misuse I'd wager.

JamieBeeston

9,294 posts

266 months

Monday 10th December 2007
quotequote all
TheLearner said:
CommanderJameson said:
JamieBeeston said:
smile technically by port scanning them you're breaking the law
Are you? What law?

>>>curious<<<
Computer Misuse I'd wager.
aye, CMA...

smile

Pigeon

Original Poster:

18,535 posts

247 months

Tuesday 11th December 2007
quotequote all
TheLearner said:
China, Russia and AOL. Nothing good ever comes from those places and they can die.
Speaking in terms of IP blocks.
Yeah smile In this case the spam is promoting German websites hosted on a server in the US. What IP ranges the spam itself is coming from, is another matter of course.
TheLearner said:
CAPTCHA will stop most of the dense ones getting in, however there are bots out there which defeat it either automatically or with human assistence; you've also got spyware which throws up images to get the woman to undress... guess where it gets those from?
Of course if you introduce human assistance there's not a lot you can do to stop it apart from wholesale blocking of large IP ranges. But I'd reckon that CAPTCHA is the biggest single improvement that one can make.

Current situation is that the forum receives about 50 new registrations per week of which recently about 20 are spam, and most of these promote the same site; it looks to me like a new bot has gone active.